2010issue C0970
Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
A liquidity filter and open interest analysis rank futures by how easy they are to enter and exit. Survivors are then compared on equal-dollar contract count and effective percent margin.
- A liquidity filter keeps only futures whose activity, cost, and size profile make an order realistically executable.
- Open interest analysis uses outstanding contracts as a scale factor so markets with more unclosed positions rank as easier to enter and exit.
- Relative contract liquidity multiplies equal-dollar contract count, total open interest, and a volume factor; markets at the top are the easiest to buy and sell.
- Liquidity and equal-dollar figures are proportional and only informative when one futures contract is compared with others in the same column.
A filter before the book
A liquidity filter is a pre-trade screen that keeps only futures whose activity, cost, and size profile make an order realistically executable. Markets that fail that test never reach the later comparison.
Open interest analysis uses outstanding contracts as a scale factor so markets with more unclosed positions rank as easier to enter and exit.
How relative contract liquidity is built
A futures liquidity ranking can be built by multiplying contract point value, the largest price move observed over three years, open interest, and a volume adjustment that is usually between 1 and 4.
Relative contract liquidity is the equal-dollar contract count times total open interest times a volume factor. It is a cross-market score from those three inputs, and higher scores mark easier two-way trading.
The volume factor
The volume factor is a multiplier that lifts or floors the liquidity score when traded volume sits far from a 5000-contract reference level.
That volume factor is the greater of 1 and the exponential of the natural log of volume divided by the natural log of 5000, minus 2.
Equal-dollar contract count
The equal-dollar contract count is how many contracts of one future match another future's three-year dollar range, so opportunity is compared on the same money base.
The number of contracts needed for equal dollar profit equals tick dollar value times the three-year maximum price excursion, so every entry in that comparison shares the same dollar scale.
Effective percent margin
Effective percent margin equals margin dollars divided by the contract's three-year dollar price range, then multiplied by 100. It is initial margin expressed as a share of that range, used to compare capital intensity across markets.
Posted versus effective percent margin by futures contract

Effective percent margin is the dollar margin divided by the three-year range of contract dollar value, times 100. Rows printed as 0.0% posted margin are as published, not missing values.
How to read the ranking
Markets at the top of a relative-liquidity ranking are the easiest to buy and sell. Markets at the bottom are the hardest, and a single activity mark or none signals thin trading.
Liquidity and equal-dollar columns are proportional measures and are informative only when one futures contract is compared with others in the same column.
Selecting among the survivors
Futures contract selection is choosing among listed futures after liquidity and dollar size have been normalized, so one market can sit in a comparable book with others.
A share-turnover analogue
In listed shares, period volume as a percentage of shares outstanding can serve as a turnover-based proxy for trading liquidity. Share turnover is the equity-market analogue of futures activity: period volume as a fraction of shares outstanding.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
- 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
- 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
- 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
- 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
- 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
- 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
- 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
- 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
- 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
- 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
- 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
- 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
- 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
- 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
- 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
- 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
- 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
- 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
- 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
- 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
- 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
- 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
- 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
- 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
- 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
- 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
- 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
- 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
- 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
- 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
- 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
- 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
- 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
- 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
- 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
- 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
- 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
- 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
- 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
- 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
- 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
- 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest