Skip to main content
Track Order routing
16 / 30
Library

2014issue C1141

Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order

The archive treats extra commission as potentially smaller than implementation-cost from a placement error. The order still has to reach the right listing, the right side, and an exit that exists after a limit-lock.

  • A commission-filter ranks posted ticket cost first, but implementation-cost from a thin listing, a mis-keyed side, or an unexit-able lock can be the larger line.
  • Order-routing still has to select the contract, expiration, side, and instruction type the venue will accept.
  • A liquidity-filter belongs before the send; one observation day showed nearly 37,000 March world sugar contracts against five in the same-month domestic listing.
  • In a limit-lock, a sell may still be accepted while a buy cannot, so a short opened into the lock can stay open into the next session.
Entries in this reading3 entries

The ticket is not the trade

A commission-filter uses posted ticket cost as the first screen when choosing who places an order and how closely it is watched. Full-service and broker-assisted desks are described as combining order placement, market guidance, and margin-call handling, at a higher commission than unassisted routing. The column treats that extra commission as potentially smaller than the implementation-cost of placement errors a supervised desk is meant to catch.

Implementation-cost is the extra paid or lost from a thin listing, a mis-keyed side, or an unexit-able lock, beyond the posted commission. The posted fee is only the visible line on the ticket.

Unassisted routing still has homework

Self-directed online placement is framed as a commission-saving path that still requires knowledge of symbols, listed months, and risk calculation, plus the ability to avoid impulsive extra trades. Discount online service is reserved for traders who can operate with little help from the firm.

Recurring placement errors listed include the wrong year or month, the opposite side, ignored session hours, and mixing up stop-order and limit-order instructions. Order-routing is selecting the contract, expiration, side, and instruction type that the venue will actually accept. A stop-order becomes executable only after a trigger price is reached. A limit-order will not trade worse than a stated price and may not trade at all.

Volume is part of the ticket

Routing a single contract into the thinner domestic sugar listing rather than the more active world listing is described as a liquidity mistake that can cost several hundred dollars. On the observation day, March world sugar volume was nearly 37,000 contracts versus five contracts in same-month domestic sugar.

A liquidity-filter checks traded volume and book depth before sending size into a listing. The archive presents the two sugar listings as the same month with very different activity, and the thinner one as the costly routing choice.

A lock can accept the short and refuse the buy

When a market is locked limit-up, a sell may still be accepted while a buy cannot. A short initiated into that limit-lock can remain open into the next session if prices continue higher.

The archive is not forecasting the next session. It is showing that a limit-lock can leave a newly opened short without a buy that the venue will accept.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
16 of 30 in the Order routing track
201559-59 pp.Next on Order routingRouting orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venuesWhen an equivalent listing exists, identify every venue that can accept the order before sending it, including remote electronic facilities.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
  1. 1988Why instant basket routing overwhelms specialist liquidity
  2. 2004Retail forex tickets as implementation-cost contracts
  3. 2005A two-gate liquidity filter for futures order routing
  4. 2006Manual after-hours routing and open-outcry fill risk
  5. 2010A futures brokerage quote is an execution specification
  6. 2011Smart order routing, maker-taker, and midpoint execution costs
  7. 2012Compare equivalent listings before routing
  8. 2012Rebate-aware routing and execution cost
  9. 2012Platform routing, fees, and server-side stops
  10. 2013Compare equivalent listings, then route the order
  11. 2013Confirm routing, margin, and fill cost before a live forex order
  12. 2013Brokerage choice as an execution-cost and routing filter
  13. 2014Order routing, pass-through rebates, and liquidity choice
  14. 2014Comparing exchange venues before routing the order
  15. 2014Selecting a futures broker as an execution-architecture problem
  16. 2014Commission shopping is the wrong first filter for a futures order
  17. 2015Routing orders when equivalent products trade on multiple venues
  18. 2015Forex venue checks for speed, margin, and implementation cost
  19. 2015Backup venues and symbol splits in futures routing
  20. 2016Route orders across competing exchange venues
  21. 2016Filter exchange venues before routing orders
  22. 2017Venue choice as an order-routing filter
  23. 2017Venue routing for equivalent listed contracts
  24. 2017Forex broker checks for fill speed, quote honor, and margin
  25. 2017Brokerage choice as an execution-speed and commission filter
  26. 2018Routing equivalent contracts across competing venues
  27. 2018Forex venue selection by fill speed, margin terms, and price honor
  28. 2019Forex execution filters for routing, cost, and liquidity
  29. 2020Routing equivalent listings across competing exchanges
  30. 2020Brokerage filters for routing, commissions, and liquidity
All 65 readings tagged Order routing
Also on Order routing5 readings