Skip to main content
Track Open interest analysis
14 / 20
Library

2015issue C127

Money-flow lookback versus aggregated open interest

The money-flow oscillator in the correspondence uses a default lookback of 20 periods that may be changed to match a trading style, and it is described as usable on daily, weekly, and monthly charts. A TradersWeek editorial reading places that lookback after checks for a choppy-market rule and for whether volume and open interest describe one instrument or only a market-wide total.

  • A published lookback of 20 periods is a starting choice that may be changed to match a trading style, and the same oscillator is described as usable on daily, weekly, and monthly charts.
  • The oscillator is described as not producing valid signals when the market is choppy, so a trend filter is meant to stay silent in that regime rather than be repaired by the lookback alone.
  • The designer states the oscillator can be applied to indexes, stocks, and exchange-traded funds, including commodity and currency funds, and does not work on futures contracts because those charts normally show only total volume and open-interest figures.
  • Reader questions about a longer lookback, short-period smoothing, or a multi-period overlay do not replace the prior check that volume and open interest still belong to the contract being read.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Lookback as one parameter

The money-flow oscillator in the correspondence uses a default lookback of 20 periods that may be changed to match a trading style. Volume-price analysis here means combining price structure with volume so a money-flow reading can be treated as a falsifiable condition rather than a free-standing forecast.

A TradersWeek editorial reading treats the lookback period as one slot in a larger parameter stack: chart scale, market regime, and whether volume and open interest describe a single instrument or only a market-wide total. The lookback is not, on that reading, a substitute for those earlier inputs.

Chart scale and the choppy-market rule

The same oscillator is described as usable on daily, weekly, and monthly charts. Chart scale is therefore a separate choice from the number of bars in the lookback.

The oscillator is described as not producing valid signals when the market is choppy. A trend filter is a quantitative gate that is meant to stay silent or invalid when price action is choppy and to be compared across an explicit lookback and sampling interval.

A reader asked whether lengthening the lookback, or applying short-period smoothing, could reduce choppiness enough for intraday use. The archive records that question. It does not show that a longer lookback or added smoothing restores a valid reading in a choppy market.

Instrument coverage and aggregated totals

The designer states the oscillator can be applied to indexes, stocks, and exchange-traded funds, including commodity and currency funds. The designer states the oscillator does not work on futures contracts.

The stated reason for the futures limitation is that those charts normally show only total volume and open-interest figures. That display is aggregated open interest: combined volume and open-interest totals instead of the figures that belong to one contract.

Open-interest analysis, in this archive sense, means reading how the open-interest and volume series are built, contract-level versus market-wide totals, before trusting a flow oscillator on that instrument.

Overlays and when to retune

A reader asked whether overlaying several instances with different periods and treating their crosses as a signal would be valid. That proposal is a multi-period overlay: stacking several instances of the same oscillator with different lookbacks and asking whether their crosses can count as a separate signal. The archive records the question and does not settle it.

TradersWeek editorial view: retune the lookback only after chart scale, the choppy-market rule, and the volume and open-interest series still match the contract being read. A multi-period overlay is a separate signal hypothesis, not a way around aggregated totals or a silent trend filter.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
14 of 20 in the Open interest analysis track
201656-56 pp.Next on Open interest analysisRanking futures by executable liquidity and open interestA futures liquidity ranking scores how easily a public contract can be bought or sold relative to other listed markets.
All readings on this track · 20 readings
  1. 1988Wave-count consensus and open-interest confirmation
  2. 1990Calibrating volume and open interest at support and resistance
  3. 1997Grading volume and open interest after moving-average crosses
  4. 2003Constructing an expiration settlement map from listed open interest
  5. 2010Futures liquidity filter for equal-dollar size and open interest
  6. 2010Screen futures for tradeable liquidity before sizing
  7. 2011Screen futures liquidity with open interest and equal dollar size
  8. 2011Construct a daily initiator filter from lead-contract price, open interest, and volume
  9. 2012Ranking futures markets by executable liquidity
  10. 2013Equal-dollar open interest as a futures liquidity filter
  11. 2013Filter futures by open interest and relative liquidity
  12. 2015Filter futures contracts by open interest and volume
  13. 2015Screen listed futures for executable liquidity first
  14. 2015Money-flow lookback versus aggregated open interest
  15. 2016Ranking futures by executable liquidity and open interest
  16. 2018Futures liquidity and open interest as an execution filter
  17. 2019Evaluate futures liquidity with open interest and equal-dollar filters
  18. 2019Screen futures contracts by open interest and liquidity
  19. 2020Filter futures orders by liquidity and open interest
  20. 2020Ranking futures liquidity before you place the order
All 118 readings tagged Open interest analysis
Also on Open interest analysis5 readings