2004issue C081-5
Bounded risk before entry: stop, size, and leverage
Trade size is recalculated from account equity, stop distance, and costs so a planned stop-loss stays inside a chosen risk budget. Margin may fund a larger notional size only when that planned equity loss remains inside the same budget.
- Trade size is not a fixed share or contract count. It is recalculated from account equity, entry, stop distance, and costs so the planned loss stays inside a chosen risk budget.
- The 2% per trade risk rule sets risk amount as 2% of account equity, including commission and estimated slippage, and is independent of whether margin is used.
- A complementary sector rule allows up to 2% planned risk in one sector and up to 6% combined planned risk across open positions.
- Stops plus size control are presented as the way to keep a drawdown, meaning a run of consecutive losses, from exhausting the account.
Position size as a pre-entry filter
Trade size is not a fixed share or contract count. It is recalculated from changing account equity, entry, stop distance, and costs so the planned loss stays inside a chosen risk budget.
Because any single trade outcome is unknown at entry, the decision is whether the planned stop and size keep the loss affordable before the order is placed.
A stop-loss is a planned exit that bounds the loss if price reaches a chosen level. Volatility position sizing chooses the share or contract quantity from account equity, that stop distance, and costs so the planned loss stays inside the risk budget. Leverage control uses margin to fund a larger notional size only when the planned equity loss, including costs, still stays inside the same budget.
How trade size is set
Risk amount is the dollars that may be lost if the stop is hit, including commission and, when known, slippage.
A working size formula is risk amount minus commission, divided by the difference between entry and stop, yielding shares or contracts. That result is the trade size: the number of shares or contracts implied by dividing remaining risk dollars by the distance from entry to stop.
The 2% rules and leftover budget
The 2% per trade risk rule sets risk amount as 2% of account equity. That planned dollar loss must include commission and, when it can be estimated, slippage, and is independent of whether margin is used.
A complementary 2% per sector risk rule keeps combined planned loss in one market sector at or below 2% of account equity. Overall 6% risk is a working ceiling that keeps combined planned loss across open positions at or below 6% of account equity. Additional trades go into other sectors or commodities until those ceilings are reached.
Once a trailing stop locks in profit, residual risk on that position is no longer the original 2%, which can free budget for additional trades without raising the original loss allowance.
Two sizing illustrations
In the $25,000 account illustration, 2% risk is $500. With an $80 commission and a $1.50 entry-to-stop gap, the formula yields 280 shares.
In the $50,000 account illustration using 150% margin, a $91.49 entry, $90.23 stop, and $51.22 commission produce a 753-share size, $18,891.97 of margin use, and a $1,000 planned stop-out loss equal to 2% of equity. The planned equity loss, not the notional size funded by margin, is what must stay inside the risk amount.
Surviving a run of losses
Stops plus size control are presented as the way to keep a sequence of losses from exhausting the account, since even a tested method can lose several times in a row. Drawdown here means a run of consecutive losses that a tested method can produce and that risk limits are meant to survive.
All readings on this track · 25 readings
- 1988Two-sided optimization for volatility-scaled breakout rules
- 1990Weekly range volatility as a tactical regime filter
- 1993Heat first, then contract count on a weekly close-only breakout
- 1994Shared sigma for trend entries, retests and stops
- 1995The promised result as one testable trading procedure
- 2001Convert a survival ceiling into a volatility filter
- 2002Bound the next loss before the bear trade
- 2004Dollar-loss tolerance versus percent-of-equity stops
- 2004Bounded risk before entry: stop, size, and leverage
- 2006Position sizing as the pre-trade bound on loss and exposure
- 2006A trend-regime matrix for volatility position sizing
- 2011A premarket range checklist for opening-hour breakouts
- 2011Stop-defined share count on a clustered intraday short
- 2012Mechanical system design with strategy, signals, and size
- 2012Precommit size before a one-day policy shock
- 2013R-multiple expectancy, drawdown, and volatility position sizing
- 2014Constructing trend-aware slope-divergence rules
- 2014Pretrade drawdown fences and volatility sizing
- 2015Convert pip value into cash before a forex lot size is chosen
- 2016Expectancy as an execution skill rather than a backtest score
- 2017Volatility parity equalizes the ticket; implied volatility is a regime dial
- 2018Wide-range breakout rules from chart volatility
- 2019A structure-based stop, then resize or pass
- 2020A cash rule that zeros a trend book on extreme volatility and a short losing window
- 2025R-multiples before you size up