2016issue C0355
Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
Futures contract selection can treat trading liquidity as a first-pass filter so thinly traded listings are set aside before a speculative order is sized. Relative contract liquidity ranks markets by combining equal-dollar contract counts with open interest and a volume factor.
- Trading liquidity can be a first-pass filter that sets thinly traded listings aside before a speculative order is sized.
- Relative contract liquidity ranks markets from easiest to hardest to trade by combining the contracts needed for an equal-dollar outcome with open interest and a volume factor.
- Percent margin and effective percent margin compare posted capital, but each table column is meaningful only against other rows in the same column.
- A volume factor marks down listings that lack sufficient turnover, so thin activity is not treated as equally tradable.
Liquidity as a first-pass filter
Futures contract selection can treat trading liquidity as a first-pass filter so thinly traded listings are set aside before a speculative order is sized.
Relative contract liquidity is a comparative ranking of listed futures. It combines how many contracts are needed for a similar dollar outcome with open interest and a volume adjustment, so markets can be ordered from easiest to hardest to trade.
That ranking can be read in descending order. More marks on the right-hand scale indicate easier two-way activity, while one mark or none flags limited activity.
How the liquidity score is built
A workable liquidity score multiplies the contracts needed for an equal-dollar outcome by total open interest and then by a volume factor, so both outstanding positions and recent activity enter the ranking.
The contracts to trade for equal dollar profit is a scaling count that asks how many contracts of one futures market are needed to match another market's potential dollar outcome. The count is built from tick dollar value times a three-year maximum price excursion so markets with different point values can be compared on a common dollar scale.
Open interest is the outstanding stock of open futures positions. Together with volume, it is used to judge whether a contract can absorb speculative orders.
The volume factor is applied when volume is thin, so low-activity contracts are marked down in the liquidity ranking rather than treated as equally tradable. It is the greater of 1 or a function of logged volume versus a 5,000-contract reference, which down-weights listings that lack sufficient turnover.
Contracts needed for equal dollar profit

All listings are scaled to the same dollar profit potential using the past three years of price range. Relative liquidity (the original dot column) is a separate ranking and is not plotted here. Listings with a blank contracts cell are omitted.
How margin columns should be read
Percent margin is the posted margin expressed as a percentage of contract value. It is useful for comparing capital commitment across markets, but it is not a substitute for liquidity.
Effective percent margin is a companion column. It divides margin dollars by the three-year dollar range of the contract so posted capital can be compared with historical range rather than with notional value alone, then scales the result so traders can see how much capital is tied up relative to that range.
Each column in such a table is a proportional comparison that is meaningful only against other rows in the same column, not as a standalone absolute score.
A related cash-equity framing
In a related cash-equity framing, trading activity can be treated as a liquidity proxy by expressing period volume as a share of shares outstanding, that is, as a turnover rate.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
- 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
- 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
- 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
- 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
- 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
- 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
- 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
- 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
- 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
- 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
- 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
- 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
- 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
- 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
- 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
- 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
- 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
- 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
- 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
- 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
- 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
- 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
- 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
- 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
- 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
- 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
- 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
- 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
- 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
- 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
- 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
- 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
- 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
- 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
- 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
- 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
- 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
- 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
- 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
- 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
- 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
- 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
- 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest