Skip to main content
Track Industry rotation
13 / 23
Library

2008issue C111-4

Country and sector weights in an Africa regional-sleeve

Archive listed-wrappers from 2007 and 2008 placed Africa and Middle East and Africa labels on a handful of hosts and on bank, resource, energy, and telecom sector-stacks. The construction audit asks whether the regional-sleeve is a distinct growth-and-liquidity regime or those same exposures under a continent name.

  • By 2007, continental real GDP growth above 5% for a fourth year and a larger inward-fdi stock still left most 2006 flows in South Africa, Nigeria, Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia, without a higher regional share of global FDI.
  • Listed-wrappers under Africa or Middle East and Africa labels showed country-concentration in South Africa, Egypt, Morocco, and Nigeria, even when the name list ran to hundreds of stocks.
  • Sector-stacks were heavy in financials or banks, then telecommunications, materials or basic resources, and oil and gas, so industry-rotation inside the label mattered as much as the continent name.
  • South Africa sat outside the frontier-market bucket with the continent's largest exchange, while the cited venues were still described as a small listed universe with thin liquidity and high-volatility risk.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Growth and the inward-fdi map

By 2007, continental real GDP growth was reported above 5% for a fourth straight year. The same setting included a positive fiscal balance, more inflation-targeting central banks, and still-high poverty.

Inward-fdi rose from 2.4 billion dollars in 1985 to 36 billion dollars in 2006 and then held at that level in 2007. That rise did not lift the region's share of global FDI.

In 2006, five hosts absorbed most regional inward-fdi: South Africa 24%, Nigeria 13%, Egypt 12%, Morocco 10%, and Tunisia 7%.

Commodity prices as an incomplete driver

Commodity prices were treated as a major but incomplete growth driver. Higher metal and soft-commodity receipts were offset by costlier food and energy imports. Inward-fdi clustered in natural resources and services rather than manufacturing.

Venues, liquidity, and the frontier-market split

Venues cited for a regional-sleeve included South Africa, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Namibia, Botswana, Nigeria, and Kenya. South Africa's exchange, founded in 1887, was described as the continent's largest, with developed equity and derivatives markets.

South Africa was treated as outside the frontier-market bucket, with dedicated local listed-wrappers available. The cited markets were characterized as sharing a small listed universe, thin liquidity, and high-volatility risk.

Country-concentration in listed-wrappers

One Middle East and Africa index product held 341 names at year-end 2007. On 10 July 2008 it allocated 52.82% to South Africa, 8.91% to Morocco, 6.78% to Egypt, and 1.42% to Nigeria.

A fifty-name Africa index launched in July 2008 required more than 200 million dollars of capitalization. The related listed-wrapper's 9 July mix was Nigeria 25%, South Africa 24.7%, Egypt 13.1%, and Morocco 11.4%.

A July 2008 Middle East and North Africa wrapper placed 20.6% in Egypt and 13.32% in Morocco. A September 2008 Middle East and Africa fund showed African weights of Egypt 16.4%, South Africa 9.8%, and Nigeria 0.9%.

Sector-stack behind the geography label

The July 2008 Middle East and North Africa wrapper placed financials at 55.1%, telecommunications 19.05%, industrials 12.48%, and materials 10.36%.

The fifty-name Africa listed-wrapper mixed banks 33.7%, basic resources 18.2%, oil and gas 13.5%, telecommunications 10.2%, and technology 7.3%. The September 2008 Middle East and Africa fund held financials at 57.7%.

Host-country weights in 2008 Africa-labeled listed wrappers

A trader buying an Africa or Middle East and Africa wrapper in 2008 was still concentrated in a few hosts. The dedicated Africa ETF split its two largest country weights almost evenly between Nigeria and South Africa, the Middle East and Africa SPDR was more than half South African, and the T. Rowe Price fund’s named African stakes were a thin slice led by Egypt. The bars use the country percentages the article states for those funds on the July and September 2008 snapshot dates.
A trader buying an Africa or Middle East and Africa wrapper in 2008 was still concentrated in a few hosts. The dedicated Africa ETF split its two largest country weights almost evenly between Nigeria and South Africa, the Middle East and Africa SPDR was more than half South African, and the T. Rowe Price fund’s named African stakes were a thin slice led by Egypt. The bars use the country percentages the article states for those funds on the July and September 2008 snapshot dates.AFK, GAF, TRAMX · July–September 2008 · 2008-07-09T00:00:00.000Z to 2008-09-08T00:00:00.000Z

Each series is a single-date snapshot (AFK 9 July 2008, GAF 10 July 2008, TRAMX 8 September 2008). Only African hosts the source named are shown; remaining weights sat in other countries, including Middle East names in GAF and TRAMX.

How the construction audit sizes the sleeve

Editorial reading: asset-allocation sets how large the regional-sleeve may be only after liquidity, country-concentration, and the rest of the book are known. Diversification holds if the sleeve's drivers and constraints differ from the core book, not because the geography label is new.

Editorial reading: industry-rotation among banks, resources, energy, telecoms, and other groups is the mix decision when the regional weights or the commodity regime change. If the residual after the large hosts and the bank-and-resource sector-stack is small, the sleeve restates those same exposures rather than adding a distinct growth-and-liquidity regime.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
13 of 23 in the Industry rotation track
201157-59 pp.Next on Industry rotationTrend permission, priced entries, and sector rotationTrend permission came from a home-panel read of major US equity indexes, the 10-year Treasury, and the US dollar on short- and long-term horizons, and it allowed, reversed, or withheld new trades.
All readings on this track · 23 readings
  1. 1985Industry leadership carryover as a bull-regime test
  2. 1988Constructing industry-group breadth and rotation measures
  3. 1992Trendline holds, trailing stops, and industry rotation
  4. 1994Inflation-deflation regimes inside the stock cycle
  5. 1996Sector rotation across economic cycle phases
  6. 2001Rebased relative performance charts for sector rotation
  7. 2001Place a small-cap growth idea inside a regime map
  8. 2004Rebuild every industry as a share of one rank scoreboard
  9. 2004Rate-hike regimes and sector rotation as a case study
  10. 2005A two-name style-index sleeve makes rank rotation one procedure
  11. 2006Consumer staples after a smokestack cycle
  12. 2007An intra-sector regime split between builders and equity REITs
  13. 2008Country and sector weights in an Africa regional-sleeve
  14. 2011Trend permission, priced entries, and sector rotation
  15. 2012Construct a regime-aware context from sector rotation
  16. 2012Regime overlays versus rank rotation
  17. 2014Rank-based sector rotation as a portfolio test
  18. 2017Real estate as a ranked industry sleeve
  19. 2017Theme sleeves: liquidity and commission filters before industry rotation
  20. 2018Retail sleeve construction through channel rotation and daily leverage
  21. 2020Water sleeve construction: satellite size, industry mix, and liquidity
  22. 2020A ranked research terminal as a three-layer watchlist procedure
  23. 2020Regression channels for sector rotation context
All 29 readings tagged Industry rotation
Also on Industry rotation5 readings