2010issue C0169
A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
Ticket price, force-liquidation policy, and reachable venues decide whether the intended futures order survives the firm. Commission, day-trading margin, and order-routing belong in the same specification.
- When other factors are held equal, a higher commission reduces net trading profit or increases net loss.
- Day-trading margin can vanish after entry, and force-liquidation can remove hundreds or thousands of dollars even before a margin call.
- A commission difference of one or two dollars is described as sometimes buying a desk that will try to resolve a margin problem with the client instead of changing trades without consent.
- If the firm can route only electronic futures and options, option-spread work that needs open-outcry can be blocked when electronic market makers step aside.
The quote is an execution specification
The commission is the per-side or per-round-turn fee charged to clear and execute a futures or options order. Implementation-cost is the combined drag from those ticket fees, from wide quotes, from forced exits, and from missing venues on the result of an order.
When other factors are held equal, a higher commission reduces net trading profit or increases net loss. TradersWeek editorial: that comparison is incomplete unless force-liquidation policy and reachable venues sit in the same specification as the ticket price. Those three items decide whether the intended order survives the firm.
High and low commission still leave the desk unspecified
A clearing rate of $0.99 per side is described as buying almost no service, so the client must be self-sufficient and well funded. A rate of $100 per round turn is described as still failing to guarantee useful guidance, and some high-fee firms aim to collect as much as possible on the first engagement.
A commission difference of one or two dollars is described as sometimes buying a desk that will try to resolve a margin problem with the client instead of changing trades without consent.
Day-trading margin can trigger force-liquidation
Day-trading-margin is a reduced intraday collateral level that can vanish if account equity falls through a stated threshold. Deep-discount shops may post e-mini S&P day-trading margins near $500 per contract and force-liquidate if equity falls below that $500 line after a trade is opened with about $550.
Some low-commission firms may close short option positions without notice, before a margin call, and before the account is at immediate risk of a negative balance. Premature or unnecessary liquidation can remove hundreds or thousands of dollars from an account.
Short-option-drawdown is a decline in a short options account that some desks monitor poorly and may exit without a margin call. Firms retain the right to force-liquidate undermargined accounts, especially when the account could lose more than is on deposit.
Margin-management bounds account equity, exposure, and stop distance before entry and while the position is open so a drawdown does not trigger an unwanted exit.
Order-routing decides whether the order stays executable
Order-routing is choosing among electronic and alternative venues so an order remains executable through its life cycle. Some combined equity-and-futures broker-dealers can route only electronic futures and options, not open-outcry, which can block option-spread work that needs the floor.
Open-outcry is a non-electronic execution path used when electronic quotes are unusable or a strategy needs floor access. During high event risk, electronic options-on-futures market makers may step aside, widening displayed bids and offers, so an alternative execution path can determine whether an order remains workable.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
- 1988Why instant basket routing overwhelms specialist liquidity
- 2004Retail forex tickets as implementation-cost contracts
- 2005A two-gate liquidity filter for futures order routing
- 2006Manual after-hours routing and open-outcry fill risk
- 2010A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
- 2011Smart order routing, maker-taker, and midpoint execution costs
- 2012Compare equivalent listings before routing
- 2012Rebate-aware routing and execution cost
- 2012Platform routing, fees, and server-side stops
- 2013Compare equivalent listings, then route the order
- 2013Confirm routing, margin, and fill cost before a live forex order
- 2013Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
- 2014Order routing, pass-through rebates, and liquidity choice
- 2014Comparing exchange venues before routing the order
- 2014Selecting a futures broker as an execution-architecture problem
- 2014Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order
- 2015Routing orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venues
- 2015Forex venue checks for speed, margin, and implementation cost
- 2015Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
- 2016Route orders across competing exchange venues
- 2016Filter exchange venues before routing orders
- 2017Venue choice as an order-routing filter
- 2017Venue routing for equivalent listed contracts
- 2017Forex broker checks for fill speed, quote honor, and margin
- 2017Brokerage choice as an execution-speed and commission filter
- 2018Routing equivalent contracts across competing venues
- 2018Forex venue selection by fill speed, margin terms, and price honor
- 2019Forex execution filters for routing, cost, and liquidity
- 2020Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
- 2020Brokerage filters for routing, commissions, and liquidity