Skip to main content
Track Futures contract selection
33 / 51
Library

2017issue C0558

A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract

The historical workflow scales each futures listing to the same dollar exposure, then ranks relative contract liquidity from open interest and a volume factor so markets that cannot absorb a chosen size can be set aside.

  • Scale every futures listing to a shared dollar exposure with an equal-dollar contract count from tick value and a three-year maximum price move.
  • Relative contract liquidity multiplies that count by total open interest and a volume factor, usually from 1 to 4.
  • Each column is a proportional measure and is meaningful only next to other contracts in the same column.
  • The top of the relative-liquidity ranking is presented as easiest to buy and sell; the bottom as the most difficult.
Entries in this reading3 entries

From listed futures to an executable contract

Futures contract selection is the act of choosing among listed futures by comparing how much dollar risk each contract represents and how readily that risk can be put on or taken off.

The archive workflow then applies a liquidity filter. That screen uses volume, open interest, margin, and related trading-cost inputs over the life of an order to decide whether a futures contract is executable.

Same dollar risk first

Before markets are ranked, each listing is placed on the same dollar-risk footing. The equal-dollar contract count is the number of contracts of one market needed to match another market's dollar exposure after scaling by tick value and a three-year maximum price move.

In the archive construction, an equal-dollar-profit contract count equals tick dollar value times the three-year maximum price excursion, so every listed count shares the same dollar value.

Contracts required for equal dollar profit

A one-lot in WTI, RBOB, ULSD or Brent already matches the three-year dollar move that takes 28 eurodollar contracts or 21 fed-funds contracts. The bars are the May 2017 Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities column that multiplies tick-dollar value by the three-year maximum price excursion so every listing is on the same dollar-risk footing. Names stay in the published relative-liquidity order, from S&P 500 E-Mini down to palladium.
A one-lot in WTI, RBOB, ULSD or Brent already matches the three-year dollar move that takes 28 eurodollar contracts or 21 fed-funds contracts. The bars are the May 2017 Technical Analysis of Stocks & Commodities column that multiplies tick-dollar value by the three-year maximum price excursion so every listing is on the same dollar-risk footing. Names stay in the published relative-liquidity order, from S&P 500 E-Mini down to palladium.Listed U.S. futures, front-month contracts in the May 2017 table · May 2017 listing; three-year price-range window

The source fixed the lookback at three years so every figure in this column has equal dollar value. Relative-liquidity dots on the original sheet are not numeric and the top rows overflow, so they are not plotted.

Open interest and the volume factor

Open interest analysis uses the stock of outstanding contracts, together with volume, as a capacity check on whether a chosen size can be absorbed.

Relative contract liquidity equals the equal-dollar contracts-to-trade count times total open interest times a volume factor. The futures liquidity rank is produced by multiplying contract point value by a three-year maximum price move, by open interest, and by a volume factor usually from 1 to 4.

The volume factor is an adjustment, typically from 1 to 4, that raises or lowers the liquidity rank for unusually low or high volume. It is the greater of 1 and the exponential of the natural log of volume divided by the natural log of 5000, minus 2.

How to read the rank

Each column is a proportional measure and is meaningful only when compared with other contracts in the same column.

Contracts at the top of the relative-liquidity ranking are presented as easiest to buy and sell. Contracts at the bottom are presented as the most difficult.

Activity markers on the rank identify the most actively traded contracts with the largest cluster of markers. Little activity is identified with one marker or none.

Margin use and share turnover

Effective percent margin equals dollar margin divided by the three-year dollar range of the contract, then multiplied by 100, so margin use can be compared across markets.

For listed shares, trading activity is treated as a liquidity proxy equal to period volume as a percentage of shares outstanding.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
33 of 51 in the Futures contract selection track
201758-58 pp.Next on Futures contract selectionConstructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selectionA futures liquidity rank is assembled by multiplying contract point value, a three-year maximum price move, open interest, and a volume adjustment usually set between 1 and 4.
All readings on this track · 51 readings
  1. 2002Single-stock futures and the sleeve that belongs on the ticket
  2. 2007Ethanol futures liquidity lagged the policy boom
  3. 2010Relative liquidity ranking for futures contract selection
  4. 2010A liquidity filter for executable futures contract selection
  5. 2010Screening futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  6. 2010Ranking futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  7. 2010Liquidity and open interest screens for futures selection
  8. 2010Ranking futures by open interest and equal-dollar liquidity
  9. 2011Liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  10. 2011Futures liquidity rank as an execution filter
  11. 2011Silver contract-selection by size, hours, and carry
  12. 2011Filtering futures by liquidity, open interest and equal-dollar size
  13. 2011Liquidity and open interest as a screen for futures selection
  14. 2011A futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar execution
  15. 2012Ranking futures liquidity before choosing a contract
  16. 2013Liquidity-first futures contract selection
  17. 2013Equal-dollar liquidity filter for futures contract choice
  18. 2013Futures liquidity filters for executable contract selection
  19. 2013Filter listed futures by liquidity and open interest first
  20. 2013Ranking listed futures by liquidity and equal-dollar size
  21. 2013A pre-trade liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  22. 2014Why commodity futures are trades, not long-horizon holdings
  23. 2014Rank futures liquidity before selecting the contract
  24. 2014Filter futures by equal-dollar liquidity and open interest
  25. 2015Filter futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  26. 2015A two-stage liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  27. 2015Screen futures contracts by liquidity and open interest
  28. 2015Equal-dollar futures choice as a liquidity filter
  29. 2016Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  30. 2016Ranking futures liquidity before you pick the contract
  31. 2016Filter listed futures by relative liquidity and open interest
  32. 2017Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract selection
  33. 2017A relative liquidity rank for choosing an executable futures contract
  34. 2017Constructing a futures liquidity filter for contract selection
  35. 2017Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar size
  36. 2017Rank futures liquidity before contract selection
  37. 2017Build a futures liquidity filter from open interest
  38. 2018Evaluating futures liquidity for executable contract choice
  39. 2018Volume-confirmed pivots versus unregulated spot exposure
  40. 2018Executable futures selection from a 2018 liquidity board
  41. 2018Evaluate futures liquidity before contract selection
  42. 2018Open-interest liquidity filter for futures contract selection
  43. 2018Construct a futures liquidity filter from open interest and range
  44. 2018Ranking futures by liquidity, open interest, and equal-dollar cost
  45. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before contract selection
  46. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you pick a contract
  47. 2019Screening futures by equal-dollar liquidity
  48. 2020Building an equal-dollar futures liquidity screen
  49. 2020Use liquidity and open interest as a futures execution screen
  50. 2020Compact index futures as diversified contract selection
  51. 2020Filter futures by range-scaled liquidity and open interest
All 51 readings tagged Futures contract selection
Also on Futures contract selection5 readings