2013issue C1163
Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
The historical workflow screened brokers first by whether they handle the intended instrument, then compared implementation cost through commissions, execution speed, data, and support. Research extras and most-viewed click lists were secondary to order routing and fund custody.
- Screen first for whether the firm handles the intended instrument, because that decides if order routing can occur at all.
- After choosing full-service brokerage or discount brokerage, compare implementation cost through commissions, execution speed, real-time data, market access, and support.
- Treat retail research extras as less central where company information is freely available online, while still weighing commercial market information in futures-style markets.
- A most-viewed list ordered by website clicks is not a rating; fund-safety checks still include clearing operations and, for equities, investor-protection coverage.
Start with the instrument and the account type
Self-directed traders were described as having more brokerage options than before when searching for speed, pricing efficiency, and sound accounting. A first screen is whether the firm handles the intended instrument.
After that check, the remaining choice is between a full-service brokerage and a discount brokerage. Full-service brokerage means an advised relationship in which the client works with a professional rather than placing orders independently online. Discount brokerage means a self-directed online account that typically supplies execution and accounting without professional trading advice. Many institutions that offer full-service brokerage also offer a discount-brokerage option.
Weigh implementation cost after the routing screen
Comparison items named for brokerage choice include tools and services, real-time data, market access, account minimums, execution speed, commissions, and support.
Editorial interpretation: treat those items as the implementation-cost layer of the filter. Implementation cost is the combined effect of commissions, data, fill speed, and related frictions that determine what it costs to complete an order. Order routing is the path an order takes from the trader through the brokerage to a market or matching venue, which is why market access and execution speed belong with commissions rather than with brand extras.
Keep research extras and click lists secondary
Freely available company information online is said to have reduced the relative value of retail brokerage research. In less intensively studied but highly commercial markets such as futures, commercial market information from a brokerage, including market statistics, hedging-activity reports, and other commercial information, may still be material to decisions.
A most-viewed brokerage list ordered by website clicks is explicitly not an editorial rating or ranking.
Check clearing operations and investor-protection coverage
Fund-safety due diligence includes asking about clearing operations. Clearing operations are the post-trade process that settles transactions and holds client funds after execution. For equities, the same due diligence includes investor-protection coverage through Securities Investor Protection Corp., a statutory equities-account safeguard that addresses custody risk if a brokerage fails.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
- 1988Why instant basket routing overwhelms specialist liquidity
- 2004Retail forex tickets as implementation-cost contracts
- 2005A two-gate liquidity filter for futures order routing
- 2006Manual after-hours routing and open-outcry fill risk
- 2010A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
- 2011Smart order routing, maker-taker, and midpoint execution costs
- 2012Compare equivalent listings before routing
- 2012Rebate-aware routing and execution cost
- 2012Platform routing, fees, and server-side stops
- 2013Compare equivalent listings, then route the order
- 2013Confirm routing, margin, and fill cost before a live forex order
- 2013Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
- 2014Order routing, pass-through rebates, and liquidity choice
- 2014Comparing exchange venues before routing the order
- 2014Selecting a futures broker as an execution-architecture problem
- 2014Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order
- 2015Routing orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venues
- 2015Forex venue checks for speed, margin, and implementation cost
- 2015Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
- 2016Route orders across competing exchange venues
- 2016Filter exchange venues before routing orders
- 2017Venue choice as an order-routing filter
- 2017Venue routing for equivalent listed contracts
- 2017Forex broker checks for fill speed, quote honor, and margin
- 2017Brokerage choice as an execution-speed and commission filter
- 2018Routing equivalent contracts across competing venues
- 2018Forex venue selection by fill speed, margin terms, and price honor
- 2019Forex execution filters for routing, cost, and liquidity
- 2020Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
- 2020Brokerage filters for routing, commissions, and liquidity