Skip to main content
Track Historical volatility analysis
17 / 31
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

2006issue C071-7

Implied volatility doubling as a commodity regime signal

Archive notes on soybeans show implied volatility rising from 25% in May 2005 to 50% in July 2005, after which the prior futures advance reversed. TradersWeek editorial: treat that 100% increase as a market-regime checkpoint that starts by comparing option premium with historical volatility.

  • Implied volatility is treated here as a chart-readable supply-and-demand measure of option premium and as a market-regime gauge, not as a pricing formula.
  • In the soybean case, implied volatility rose from 25% in May 2005 to 50% in July 2005, after which the February-to-July futures advance reversed and the September 2005 $8 out-of-the-money call expired worthless.
  • Backtests across several commodities associated a 100% implied-volatility increase with a pause or reversal of the prevailing futures trend, except when war or severe weather intervened.
  • TradersWeek editorial: use that doubling as a checkpoint that starts by comparing option premium with historical volatility before judging whether a commodity trend is exhausted.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Current trackHistorical volatility analysis47 readingsOption premium analysis47 readingsImplied volatility analysis70 readings

Implied volatility as a regime gauge

In the archive notes, implied volatility is framed as a supply-and-demand measure of option premium that can be read from charts without solving the pricing mathematics. The working definition here is the option-implied estimate of expected movement, used as a market-regime gauge rather than a pricing formula.

The soybean doubling in 2005

In the soybean case, implied volatility rose from 25% in May 2005 to 50% in July 2005, a 100% increase. After that doubling, the soybean futures advance that had run from February 2005 to July 2005 reversed and prices declined.

The September 2005 soybean $8 out-of-the-money call expired worthless after implied volatility doubled.

Backtests across several commodities associated a 100% implied-volatility increase with a pause or reversal of the prevailing futures trend, except when external shocks such as war or severe weather intervened.

Soybean futures reversed after implied volatility doubled

Daily soybean futures from February through 14 September 2005. The spring–summer advance tops in July, the same window when implied volatility doubled from 25% to 50%, and the contract then gives back most of the rally, closing at the printed 569.2 cents. A trader who treated the uptrend as still intact would have been buying after the froth had already doubled. Closes were read from the source candlesticks against the printed 520–800 cents-per-bushel scale; the last print is the figure header, not a guess.
Daily soybean futures from February through 14 September 2005. The spring–summer advance tops in July, the same window when implied volatility doubled from 25% to 50%, and the contract then gives back most of the rally, closing at the printed 569.2 cents. A trader who treated the uptrend as still intact would have been buying after the froth had already doubled. Closes were read from the source candlesticks against the printed 520–800 cents-per-bushel scale; the last print is the figure header, not a guess.Soybean futures · Daily · 2005-02-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2005-09-14T00:00:00.000Z

Y-values other than the 14 September 2005 close of 569.2 are approximate to the nearest five cents. The source notes that a minority of 100% implied-volatility jumps fail to reverse when war or extreme weather dominates.

Other implied-volatility charts

A two-year lumber implied-volatility chart was shown with an implied-volatility close of 19.7% on 4/21/06. A two-year soybean implied-volatility chart was shown with an implied-volatility close of 23.1% on 1/21/06.

A two-year S&P 500 implied-volatility chart dated 4/21/06 closed at 10.9% and was described as opposite to the commodity examples, with resistance marking the end of a pullback.

Crude oil at archive time

The archive notes, at the time they were written, said crude-oil futures were rising while implied volatility was falling or not expanding to the levels seen during Katrina.

Comparing premium with historical volatility

TradersWeek editorial: option-premium analysis means reading whether option prices have become expensive or cheap relative to the current implied-volatility regime. Historical volatility is the realized price variability used as a baseline for judging whether implied volatility looks stretched.

TradersWeek editorial uses froth as a teaching metaphor for excess option premium that can evaporate after implied volatility expands sharply. In the archive soybean case, that evaporation is the September 2005 $8 out-of-the-money call expiring worthless after implied volatility doubled.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
17 of 31 in the Historical volatility analysis track
20071-5 pp.Next on Historical volatility analysisA butterfly reversal call when implied volatility sits near historical volatilityThe archive specified a bullish butterfly as pivots X-A-B-C-D, with B and C ideally in the 38% to 78% retracement bands and D finishing below X, often near a 1.27 to 1.62 extension of X-A.
All readings on this track · 31 readings
  1. 1985Putting listed option premiums in volatility-regime context
  2. 1988When volatility, not direction, selects the option spread
  3. 1988Path-aware volatility for option-replication cost
  4. 1989Option premium inside a volatility regime
  5. 1990Constructing consistent historical and implied volatility
  6. 1991Weekly close-to-close volatility as a horizon filter
  7. 1995A modified volatility construction for weeks-to-months regimes
  8. 1996Option smiles as a critique of constant volatility
  9. 1996Pairing short and long historical volatility for regime context
  10. 1998Normalized multi-horizon historical volatility construction
  11. 2001Park one options idea inside an implied and historical volatility regime
  12. 2002Constructing vertical spreads inside seasonal volatility regimes
  13. 2002Volatility regime context for option straddles
  14. 2003Option spread construction with volatility regime checks
  15. 2003Trend and volatility filters for option spread choice
  16. 2005Constructing vertical spreads inside volatility regimes
  17. 2006Implied volatility doubling as a commodity regime signal
  18. 2007A butterfly reversal call when implied volatility sits near historical volatility
  19. 2012Evaluate a broken-wing butterfly inside a volatility and premium regime
  20. 2012Regime-aware equity construction via carry and risk premium
  21. 2012True range overlays versus isolated bar context
  22. 2012Constructing regime context for option premium trades
  23. 2013Construct a ranked volatility switch before the trend filter fires
  24. 2013Combining Relative Strength Index, historical volatility, and Bollinger %b screens
  25. 2014A headline equity high is incomplete until the nominal-real spread is read
  26. 2015Daily implied volatility skew as a portfolio benchmark
  27. 2015Rebuild a volatility-skew template from size and slope
  28. 2015Evaluating concentrated winners with volatility and option premiums
  29. 2017Option book construction from implied volatility, historical volatility and premium
  30. 2018One-year volatility as the backdrop for short-horizon option trades
  31. 2019A low-volatility ETF sleeve inside a 2011 to 2019 market-regime case study
By fieldOptions and volatility171 readingsBy year200683 readings
All 47 readings tagged Historical volatility analysis
Also on Historical volatility analysis5 readings
1985Putting listed option premiums in volatility-regime contextOption premium analysis1988Path-aware volatility for option-replication costOption premium analysis1989Option premium inside a volatility regime1995A modified volatility construction for weeks-to-months regimesOption premium analysis1996Option smiles as a critique of constant volatilityOption premium analysis