2015issue C0525
Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
After a listed futures exchange said it would close nearly all pit trading, venue routing sat inside implementation cost. The executable book is the one your symbol actually hits, a screen failure may have no second path, and a complex option package may still need an open-outcry broker.
- Venue routing is part of implementation cost: delay, slippage, and failed or halted fills begin after the decision to trade.
- A symbol split gives the electronic and open-outcry versions of one contract different ticker codes, so the book that can fill you is the one that symbol is sent to.
- Pit routing had been a backup when the exchange or a broker's screens failed. Without that path, a single halt leaves no alternate executable venue.
- Simple option buys and sells could already go to an electronic platform, but a high-volume multileg option spread was still often given to an open-outcry broker.
Side-by-side trading and the symbol split
In early 2015 a listed futures exchange said it would close pit trading for nearly all futures in Chicago and New York, while keeping the full-sized S&P 500 futures and most option pits. When the closure was announced, about 1% of the exchange's executed futures volume still matched in the pits, so a typical retail account was expected to see little or no change.
The full-sized S&P 500 futures had never been listed for electronic matching. Other products already used side-by-side trading, with a pit book and an electronic matcher open at once. Electronic and open-outcry versions of the same contract were given different symbols so traders could choose the venue. That symbol split later made product identification on platforms and quote boards confusing.
Some speculative flow had already left the full-sized S&P 500 pit for the electronically matched E-mini S&P 500 to avoid delay and slippage.
Implementation cost after the decision to trade
Implementation cost is the delay, slippage, and failed or halted fills incurred after the decision to trade. The 2015 commentary listed transparency, faster execution and fill reporting, and reduced slippage as stated advantages of electronic matching over the floor.
Open-outcry is floor matching by voice and hand signals inside a designated pit rather than a screen book. Pit routing had been a backup when the exchange or a broker's screens failed. Without that path, a single halt leaves no alternate executable venue.
When a package still went to a floor desk
Simple option buys and sells could already be sent to an electronic platform. High-volume multileg option packages were still often given to an open-outcry broker. A multileg option spread is a package of option legs that must be filled together rather than as separate simple buys or sells.
Editorial: venue routing is the choice of which matching engine or floor desk actually receives and fills the order. Choosing the symbol is choosing the book. If that book is the only remaining path, a halt or a package the screen cannot work as one order is part of the cost of getting the trade done.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
- 1988Why instant basket routing overwhelms specialist liquidity
- 2004Retail forex tickets as implementation-cost contracts
- 2005A two-gate liquidity filter for futures order routing
- 2006Manual after-hours routing and open-outcry fill risk
- 2010A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
- 2011Smart order routing, maker-taker, and midpoint execution costs
- 2012Compare equivalent listings before routing
- 2012Rebate-aware routing and execution cost
- 2012Platform routing, fees, and server-side stops
- 2013Compare equivalent listings, then route the order
- 2013Confirm routing, margin, and fill cost before a live forex order
- 2013Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
- 2014Order routing, pass-through rebates, and liquidity choice
- 2014Comparing exchange venues before routing the order
- 2014Selecting a futures broker as an execution-architecture problem
- 2014Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order
- 2015Routing orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venues
- 2015Forex venue checks for speed, margin, and implementation cost
- 2015Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
- 2016Route orders across competing exchange venues
- 2016Filter exchange venues before routing orders
- 2017Venue choice as an order-routing filter
- 2017Venue routing for equivalent listed contracts
- 2017Forex broker checks for fill speed, quote honor, and margin
- 2017Brokerage choice as an execution-speed and commission filter
- 2018Routing equivalent contracts across competing venues
- 2018Forex venue selection by fill speed, margin terms, and price honor
- 2019Forex execution filters for routing, cost, and liquidity
- 2020Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
- 2020Brokerage filters for routing, commissions, and liquidity