20251-44
R-multiples before you size up
A dollar equity curve after a size increase overweights later, larger trades. R-multiples and expected value keep strategy health independent of dollar size, and a written size-up plan waits for a stated profit level over a minimum time.
- A dollar equity curve after a size increase overweights later, larger trades and can hide whether earlier, smaller trades were still healthy.
- R-multiples and expectancy measure strategy health independently of the dollar size used on each trade.
- Recording R-multiples from the first trades, before any size-up, keeps later sizing decisions from rewriting the performance record.
- Raising size all at once is described as the most common sizing error. A written plan can require a prescribed increase only after a stated profit level over a minimum time, instead of after a single strong day.
Dollar curves after a size increase
A dollar equity curve after a size increase overweights later, larger trades and can hide whether earlier, smaller trades were still healthy. R-multiples and expectancy measure strategy health independently of the dollar size used on each trade.
R-multiples keep the record honest
An R-multiple is a trade result divided by the planned risk on that trade, so small and large sizes can be compared on the same scale. Expected value is the average outcome per unit of risk, used as a sizing-independent filter of whether a strategy still pays for the risk it takes. Recording R-multiples from the first trades, before any size-up, keeps later sizing decisions from rewriting the performance record.
Bound the loss before you raise size
Volatility position sizing is a pre-entry rule that sets trade size from account equity, current volatility, stop distance and allowed exposure so a single loss stays inside a planned bound.
TradersWeek editorial: that bound is the first risk decision. A later size-up is a separate decision, judged by whether expected value in R still pays for the risk taken.
Write the size-up plan
Raising size all at once is described as the most common sizing error. A planned increase over days or weeks is the alternative offered. A written size-up plan can require a prescribed increase only after a stated profit level over a minimum time, instead of after a single strong day. A size-up milestone is a prewritten profit, time and drawdown test that must be met before risk per trade is increased.
All readings on this track · 25 readings
- 1988Two-sided optimization for volatility-scaled breakout rules
- 1990Weekly range volatility as a tactical regime filter
- 1993Heat first, then contract count on a weekly close-only breakout
- 1994Shared sigma for trend entries, retests and stops
- 1995The promised result as one testable trading procedure
- 2001Convert a survival ceiling into a volatility filter
- 2002Bound the next loss before the bear trade
- 2004Dollar-loss tolerance versus percent-of-equity stops
- 2004Bounded risk before entry: stop, size, and leverage
- 2006Position sizing as the pre-trade bound on loss and exposure
- 2006A trend-regime matrix for volatility position sizing
- 2011A premarket range checklist for opening-hour breakouts
- 2011Stop-defined share count on a clustered intraday short
- 2012Mechanical system design with strategy, signals, and size
- 2012Precommit size before a one-day policy shock
- 2013R-multiple expectancy, drawdown, and volatility position sizing
- 2014Constructing trend-aware slope-divergence rules
- 2014Pretrade drawdown fences and volatility sizing
- 2015Convert pip value into cash before a forex lot size is chosen
- 2016Expectancy as an execution skill rather than a backtest score
- 2017Volatility parity equalizes the ticket; implied volatility is a regime dial
- 2018Wide-range breakout rules from chart volatility
- 2019A structure-based stop, then resize or pass
- 2020A cash rule that zeros a trend book on extreme volatility and a short losing window
- 2025R-multiples before you size up