Skip to main content
Track Fundamental overlay
15 / 21
Library

2012issue C0358-61

Inactivity as a feature: a small-cap earnings overlay with a monthly average and weekly MACD

The archive stacks a 48-month moving-average regime, an unoptimized weekly MACD trigger, and a small-cap earnings overlay so a name has to clear several slow gates before it can be held. A TradersWeek editorial reading treats the idle time as the design, a hunt for rare long-hold winners instead of a reason to add more signals.

  • A 48-month moving average is the long-horizon technical layer and keeps exposure on only while price remains on the correct side of that lagged baseline.
  • A default weekly MACD rule is long-only: it buys when the oscillator rises above zero and sells when the oscillator turns negative.
  • The fundamental overlay first requires a market-capitalization cutoff below 300 million dollars and positive earnings for at least four years.
  • The stacked design is described as remaining invested only about one-third of the time, a quieter hunt for rare multi-bagger candidates rather than a fuller set of signals.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Three gates instead of more signals

The archive builds a long-hold workflow by stacking three gates rather than by adding extra signals. A multi-year moving-average regime, an unoptimized weekly MACD trigger, and a small-cap earnings overlay all have to agree before a name is held.

The moving average is a lagged trend baseline over a fixed lookback. MACD is a momentum oscillator that converts a price series into a signed long-only signal. The fundamental overlay is a universe and regime filter that requires durable reported earnings, a usable valuation multiple, and a small-capitalization constraint before any technical signal is allowed to fire.

One illustrated multi-year winner remained above a 48-month moving average for most of a decade while earnings compounded alongside price. A second illustrated winner is shown with the same sustained joint uptrend in price and earnings, not a price trend alone.

Earnings growth is treated as necessary but not sufficient. One long-term compounder posted earnings growth well above its 10-year price path.

Relative strength is a comparative ranking of a name versus the market or peers. It is described as rising in the stronger price examples and remaining flat where 10-year price progress stayed near or below the market average. Rising relative strength is treated as confirmation that a candidate is behaving like a winner rather than a market-average name.

The three examples are assigned average price-to-earnings levels of about 24, 16, and 19. The existence of earnings is treated as more important than the exact multiple.

The small-cap earnings screen

A stated candidate screen uses a market-capitalization cutoff below 300 million dollars and requires positive earnings for at least four years. That earnings-persistence test is a quality screen: several consecutive years of positive earnings so unprofitable or fad names are removed before a long-hold technical rule is applied.

The names sit in a micro-cap universe, a size-constrained stock set described with a ceiling near one billion dollars, a median near 140 million dollars, and a still tighter hunt below 300 million dollars.

A 48-month regime and a weekly MACD trigger

A 48-month moving average is proposed as the long-horizon technical layer on that small-cap universe. It keeps exposure only while price remains on the correct side of that line. A full-index implementation is described as needing a very large account because of the number of positions.

A weekly MACD long-only rule using default settings is specified as buying when the indicator rises above zero and selling when it turns negative. The unoptimized rule treats a rise through zero as an entry and a turn below zero as an exit, here on weekly bars.

A narrower hunt than the full index

The same earnings overlay can be stacked on that weekly MACD rule. The combined design is described as remaining invested only about one-third of the time.

Combining the technical layer with the fundamental overlay is presented as the preferred hunt for rare multi-bagger candidates when a full small-cap index is too large to trade name by name.

A TradersWeek editorial reading is that the unused share of the calendar should stay unused. The design already has a regime filter, a trigger, and an earnings overlay, and more signals would work against the hunt for rare long-hold winners.

Deckers Outdoor price, 48-month average, and earnings, 2000–2011

After the 2003 lift-off, split-adjusted DECK holds above its 48-month average for most of the next eight years, with only a short late-2008 break, while earnings rise from about eight cents to more than four dollars. Quarterly readings were taken from the monthly SRC plot (price bars, dotted average, quarterly earnings line). The same chart prints 10-year annualized growth of 55.9 percent in price and 43.8 percent in earnings.
After the 2003 lift-off, split-adjusted DECK holds above its 48-month average for most of the next eight years, with only a short late-2008 break, while earnings rise from about eight cents to more than four dollars. Quarterly readings were taken from the monthly SRC plot (price bars, dotted average, quarterly earnings line). The same chart prints 10-year annualized growth of 55.9 percent in price and 43.8 percent in earnings.DECK · Monthly bars, 2000–2011 · 2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2011-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Prices and earnings are already adjusted for the 3-for-1 split of 6 July 2010. The source uses a semi-log grid with price on the right axis and earnings on the left; both are restated here in dollars per share. Volume and the relative-strength line were not digitized. SRC 10-year growth rates are fitted trend rates, not point-to-point CAGRs.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
15 of 21 in the Fundamental overlay track
201514-17 pp.Next on Fundamental overlayEvaluating a capitalization-to-output-ratio as a regime overlayA 2015 evaluation charts the quarterly capitalization-to-output-ratio from 1957 through 2013 as a slow fundamental overlay on valuation, not as a decisive technical timing system.
All readings on this track · 21 readings
  1. 1991Growth earnings and price-to-earnings as a market-regime overlay
  2. 1991Earnings-price reliability as a first gate for growth-sleeve construction
  3. 1991Growth-adjusted earnings years as construction filters
  4. 1992Constructing an index nominal from smoothed earnings and effective rates
  5. 1992Real bond yields as a deficit-share regime
  6. 1994Relative valuation as regime context for fund allocation
  7. 1995A flattening trendline as a critique of the fundamental overlay
  8. 1998An earnings-to-price mapping is unfinished until add, reduce, and stand-aside are rules
  9. 1999Regime-aware stock exposure when rates and market condition agree
  10. 2002Short-rate velocity regimes before tightening
  11. 2003A pre-trade checklist that requires rule and fundamental agreement
  12. 2004Evaluating P/E overlays with matched crossovers
  13. 2004Constructing a stock-versus-bond regime from earnings yields
  14. 2012Cash-rich relative strength as a pre-trade portfolio filter
  15. 2012Inactivity as a feature: a small-cap earnings overlay with a monthly average and weekly MACD
  16. 2015Evaluating a capitalization-to-output-ratio as a regime overlay
  17. 2016Risk-adjusted earnings yield as a portfolio overlay
  18. 2017Oil, yields, and implied volatility as a regime critique
  19. 2017When a one-year bull sits inside a secular bear
  20. 2018A critique of rules-only trading systems
  21. 2019When seasonal and policy regimes override crowd mood
All 33 readings tagged Fundamental overlay
Also on Fundamental overlay5 readings