Skip to main content
Track Gann angles
1 / 34
Library

1984issue C031-5

Range grid to sideways break in 1984 gold

On the June 1984 gold contract, a monthly high-to-low span first marked resistance near 412, 418, and 423.75. The short was refused until a strong outside-day failed to follow through and the 404.50 to 413 shelf broke, so the stop sat on that structure rather than on the original grid.

  • Support-resistance from a completed monthly high-to-low span, plus its natural-range-division levels, marks the first stall cluster before any trade is considered.
  • A strong-closing outside-day that is not continued is only an early warning. Later sessions inside that bar are sideways-distribution until the decision-range breaks.
  • The gann-angles stance waits for confirmed demand-failure after the low rather than selling the rally high, and treats only that intervening swing as the intended interval.
  • The stop-loss sits beyond the opposite side of the decision-range and is later trailed above swing highs, so risk is bounded by structure rather than by the original grid.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Two clocks on one contract

The June 1984 gold contract used support-resistance from a completed monthly high-to-low span to locate where an advance might stall before any trade was considered. The stated method was then a gann-angles stance: wait for a confirmed failure after a low rather than selling the print high, and treat only the intervening swing as the intended interval.

Editorial reading: treat that sequence as two clocks. Clock one marks the first monthly-range resistance cluster in advance. Clock two refuses the short until a strong outside-day fails to follow through and the resulting sideways shelf breaks. The stop-loss can then sit on that structure rather than on the original grid.

Mark the monthly-range cluster first

For the June 1984 gold contract, the July 1983 monthly high at 473.50 and the January 1984 monthly low at 374 defined a 99.50 range used to project later resistance.

From that range, candidate resistance was placed at the 0.382 division near 412, the 0.50 division at 423.75, and the midpoint of those two divisions near 418. Those prints are natural-range-division levels: candidate stalls from fixed fractions of a major monthly range, including the midpoint between two adjacent fractions when the actual turn is not expected to sit exactly on either one.

A bounce from 374 was treated as a correction of an oversold decline, with the first expected resistance cluster at 412, 418, or 423.75. Reactions at 412 and 418 were viewed as a possible reversal zone, but exiting longs or opening a short was deferred until further evidence of demand-failure.

Refuse the short until the shelf breaks

A strong-closing outside-day on 8 March was followed by no continuation on 9 March. An outside-day is a session whose range contains the prior day and whose close is judged for whether demand is still expanding. The lack of follow-through was treated as an early warning rather than an immediate signal.

On 12 and 13 March, three sessions remained inside the 8 March outside-day range. That pause is sideways-distribution: several sessions that remain inside a prior wide-range bar after a stall, treated as temporary balance until a break of that band assigns control to supply or demand. The 404.50 to 413 band was then treated as the decision-range, the tight band left by the stall whose upside break is read as continuation and whose downside break is read as justification for a short.

An upside break of that band would have been read as continuation of the January advance. A downside break would have been read as supply regaining control and as grounds for a short.

On 14 March, prices opened higher, failed above 410, broke the distribution range toward 400, then rallied back to about 404. That sequence was treated as intra-day demand-failure and a chance to sell near 404. Demand-failure is a sequence in which a strong upside effort is not continued and a nearby support shelf then gives way, read as buyers losing control.

Keep the stop on structure

After that short, a stop-loss was placed at 416, above the 413 range high, for a 12-point risk. The stop-loss was a predefined exit beyond the opposite side of the decision-range, later trailed above later swing highs so risk stayed bounded after entry. It was then kept above later highs near 409.70 and 413 while price consolidated between 400 and 404.50.

The stated method was a Gann-style wait for a confirmed low-side failure rather than a sale at the rally high, with a plan to cover if a later reversal formed above the 374 to 380 area. Editorial note: the monthly-range grid located the stall. The decision-range located both the short and the stop.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
1 of 34 in the Gann angles track
19851-16 pp.Next on Gann anglesWhen Gann lines, Gann angles, and a Fibonacci retracement coincideGann lines and Gann angles are complementary forward support and resistance constructions: equal horizontal divisions of a completed price space versus sloping rates projected from a prior pivot.
All readings on this track · 34 readings
  1. 1984Range grid to sideways break in 1984 gold
  2. 1985When Gann lines, Gann angles, and a Fibonacci retracement coincide
  3. 1987Evaluating angular cycle overlays on independent stock swings
  4. 1988Multi-scale Elliott counts with Gann and Fibonacci confluence
  5. 1988Gann angles as hand-scaled chart geometry
  6. 1989A time, price, and pattern filter on one platinum sequence
  7. 1989Gann angles on point-and-figure grids
  8. 1990Gann price-time clusters for Elliott retracements
  9. 1990Channel regimes and Gann angle hinges
  10. 1990A gold campaign log as a trade procedure
  11. 1991A fourth Treasury bond resistance test as one time-price hypothesis
  12. 1991An eclipse calendar as a testable cycle scaffold
  13. 1992Gann-angle intersections and half-range zones
  14. 1998Wave and ratio self-similarity as a testable chart hypothesis
  15. 2000Constructing Gann fan angles from swing extremes
  16. 2002Combining Fibonacci retracement, Gann angles, and the moving average in FX
  17. 2002Halfway retracement as a trend confirmation filter
  18. 2006Volume distribution, Fibonacci extensions, and Gann angles on one downswing
  19. 2007Constructing Gann fans as currency support and resistance
  20. 2010ABC completion, wave-two windows, and Gann ratios
  21. 2010Constructing a Gann, Fibonacci, and decade-scale reversal cluster
  22. 2010Gann angles as timed tests that still need structure and RSI
  23. 2010Gann angles heritage is not a signal
  24. 2010Gann-fan time windows confirmed by Elliott-wave position
  25. 2010Gann angles as a repeatable chart hypothesis
  26. 2011Wave and ratio overlays as confirmation, not forecasts
  27. 2013Gold wave four as a time and price cluster check
  28. 2014A case study that separates cycle forecasts from Gann and Elliott readings
  29. 2014Relative charting, Gann angles, and trendline breakouts
  30. 2016Gann fans and a 2016 long-wave case as checkpoints, not forecasts
  31. 2017Gann angles, scale dependence, and the gap between legend and method
  32. 2017Gann angles as overlay, not original practice
  33. 2018Combine Gann angles, oscillator zones, and a protective stop
  34. 2020Confirming Gann hi-lo swings with ADX and stochastics
All 47 readings tagged Gann angles
Also on Gann angles5 readings