Skip to main content
Track Fixed contract sizing
4 / 21
Library

1996issue C051-14

Variable position size after entry

This archive article keeps a channel-breakout-system's entry and exit prices fixed, then compares constant-position-size with a variable-position-size path that may add or reduce units only after a favorable move.

  • Entry and exit prices stay the same under constant-position-size and variable-position-size; only the number of contracts held during the trade may differ.
  • A unit is a volatility-scaled parcel of contracts, so markets with different multipliers and ranges can be given comparable exposure.
  • The vps-profile may change units only when standardized-price makes a new favorable high; size is frozen during retracements.
  • Risk is a Monte Carlo estimate of a rare downside loss before a profit goal, so a return-risk-ratio can compare sizing paths without also penalizing upside equity jumps.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A second rule set after entry

This archive article compares two post-entry sizing philosophies. One path reduces size after a favorable move. The other adds size after a favorable move. The question is which path is better on a risk-adjusted basis.

variable-position-size changes how many units are held after entry, while keeping the same entry and exit prices as a constant-position-size version of the system. constant-position-size holds the same number of units from entry to exit. Only the number of contracts held during the trade is allowed to differ.

The channel-breakout-system

The test vehicle is a channel-breakout-system, an always-or-flat breakout procedure that enters on a longer lookback extreme and exits on a shorter opposite extreme. Here that is a two-lookback channel breakout that enters on a 50-day extreme, exits on a 20-day opposite extreme, and stays flat until the next entry.

Units, not raw contracts

Constant-size exposure is defined in units, not raw contracts. A unit is a volatility-scaled parcel of contracts chosen so that markets with different multipliers and ranges receive comparable exposure. Contracts equal a trader-chosen constant divided by the product of the contract multiplier and the 20-day average true range at entry.

The baseline is one unit per market, with the sizing constant set to 1500, across a 25-market US futures book and two five-year windows, 1985-89 and 1990-94.

Standardized-price and the vps-profile

Variable size is applied on a standardized-price scale. standardized-price is price progress from entry, measured in units of the entry-time 20-day average true range, and signed so that favorable movement is positive. That quantity is favorable distance from entry divided by the entry-time 20-day average true range.

The vps-profile maps standardized-price highs to the number of units held. Units may change only when standardized-price makes a new favorable high. Size is frozen during retracements so the size path stays tractable. umax is the largest number of units the variable-size path is allowed to hold on one trade.

A worked size path starts at one unit, adds at standardized-price highs of 1 and 3, and later reduces size at still-higher standardized-price levels.

Risk as a rare downside loss

Risk is defined as a Monte Carlo estimate of a rare downside loss before a profit goal, not as a volatility statistic that also penalizes upside equity jumps. A return-risk-ratio, annual profit divided by a downside-loss amount estimated from the trade stream, is used to compare sizing methods.

A later walk-forward illustration

A later real-world walk-forward illustration compares the same breakout entries under variable and constant sizing. It reports a higher annualized return and a slightly smaller maximum open-equity drawdown for the variable path in 1990-94.

Editorial note: those archive-period figures are not a claim about present-day results.

Units versus standardized price after entry

Once the channel-breakout trade is on, size stays at one unit until standardized price S makes a new high of 1, rises to three units at a new high of 3, then scales out to two, one and zero units at S = 4, 5 and 7. Those unit counts are the article’s six stated rules, which match the labeled profile, so a trader sees that adds and cuts fire only after a favorable move.
Once the channel-breakout trade is on, size stays at one unit until standardized price S makes a new high of 1, rises to three units at a new high of 3, then scales out to two, one and zero units at S = 4, 5 and 7. Those unit counts are the article’s six stated rules, which match the labeled profile, so a trader sees that adds and cuts fire only after a favorable move.

The unit count may change only when S makes a new favorable extreme; retracements leave size unchanged. This teaching profile caps U at 3 and changes size only at integer S.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
4 of 21 in the Fixed contract sizing track
19961-8 pp.Next on Fixed contract sizingEquity path filters for contract size and drawdownExposure is bounded before the next trade because one later loss can cancel a streak of winning days and leave the account flat.
All readings on this track · 21 readings
  1. 1987Volatility-layered mechanical system with fixed contracts
  2. 1994Starting capital from worst-case portfolio walk-forwards
  3. 1994Bound small-account risk before adding leverage
  4. 1996Variable position size after entry
  5. 1996Equity path filters for contract size and drawdown
  6. 1997Stop distance, equity caps, and trading halts
  7. 1999Size-matched buy-and-hold evaluation for stock systems
  8. 2002Size from stop distance to keep dollar risk even
  9. 2003Share size from daily profit equilibrium
  10. 2004Half-size energy futures as a pre-trade leverage filter
  11. 2007Equalizing contract risk in trend following
  12. 2007Expected-equity sizing and geometric drag
  13. 2007Predefine the loss before fixed contract sizing
  14. 2013Weekday, session, and market expectancy for contract size
  15. 2014Bounded leverage before you size a trade
  16. 2015Equal-dollar futures size and open-interest liquidity
  17. 2015Atomize trading decisions: discipline over complexity
  18. 2017Tiny bets, ruin risk, and mechanical scale
  19. 2018Near-strike weekly puts and unfunded assignment risk
  20. 2019Paper trading is unfinished without fill and size rules
  21. 2019Constructing futures leverage from margin and fixed size
All 34 readings tagged Fixed contract sizing
Also on Fixed contract sizing5 readings