Skip to main content
Track Elliott wave analysis
20 / 26
Library

2014issue C0331

Elliott-wave target versus the option bid-ask

A historical case treated a 65 wave-4-hold on CND as support for a 68.55 objective, then asked whether that remaining impulse still existed after the April 60 call’s 1.60 quoted-spread.

  • A wave-4-hold can keep a cash-chart impulse intact while the quoted-spread on the listed option consumes the wave-remainder.
  • The April 60 in-the-money-call implied 670 of defined cost per contract, a theoretical 1.85-point gain at 68.55, and a 1.60 quoted-spread.
  • A limit-fill-rule and an exercise-to-cash exit were the stated controls, with hard fills near expiration and possible overnight share exposure.
  • A penny-quoted-class narrows the increment on designated liquid series; ordinary and multi-leg books can still erase most of an unfinished wave.
Entries in this reading1 entry

The wave-4-hold and the remaining impulse

The case applied Elliott-wave structure to CND near 66. It treated a recent 65 low as a wave-4-hold, a prior corrective low used as support after Wave 4 so the remaining upside-impulse hypothesis stayed intact. The next upside objective was 68.55. The wave-remainder is the distance from the current price to that wave-derived objective.

Expressing the target in an in-the-money-call

The shortest listed expiration that still matched that wave horizon was 96 days away. The April 60 call was the contract priced against the target. It was used as an in-the-money-call because it carried less time value and was expected to track the underlying more like shares. A 6.70 debit on that April 60 call implied 670 of defined cost and risk per contract.

The quoted-spread against the wave-remainder

At an underlying price of 68.55, the same calls were marked at a theoretical 8.55, a 1.85-point gain, against a 1.60 quoted-spread. The case framed that 1.60 gap as large enough to erase most or all of the remaining wave distance, especially on illiquid series and multi-leg spreads. The wave-remainder is the quantity a quoted option spread can consume.

Stated controls on entry and exit

One stated control was a limit-fill-rule: enter and exit with limits so the wave trade does not pay the full quoted gap. Limits can be hard to fill near expiration. Another stated control was exercise-to-cash, converting the option into stock and exiting in the shares market to bypass a wide options book. That path notes overnight exposure unless the shares were shorted first, and only if the name could be shorted.

Smaller increments on a penny-quoted-class

A 2007 exchange pilot quoted designated liquid classes in 0.01 increments below a 3 premium and 0.05 at or above 3, with one index product quoted in 0.01 across all series. A penny-quoted-class is that designated liquid options class, quoted in smaller increments so the minimum spread is tighter than on ordinary series.

Church & Dwight call bid and ask by strike

The April 60 call used to express the 68.55 fifth-wave objective is offered at 6.70, and every April ask on this board sits well above its bid. That listed gap is the liquidity tax the column sets against the remaining impulse. Values are the bid and ask prints from the source call table.
The April 60 call used to express the 68.55 fifth-wave objective is offered at 6.70, and every April ask on this board sits well above its bid. That listed gap is the liquidity tax the column sets against the remaining impulse. Values are the bid and ask prints from the source call table.Church & Dwight (CND) · April 2014 (96 DTE) and July 2014 (187 DTE) expirations

The April 60 bid printed as a dash on the quote board and is omitted; the column text states a $1.60 spread on that contract. Mid-implied-volatility percentages shown under each market are not plotted.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
20 of 26 in the Elliott wave analysis track
201443-45 pp.Next on Elliott wave analysisA three-layer classroom on one daily futures chartThe worksheet plotted a 10-day simple moving average through a daily equity-index futures series as the only illustrated study.
All readings on this track · 26 readings
  1. 1984Three-gate confirmation for wave, ratio, and cycle turns
  2. 1988Triaging Elliott wave counts with weekly stochastic divergences
  3. 1989Dominant-cycle phase flips as regime tests
  4. 1989Audit signals against elasticity regimes
  5. 1990When wave counts fail the exclusion test
  6. 1991Evaluating hourly DJIA growth-rate and velocity attractors
  7. 1996If a terminal fifth is rewritten, fail the first count
  8. 1998Mapping industrial-average swings with Fibonacci growth and retracements
  9. 1999Define the stop before the wave or the divergence
  10. 2001Form-first Elliott wave construction with phi
  11. 2006Wave count, channel floor, and Fibonacci bands after a correction
  12. 2007Impulse and correction as a recursive fractal recipe
  13. 2008Gold-silver ratio as a shoreline wave
  14. 2008A daily chart trend filter with Elliott wave abstention
  15. 2010Revising Elliott wave counts with RSI and stochastic guides
  16. 2010Constructing corrective-wave hypotheses with Fibonacci retracements
  17. 2011Pre-commit the wave-and-ratio stop before entry
  18. 2012Dated wave and ratio cases need a later-sample test
  19. 2013Keep a 1-2-3 count only while zigzag, Fibonacci depth, and divergence still agree
  20. 2014Elliott-wave target versus the option bid-ask
  21. 2014A three-layer classroom on one daily futures chart
  22. 2015Elliott wave classifies the swing; trend following holds the trade
  23. 2016Constructing wave labels and retracement zones from chart structure
  24. 2017Sector ETF pairs in quiet regimes
  25. 2017A policy-shift case that tested a delayed long-cycle wave count
  26. 2018One role each for wave, Fibonacci, and stochastic
All 94 readings tagged Elliott wave analysis
Also on Elliott wave analysis5 readings