1989issue C031-6
Evaluate an always-in ATR breakout as one procedure
Restate the always-in breakout, the true-range stop distance, and the parameter sweep as one evaluation procedure before asking what an optimized number is doing.
- A fill at the precomputed target stays long or short until the opposite stop is hit, so the stance is always in a position and same-direction repeats do not start a new trade.
- The next session's long and short stops sit 0.75 times the five-session average true range from the prior close, which bounds how far price must travel before exposure begins.
- A packaged or rule-level tester may vary numeric inputs and emit a profit-and-loss report, but it does not rewrite the embedded long and short rules.
- TradersWeek editorial: treat those three pieces as one procedure before asking whether an optimized number is doing work the rule did not already specify.
Audit three pieces as one procedure
The archive workflow can be restated as three pieces that belong in one evaluation object: an always-in breakout, a true-range stop distance from the prior close, and a sweep of numeric inputs that does not rewrite the long and short rules.
TradersWeek editorial: complete that restatement before asking whether any optimized number is doing work the rule did not already specify.
Restate the always-in breakout
A breakout system in this archive sense is a complete long-or-short procedure. It enters when price reaches a precomputed target and stays in that direction until the opposite target is reached.
After a fill, the procedure stays long or short until the opposite stop is hit, so it is always in a position. An opposite-target fill both exits and reverses. That is the always-in stance.
Orders are meant to fill on an intraday stop at the precomputed target, not after the session close. Repeated same-direction signals while a trade is open do not start a new position. They only show that the reversal stop has not yet been reached.
The breakout construction is described as better suited to markets that change price rapidly than to quiet ones.
Restate the true-range stop distance
ATR position sizing, in this archive sense, uses a multi-session average true range to place the next session's long and short stops a volatility-scaled distance from the prior close. The exposure decision is bounded before a fill.
The next session's long stop is the prior close plus 0.75 times the five-session average range, and the short stop is the prior close minus that same distance. That 0.75 multiple is the target-factor: a fixed fraction of recent average true range used to locate both stops.
When a session gaps and never trades back through the prior close, that unused gap is included so the five-session average is an average true range rather than high minus low. True-range is the session range after any unfilled opening gap is added back to high minus low.
Setting both stops a true-range multiple from the prior close bounds how far price must travel before exposure begins.
Restate the parameter sweep
A packaged breakout offering typically lets the buyer vary numeric inputs and review optimized runs, but not rewrite the embedded long and short rules. System optimization, in this archive sense, is that sweep of numeric inputs on a fixed rule set. It produces alternative test reports without rewriting entry, exit, or reversal logic.
A rule-level tester can encode the same entry, reversal, and range inputs, then optimize those inputs and emit a profit-and-loss report as one evaluation object.
All readings on this track · 36 readings
- 1988Constructing unsigned true range for directional models
- 1989Evaluate an always-in ATR breakout as one procedure
- 1992Variable lookback and average true range as a trend-filter construction
- 1993A random-walk index that uses true range as its scale
- 1993A shared harness for trend-filter construction
- 1998Finish a trend with a volatility trail, wave permission, and a slower-frame veto
- 1999A trend filter that switches tactics and scales ATR targets
- 2001Filter higher lows with linear regression, then judge the exit
- 2003A Mechanical trading system is a maintained procedure, not only an entry trigger
- 2005Construction of a volatility-bounded long entry
- 2005Six-zone encoding of open, high, low, and close
- 2006Normalized average true range as a pre-entry volatility bound
- 2006Chandelier exits, ATR position sizing, and trailing stops
- 2007Constructing a rule-based entry with Relative Strength Index and ATR position sizing
- 2008Constructing a zero-lag TMA and heikin-ashi crossover as a complete rule set
- 2010Use the session-range percent stop as a pre-trade filter
- 2011OCA exit groups, trailing limits, and ATR stops
- 2011ATR bands around support and resistance for stops and targets
- 2013Algorithmic head-and-shoulders construction with bounded exits
- 2013Constructing ATR-scaled swing pivots and linear-regression divergence
- 2013Constructing volatility bands from typical price
- 2014Constructing true-range contraction filters before expansion
- 2015Constructing touch plans from modified true range
- 2015One checklist for breakout entry and ATR risk
- 2015Percentage true-range construction for cross-market volatility filters
- 2015Construct a percentage true range for cross-market volatility
- 2015Percentage true range as a pre-entry exposure filter
- 2016Constructing ATR-filtered breakout entries
- 2017A dividend date as a pairs-trading classroom
- 2018Range-based volatility as a true-range construction
- 2018Moving average support and volatility-band construction
- 2018Construct a lifecycle breakout from compression
- 2018Pair the book first and let volatility or range set the size
- 2019Trend systems need a no-trade rule
- 2020Average true range as a shared unit for size, pairs, and stops
- 2020Volatility sizing and target-risk leverage as a pre-trade gate