Skip to main content
Track Tape reading
3 / 20
Library

2001issue C041-2

Ticket charges, internalization, and hidden size on the tape

A posted ticket such as $14.95 on a 1,000-share intention is not the true per-share-cost if that intention prints two, three, or four times and each print is billed separately. Internalization can leave the paid offer on the screen, and displayed-size can hide a larger working order.

  • A posted ticket-charge on a 1,000-share intention is not the true per-share-cost if that intention prints two, three, or four times and each print is billed separately.
  • Reluctance to pay a second ticket-charge can delay an exit when the tape weakens. A later half-point move on 200 shares, or $100, can exceed the fee being avoided, and both tickets are still due.
  • A retail customer typically cannot choose the execution venue. Internalization can fill a buy away from the displayed offer and leave the paid price still advertised.
  • When 1,000 shares are advertised at $51 and several prints of 1,000 shares or more pass without the offer vanishing, displayed-size is not a complete map of remaining supply.
Entries in this reading3 entries

What the ticket-charge actually bills

A posted ticket such as $14.95 on a 1,000-share intention is not the true per-share-cost if that intention prints two, three, or four times and each print is billed separately. A ticket-charge is a flat fee billed per execution report rather than per share, and it can repeat when one intention is filled in several prints.

Under typical retail ticket pricing, 100-share or 200-share orders can pay the full ticket-charge on a size that would cost about $1 per 100 shares on a professional per-share schedule. Commission-analysis compares those billed fees with intended size, number of fills, and the cost of delaying an exit.

Delay, buying power, and the second ticket

Reluctance to pay a second ticket-charge after entry can delay an exit when the tape weakens. A later move, illustrated as another half point on 200 shares, or $100, can exceed the fee being avoided, and both tickets are still due.

On a 60,000-share daily pace over 20 sessions, a one-cent change in per-share-cost equals 1.2 million shares and $12,000 in that period arithmetic.

A 2,000-share block in a $50 name requires about $100,000 of buying power, so a $25,000 cash account with about $50,000 of daytime margin can force a sell-before-buy sequence instead of holding several names at once.

Venue choice and leftover quotes

Retail so-called direct access may reach electronic communication networks only with restrictions and still omit unfiltered listed-exchange routing. A pre-trade capital check can also block an oversized keystroke that a licensed professional desk would let stand.

A retail customer typically cannot choose the execution venue. The firm may pair opposing market orders, buy from one customer and sell to another at different prices, send the order out, or sell a limit order to another firm.

Internalization is that path: a firm pairing customer orders, trading against them, or otherwise filling them away from the public book. Order-routing is the post-submission path of an order, including internalization, sale of flow, restricted electronic-book access, and exchange routing.

If a buy meant to take out a displayed offer is executed away from that quote, the offer can remain on the screen, leaving the paid price still advertised and blocking an immediate sale at a higher print.

Prints versus displayed-size

When 1,000 shares are advertised at $51 and several prints of 1,000 shares or more pass without the offer vanishing, the tape is consistent with larger hidden size in the crowd or a reserve order on an electronic book.

An electronic offer can display 1,000 shares while 5,000 are working, so displayed-size alone is not a complete map of remaining supply. Tape-reading infers hidden or leftover supply from sequential prints versus the size still shown on the quote.

A lift-the-offer buy takes the full advertised ask, so that offer should leave the quote if that liquidity was actually taken. Sequential prints that leave the same offer in place are consistent with leftover working size, not a completed take of the advertised liquidity.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
3 of 20 in the Tape reading track
20031-2 pp.Next on Tape readingOpening auction indications, premium and print sizeA cash-versus-futures residual is compared with published fair value so the premium or discount is known before any order is placed.
All readings on this track · 20 readings
  1. 1986Open outcry hand signals as order routing
  2. 1989Finishing a market order in a first index-pit session
  3. 2001Ticket charges, internalization, and hidden size on the tape
  4. 2003Opening auction indications, premium and print size
  5. 2003Listed open order routing and the short-sale tape
  6. 2003Opening indication, one-sided envelope, and the sector tape check
  7. 2003Opening auction fills and the post-print tape
  8. 2004Specialist prints, opening exits and live tape filters
  9. 2005A tape-reading case study of support, resistance, and breakout confirmation
  10. 2005Tape flips versus idle capital: a process critique
  11. 2005Read the tape, name the liquidity job, then route for price
  12. 2006Fill entitlement, hybrid routing, and pairs sequencing
  13. 2006Alerts over resting stops, with tape-reading at the exit
  14. 2006When crowd levels diverge from Fibonacci support
  15. 2008Perfect prints before the chart
  16. 2008Hidden size, tape delay, and pairs shorts belong in the trade rule
  17. 2010Inside the spread: why OHLC bars hide the buy-sell shift
  18. 2010Specialist pair books sized for dividends and tape
  19. 2016Tape reading as judgment under distraction
  20. 2018Tape-reading breakouts with increment stops
All 21 readings tagged Tape reading
Also on Tape reading5 readings