2017issue C0727
How residency rules raise futures implementation costs
A 2017 account of Canadian-resident futures access shows a cross-border-onboarding-barrier locking traders onto a thinner, more expensive path. Editorial: commission-analysis should treat legal broker access as the first filter, because the payable round-turn, not the displayed book, decides whether the order is implementable.
- Editorial: run commission-analysis only after asking which desks are allowed to hold the account. A route no permitted desk can work is not executable, whatever the displayed book shows.
- By 2017 a US commodity broker without a Canadian branch was nearly unable to accept new Canadian accounts or keep existing ones, including relationships longer than a decade.
- One former Canadian phone-order client could not find a domestic broker who would take those orders for less than 100 dollars round-turn, versus 15 dollars previously charged by the US broker.
- Canadians seeking US commodity access were described as generally facing higher commissions, less capable service, or both, because fewer competing desks could legally hold the account.
Legal access comes first
Editorial: treat legal broker access as the first filter in commission-analysis. Before modeling spread, size, or auction timing, ask which desks are even allowed to hold the account.
Commission-analysis uses order-book, spread, volume, auction, and trading-cost inputs over the life of an order to decide whether a route is executable after implementation-cost. Implementation-cost is the commission, service, and onboarding friction required to get an intended futures or options order actually worked by an available broker.
The archive describes a historical workflow. TradersWeek interpretation: when a cross-border-onboarding-barrier locks a trader onto a thinner, more expensive path, the payable round-turn, not the displayed book, decides whether the order is implementable.
From an unsolicited-account-letter to a hard stop
In 2004 a US commodity broker could still open Canadian-resident accounts after extra paperwork and a client letter confirming the contact was unsolicited. That unsolicited-account-letter was a client-written confirmation that the account seeker initiated contact and was not solicited.
By 2017 a US commodity broker without a Canadian branch was described as nearly unable to accept new Canadian accounts or keep existing ones, including relationships longer than a decade. The same desk reported onboarding clients from countries such as Austria, China, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Jordan while being unable to transact with Canadian residents.
A commission-paid US broker reported turning away prospective Canadian customers several times per month solely because of residency.
The branch-office-exception
A Canadian-resident exception existed only for US-headquartered firms that already ran a local branch. The branch-office-exception lets a foreign-headquartered broker serve local residents only if it already operates an in-country office. Smaller brokerages treated that office as a financial and compliance deal-breaker.
The payable round-turn
One former Canadian phone-order client could not find a domestic broker who would take those orders for less than 100 dollars round-turn, versus 15 dollars previously charged by the US broker. A round-turn is the commission charged to open and close one futures or options position.
Canadians seeking US commodity access were described as generally facing higher commissions, less capable service, or both, because fewer competing desks could legally hold the account.
All readings on this track · 32 readings
- 1985Matching ticket size to negotiable commission schedules
- 1985Minimum tickets can price a small book out of its own exit
- 1992Stop-order slippage as an execution cost filter
- 1993Cost-aware walk-forward evaluation of pattern-detector signals
- 2001Audit high-turnover operating conditions as one procedure
- 2002Front-load futures commission and slippage
- 2005Inactive account fees as hidden implementation cost
- 2010A pre-trade liquidity screen for futures contracts
- 2011Currency option venues, spreads, clearing, and premium cost
- 2012Filter futures contracts by liquidity and implementation cost
- 2012Futures commission versus one tick of cost
- 2012Ranking futures liquidity for executable orders
- 2013Filter option day trades by spread, volume, and fees
- 2013Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and effective margin
- 2014Book futures data fees as implementation cost
- 2015Use a futures liquidity rank as a pre-trade checklist
- 2015Filter unexecutable futures by liquidity, open interest, and margin
- 2015Futures liquidity ranking as an execution filter
- 2015Filtering option trades by bid-ask width
- 2016Exchange quote fees as execution costs and liquidity filters
- 2016Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and margin cost
- 2016Comparing dollar-index futures execution costs and liquidity
- 2016A futures liquidity ranking as a screen for executable orders
- 2017Filter a futures board by liquidity, open interest, and implementation cost
- 2017Filter futures contracts by liquidity and margin cost
- 2017How residency rules raise futures implementation costs
- 2018Screen listed futures by liquidity, open interest, and margin
- 2018Contract selection is the first filter on competing bitcoin futures
- 2018Filter futures execution by liquidity and margin
- 2018Commission analysis for brokerage execution costs
- 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you size the order
- 2020Brokerage selection as an implementation-cost problem