Skip to main content
Track Commission analysis
15 / 32
Library

2014issue C0515

Book futures data fees as implementation cost

From March 1, 2014, new nonprofessional futures accounts paid about 3 to 15 dollars a month for electronic live-data access, while professional users were expected to face several hundred to several thousand dollars per user. Commission analysis books both charges as implementation-cost inputs because they change who watches the book, how thinly a desk is staffed, and how leftover fixed costs return as commissions.

  • Newly opened nonprofessional accounts were charged about 3 to 15 dollars per month for live-data access on electronic platforms, while orders sent through a full-service broker or trade desk were not billed that charge.
  • Nonprofessional accounts already open and active before March 1, 2014 received a waiver of the extra data charge until January 2015.
  • The professional-user levy was expected at several hundred to several thousand dollars per user per month and was argued to cut broker capacity through closures and hiring restraint.
  • Fewer brokers and fewer participants were projected to lower contract volume and force remaining fixed costs into higher per-account commissions and other brokerage charges.
Entries in this reading1 entry

A split in who pays for the book

From March 1, 2014, newly opened nonprofessional accounts in futures were charged about 3 to 15 dollars per month for live-data access: real-time quotes, charts, and depth-of-market panels on an electronic platform. A nonprofessional account is a retail futures account used other than as a sole source of income, and therefore subject to the venue's lighter retail data schedule.

That monthly live-data charge applied only to electronic platform access. Traders who sent orders through a full-service broker or trade desk were not billed for it. Live-data access meant electronic platform rights rather than broker-mediated order placement.

Nonprofessional accounts that were already open and active before March 1, 2014 received a waiver of the extra data charge until January 2015.

Professional-user levy and thinner desks

Professional users such as brokers, trade-desk clerks, and commodity trading advisors were expected to face several hundred to several thousand dollars per user per month. That professional-user levy is the much higher monthly per-user data charge applied to brokers, desk clerks, advisors, and similar industry staff.

The commentary argued that the professional-side levy could put small brokerages out of business and deter larger firms from hiring. Thinner brokerage staffs were described as producing longer hold times, slower responses, and less knowledgeable support for accounts of every size. Broker capacity is the headcount and expertise a firm can keep on the desk after professional data costs rise.

Fixed-cost reallocation after volume falls

Fewer brokers and fewer participants were projected to lower contract volume and force remaining fixed costs into higher per-account commissions and other brokerage charges. Fixed-cost reallocation is the process by which industry-wide data and overhead burdens get spread across fewer remaining accounts as higher per-trader charges.

The retail fee was framed as an annoyance rather than an exit trigger for committed traders, but as enough friction to steer some casual participants toward forex or equity exchange-traded funds instead of listed commodities.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
15 of 32 in the Commission analysis track
201556-56 pp.Next on Commission analysisUse a futures liquidity rank as a pre-trade checklistApply a liquidity-filter first: activity dots, open interest, and volume must support the intended order, and a single marker or none is treated as thin activity.
All readings on this track · 32 readings
  1. 1985Matching ticket size to negotiable commission schedules
  2. 1985Minimum tickets can price a small book out of its own exit
  3. 1992Stop-order slippage as an execution cost filter
  4. 1993Cost-aware walk-forward evaluation of pattern-detector signals
  5. 2001Audit high-turnover operating conditions as one procedure
  6. 2002Front-load futures commission and slippage
  7. 2005Inactive account fees as hidden implementation cost
  8. 2010A pre-trade liquidity screen for futures contracts
  9. 2011Currency option venues, spreads, clearing, and premium cost
  10. 2012Filter futures contracts by liquidity and implementation cost
  11. 2012Futures commission versus one tick of cost
  12. 2012Ranking futures liquidity for executable orders
  13. 2013Filter option day trades by spread, volume, and fees
  14. 2013Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and effective margin
  15. 2014Book futures data fees as implementation cost
  16. 2015Use a futures liquidity rank as a pre-trade checklist
  17. 2015Filter unexecutable futures by liquidity, open interest, and margin
  18. 2015Futures liquidity ranking as an execution filter
  19. 2015Filtering option trades by bid-ask width
  20. 2016Exchange quote fees as execution costs and liquidity filters
  21. 2016Filter futures by liquidity, open interest, and margin cost
  22. 2016Comparing dollar-index futures execution costs and liquidity
  23. 2016A futures liquidity ranking as a screen for executable orders
  24. 2017Filter a futures board by liquidity, open interest, and implementation cost
  25. 2017Filter futures contracts by liquidity and margin cost
  26. 2017How residency rules raise futures implementation costs
  27. 2018Screen listed futures by liquidity, open interest, and margin
  28. 2018Contract selection is the first filter on competing bitcoin futures
  29. 2018Filter futures execution by liquidity and margin
  30. 2018Commission analysis for brokerage execution costs
  31. 2019Ranking futures liquidity before you size the order
  32. 2020Brokerage selection as an implementation-cost problem
All 37 readings tagged Commission analysis
Also on Commission analysis5 readings