Skip to main content
Track Futures contract selection
18 / 51
Library

2013issue C0664

Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection

Relative contract liquidity ranks listed futures from contract size, a three-year price excursion, open interest, and a volume factor. Equal-dollar-profit counts and effective percent margin then place those markets on a common exposure and capital-lock-up scale.

  • A liquidity filter keeps only contracts with enough activity, book depth, and volume to be treated as executable, and sets thin books aside.
  • Relative contract liquidity multiplies contract point value by a three-year maximum price move, then by open interest, then by a volume factor, and each column is read against other contracts in the same ranking.
  • Open interest raises a contract's rank after size and volume are applied, while markets with one activity unit or none are treated as low-activity and less suitable for speculative execution.
  • An equal-dollar-profit count scales each listed market to the same dollar opportunity, and effective percent margin compares capital lock-up across those markets.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A pre-trade liquidity filter

A liquidity filter is a pre-trade screen that keeps only contracts with enough activity, book depth, and volume to be treated as executable, and sets thin books aside. Markets marked with one activity unit or none are treated as low-activity and therefore less suitable for speculative execution.

Futures contract selection, as defined here, means choosing among listed futures by comparing liquidity rank, equal-dollar contract counts, and margin efficiency rather than by directional thesis alone. Relative contract liquidity is a comparative measure only: each column is meaningful when read against other contracts in the same ranking.

How the liquidity rank is formed

A futures liquidity rank can be formed by multiplying contract point value by a three-year maximum price move, then by open interest, then by a volume factor. Relative contract liquidity is that cross-market ranking of how easily a futures book can be traded, combining contract size, a multi-year price excursion, open interest, and a volume adjustment.

Open-interest analysis uses outstanding contract count as a multiplicative input so a large open book raises a market's rank after size and volume are accounted for. Open interest enters the relative-liquidity score as a multiplicative term, so a larger outstanding book raises a contract's rank after size and volume are applied.

The volume factor

The volume factor is a low-activity adjustment applied to the liquidity rank. The volume factor in that rank is the greater of 1 and an exponential of the natural log of volume over the natural log of 5000, minus 2.

Equal-dollar counts and margin lock-up

An equal-dollar-profit count is defined as tick dollar value times the three-year maximum price excursion, so each listed market is scaled to the same dollar opportunity. It is how many contracts of one market must be traded to match another market's three-year dollar price excursion.

Effective percent margin is posted margin divided by the three-year range of contract dollar value, then multiplied by one hundred. Posted margin is expressed as a share of the three-year dollar range of the contract and is used to compare capital lock-up across markets.

A share-market analogue

For listed shares, a turnover-style liquidity proxy is period volume divided by shares outstanding. That equity-turnover-proxy is a stock-market analogue for trading liquidity.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
18 of 51 in the Futures contract selection track
201364-64 pp.Next on Futures contract selectionFilter listed futures by liquidity and open interest firstA liquidity-filter ranks listed futures by how readily size can be executed, using range, activity, and cost inputs rather than a price forecast.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
  1. 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
  2. 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
  3. 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
  4. 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
  5. 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  6. 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  7. 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
  8. 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
  9. 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  10. 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
  11. 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
  12. 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
  13. 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
  14. 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
  15. 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
  16. 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
  17. 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
  18. 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
  19. 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
  20. 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
  21. 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  22. 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
  23. 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
  24. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
  25. 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  26. 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  27. 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  28. 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
  29. 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  30. 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
  31. 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
  32. 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
  33. 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
  34. 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
  35. 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  36. 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
  37. 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
  38. 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  39. 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
  40. 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
  41. 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  42. 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  43. 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
  44. 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
  45. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
  46. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
  47. 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
  48. 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
  49. 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
  50. 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
  51. 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest
All 51 readings tagged Futures contract selection
Also on Futures contract selection5 readings