2016issue C0259
Filter exchange venues before routing orders
Venue routing works only after the trader keeps a short list of reachable exchanges that list an equivalent product and publish usable trade documentation. Remaining differences in volume, speed, pricing, and investor protections then become inputs for how the order is sent.
- Editorial: keep a venue only if it lists an equivalent product, publishes usable trade documentation, and the broker can actually reach it.
- A venue may be a remote matching facility rather than a national marketplace with a physical floor.
- Comparing equivalent products across venues is useful only if the broker can send the order to the selected venue.
- Extensive trade documentation helps reconstruct events and resolve disputes more quickly through the order life cycle.
Venue routing starts with a reachable list
The archive describes traders confronting many venues worldwide, including cases where similar products are listed on more than one exchange. A venue may exist as a remote matching facility rather than a national marketplace with a physical floor.
Venue routing is sending an order to a chosen exchange or matching facility rather than leaving venue selection implicit. An equivalent product is a listed instrument that is economically similar to another listing at a different venue.
Confirm the listing the venue will actually handle
Comparing equivalent products across venues is useful only if the broker can send the order to the selected venue. Traders should confirm the specifications of a trading vehicle at the venue that actually handles it.
Published venue directories can change after posting, and listed firms are responsible for their own entries.
Trade documentation stays useful after the fill
Extensive trade documentation helps reconstruct events and resolve disputes more quickly. Trade documentation is the venue record of events used to reconstruct a fill or settle a dispute.
The order life cycle is the period from order placement through routing, matching, confirmation, and any later dispute. Editorial: a venue that cannot produce usable trade documentation should drop out of the reachable set before cost and speed are compared.
Leftover differences become routing inputs
Venues compete on listed products, traded volume, speed, pricing, and investor protections. Wider venue choice has been associated with falling transaction costs.
Implementation cost is the transaction and friction costs incurred when an order is actually executed. Editorial: after the filter, use those remaining differences to decide how and where to send the order, while still accounting for implementation cost.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
- 1988Why instant basket routing overwhelms specialist liquidity
- 2004Retail forex tickets as implementation-cost contracts
- 2005A two-gate liquidity filter for futures order routing
- 2006Manual after-hours routing and open-outcry fill risk
- 2010A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
- 2011Smart order routing, maker-taker, and midpoint execution costs
- 2012Compare equivalent listings before routing
- 2012Rebate-aware routing and execution cost
- 2012Platform routing, fees, and server-side stops
- 2013Compare equivalent listings, then route the order
- 2013Confirm routing, margin, and fill cost before a live forex order
- 2013Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
- 2014Order routing, pass-through rebates, and liquidity choice
- 2014Comparing exchange venues before routing the order
- 2014Selecting a futures broker as an execution-architecture problem
- 2014Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order
- 2015Routing orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venues
- 2015Forex venue checks for speed, margin, and implementation cost
- 2015Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
- 2016Route orders across competing exchange venues
- 2016Filter exchange venues before routing orders
- 2017Venue choice as an order-routing filter
- 2017Venue routing for equivalent listed contracts
- 2017Forex broker checks for fill speed, quote honor, and margin
- 2017Brokerage choice as an execution-speed and commission filter
- 2018Routing equivalent contracts across competing venues
- 2018Forex venue selection by fill speed, margin terms, and price honor
- 2019Forex execution filters for routing, cost, and liquidity
- 2020Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
- 2020Brokerage filters for routing, commissions, and liquidity