2020issue C0359
Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
Competing marketplaces can list one another’s products, so a trading opportunity can appear as an equivalent listing in more than one place. Order routing compares those destinations and sends an executable order to a chosen execution venue.
- Competing marketplaces have begun listing one another’s products, so a trading opportunity can appear as an equivalent listing in more than one place.
- Order routing sends an executable order to a chosen marketplace after comparing available listings, activity, speed, and trading cost.
- One routing practice is to keep access to equivalent products on more than one marketplace, review the venue’s contract and trading details, and confirm that the broker can send directed flow to the selected destination.
- Implementation cost includes access pricing and destination quality, and trade documentation lets a later dispute be reconstructed against the sequence of events on that venue.
When a listing is no longer exclusive
Competing marketplaces have multiplied worldwide and have begun listing one another’s products, so a given trading opportunity can appear in more than one place.
A marketplace is no longer defined by a national border or a trading floor. It can exist as remote infrastructure rather than a physical location.
An equivalent listing is the same or closely substitutable product offered on more than one marketplace. An execution venue is a marketplace that lists the instrument and can receive, match, and document the order.
How execution venues differ
Marketplaces differentiate themselves through the products they list, the activity they attract, how quickly they handle orders, how they price access, and the protections they offer participants.
Wider choice among destinations has been described as putting downward pressure on transaction costs and ending exclusive control of listings by a single marketplace.
Sending directed flow to a chosen venue
Order routing means sending an executable order to a chosen marketplace after comparing available listings, activity, speed, and trading cost.
After identifying which marketplaces list a given instrument, the next step is to review that venue’s contract and trading details before the order is sent.
One routing practice is to maintain access to equivalent products on more than one marketplace and confirm that the broker can send the order to the selected destination. Directed flow is an instruction that the broker send the order to a specified venue rather than leaving the destination implicit.
Implementation cost is the cost of getting the order filled at the chosen venue, including access pricing and the quality of that destination.
Records that can reconstruct a dispute
Thorough trade records matter because they let later disputes be reconstructed against a documented sequence of events. Trade documentation supplies those records for the chosen execution venue.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
- 1988Why instant basket routing overwhelms specialist liquidity
- 2004Retail forex tickets as implementation-cost contracts
- 2005A two-gate liquidity filter for futures order routing
- 2006Manual after-hours routing and open-outcry fill risk
- 2010A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
- 2011Smart order routing, maker-taker, and midpoint execution costs
- 2012Compare equivalent listings before routing
- 2012Rebate-aware routing and execution cost
- 2012Platform routing, fees, and server-side stops
- 2013Compare equivalent listings, then route the order
- 2013Confirm routing, margin, and fill cost before a live forex order
- 2013Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
- 2014Order routing, pass-through rebates, and liquidity choice
- 2014Comparing exchange venues before routing the order
- 2014Selecting a futures broker as an execution-architecture problem
- 2014Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order
- 2015Routing orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venues
- 2015Forex venue checks for speed, margin, and implementation cost
- 2015Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
- 2016Route orders across competing exchange venues
- 2016Filter exchange venues before routing orders
- 2017Venue choice as an order-routing filter
- 2017Venue routing for equivalent listed contracts
- 2017Forex broker checks for fill speed, quote honor, and margin
- 2017Brokerage choice as an execution-speed and commission filter
- 2018Routing equivalent contracts across competing venues
- 2018Forex venue selection by fill speed, margin terms, and price honor
- 2019Forex execution filters for routing, cost, and liquidity
- 2020Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
- 2020Brokerage filters for routing, commissions, and liquidity