2006issue C051-3
Constructing bearish point-and-figure support breaks
A bearish point-and-figure signal is assembled in sequence: classify how support is retested, name the column that prints through that box, and convert the width of the preceding congestion into a downside objective.
- On a point-and-figure grid, repeated failed selloffs at one support box remain a bottom-retest structure until a later column prints through that box.
- A triple-low is two declines that stop at the same support and a third that prints below it. A spread-triple-low delays that break after a failed third selloff and a brief recovery.
- A descending-triple-low lowers each new low by one box, and a declining support line can extend that construction across more than three columns.
- After a consolidation-to-impulse sequence, the horizontal-count turns the number of consolidation columns into a vertical price objective from the breakout price.
A bearish signal starts with the grid
Point-and-figure is a non-time grid that records directional X and O columns on a fixed box size so repeated tests of a price level stay visible. A box is the minimum price increment required to plot a new X or O on the grid.
Editorial construction sequence: classify how support is retested, name the column that actually breaks it, and convert the width of the preceding congestion into a falsifiable downside objective.
Classify how support is retested
The bearish form of a double-top-bottom on this grid is a repeated test of the same low. Repeated failed selloffs at one support box form that bottom-retest structure.
The retest becomes a breakout signal only when a later column prints through that box. Until that print, the construction is still a defended support level, not a downside signal.
Name the column that breaks support
A breakout is the first column that prints through a previously defended support or trend line and turns the setup into a downside signal.
A triple-low is constructed from two consecutive declines that stop at the same support, then a third decline that prints below that support. In that construction, the named breaking column is the third decline.
One sterling/dollar construction held a six-box range from 1.4690 to 1.4740 until the third support attack broke 1.4690.
Delayed and descending support attacks
A spread-triple-low is constructed when the third consecutive selloff fails to break support, a brief recovery follows, and a later decline then breaks the same level. The named breaking column is that later decline, not the failed third selloff.
A descending-triple-low is constructed when each new selloff makes a lower low by one box and the third slide accelerates.
One descending-triple construction printed consecutive lower lows at 120.00 and 119.80, then a third low 20 pips lower at 119.60 before the break.
When more than three columns are involved
A downward break of a declining support line extends the descending-triple construction by using more than three declining columns before the line gives way. The named breakout is still the first column that prints through that line.
A downward break of rising bullish support is framed as a construction that leaves remaining longs on the wrong side after an unexpected reversal.
Turn congestion width into a downside objective
After a consolidation-to-impulse sequence, the horizontal-count converts the number of consolidation columns into a vertical price objective measured from the breakout price.
The projection takes the width of a consolidation, in columns, and plots that same distance vertically from the breakout box.
One euro/sterling horizontal-count construction used a consolidation width of 12 and projected a downside move of the same 12-box distance.
All readings on this track · 30 readings
- 1988Constructing trend definitions with filters and lines
- 1989Reversal count as the clock on point-and-figure charts
- 1989Point-and-figure setup and session-average entry windows
- 1989Two-scale point-and-figure trendlines and stop placement
- 1989Adjusted net asset value, tighter reversals, and written stops on a fund point-and-figure chart
- 1990Stack option odds after point-and-figure signals
- 1991Constructing a point-and-figure downtrend-break
- 1991Constructing point-and-figure box and reversal charts
- 1991Constructing a close-tested one-two ladder on a point-and-figure chart
- 1992Point-and-figure, breadth, and volume as falsifiable hypotheses
- 1992Three-gate stock selection with ranks and point and figure
- 1993Constructing combined stochastics and point-and-figure relative strength
- 1997Point-and-figure box scale and reversal construction
- 2000Cotton weekly point-and-figure: late-stage decline, named weekly close
- 2000Constructing point-and-figure charts for support, resistance, and breakouts
- 2001Swiss franc: seasonal permission and a weekly point-and-figure breakout
- 2001Constructing point-and-figure boxes and reversals
- 2002Point-and-figure construction: box, live column, and three-box reversal
- 2003E-mini point-and-figure box-size and a descending-triangle breakout
- 2003A reconstruction critique of point-and-figure daytrading
- 2004Point-and-figure column moving-average crossovers
- 2005Box-series transforms for trend and channel work
- 2006Constructing bearish point-and-figure support breaks
- 2008Point-and-figure forex breakouts and triangles
- 2012From tactile charts to written trade rules
- 2013Combine a Point and figure chart and Moving-average crossover inside one System optimization procedure
- 2015Point-and-figure time and volume limits are conventions to test
- 2016Measurement-first critique of indicator defaults
- 2017Point-and-figure construction, reversals, and column-based overlays
- 2019A 2019 charting case as a three-check trend classroom