Skip to main content
Track Historical analog comparison
4 / 19
Library

1991issue C111-4

Evaluating quarterly return runs with historical analogs

A runs-test scores a live signed quarterly-return sequence by run-extent and run-duration. Historical-analog-comparison then ranks that run against completed same-sign historical runs.

  • Signed quarterly total-return sequences can be partitioned into same-sign runs and scored by run-extent and run-duration.
  • A runs-test counts consecutive same-sign quarterly total-return observations until an opposite-sign quarter interrupts the up-move or down-move.
  • Historical-analog-comparison places a live signed-return run beside completed historical runs of the same sign and ranks them by cumulative extent and duration.
  • In the evaluation record, many up-moves exceeded a 25 percent run-extent, while down-moves rarely did so without an interrupting quarter and rarely lasted more than two or three quarters.
Entries in this reading2 entries

Scoring signed quarterly runs

Signed quarterly total-return sequences can be partitioned into same-sign runs and scored both by percentage extent and by duration in quarters. Run-extent is the cumulative percentage total return accumulated across one uninterrupted signed run. Run-duration is the number of consecutive quarters that keep the same return sign.

A runs-test is a count of consecutive same-sign quarterly total-return observations used to measure how long an advance or decline persists before an opposite-sign quarter interrupts it. An up-move is a run of consecutive quarters with positive total return. A down-move is a run of consecutive quarters with negative total return.

What the completed runs showed

The evaluation sample is quarterly average total returns on a capitalization-weighted industrial equity index from 1940 through the second quarter of 1991.

In that record, many positive quarterly runs exceeded a 25 percent cumulative total return, while very few negative quarterly runs exceeded 25 percent without an interrupting quarter. Negative quarterly runs rarely lasted more than two or three consecutive quarters, whereas positive quarterly runs were less regular in length and more often continued longer.

The negative-run group placed above 25 percent contained two tabulated extents: 32.6 percent and 33.5 percent. Positive-run durations grouped as longer than four quarters included lengths of 5, 7, 7, 10, 6, 5, 11, 5, and 5 quarters. Negative-run durations grouped as longer than four quarters included two sequences of 6 quarters each.

Ranking a live up-move

Historical-analog-comparison is a side-by-side placement of a live signed-return run against completed historical runs of the same sign, ranked by cumulative extent and duration.

A then-current positive run of three consecutive quarters and a 25 percent gain was compared with 41 completed positive runs, of which 14 later posted larger cumulative gains and 15 later posted longer durations.

Up-move extent by size class, S&P 500 Industrials

Quarterly up-runs cluster at the extremes: many stay under 10 percent, but fourteen of forty-one finished above 25 percent, matching the live 25 percent three-quarter gain. Frequencies are the class counts printed in the figure inset, for capitalization-weighted S&P 500 Industrials from 1940 through second-quarter 1991.
Quarterly up-runs cluster at the extremes: many stay under 10 percent, but fourteen of forty-one finished above 25 percent, matching the live 25 percent three-quarter gain. Frequencies are the class counts printed in the figure inset, for capitalization-weighted S&P 500 Industrials from 1940 through second-quarter 1991.S&P 500 Industrials (capitalization-weighted, quarterly average total return) · quarterly · 1940-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 1991-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

The greater-than-25-percent bin is an open tail; the source lists the fourteen constituent runs as 41.3, 40.2, 45.4, 74.4, 36.7, 28.0, 45.7, 28.9, 35.2, 25.3, 44.5, 30.3, 30.6 and 27.4 percent.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
4 of 19 in the Historical analog comparison track
19921-6 pp.Next on Historical analog comparisonEvaluating split events across correction and bear regimesA stock-split halves the quoted price and the per-share earnings and dividends while doubling the share count, without increasing the issuer's financial strength.
All readings on this track · 19 readings
  1. 1988Crash fear fails the depression regime test
  2. 1990October 1987 cycle overlay and the loss-trap
  3. 1990Constructing nested four-year market cycles
  4. 1991Evaluating quarterly return runs with historical analogs
  5. 1992Evaluating split events across correction and bear regimes
  6. 1993Mining-bullion relative strength as a gold-sleeve regime
  7. 1994A two-horizon case study of a market-breadth oscillator
  8. 1994Extreme short-rate declines as equity regime context
  9. 1997Clustered true-range days as a regime label rather than a top forecast
  10. 2001Nearest-neighbor one-week forecast from log-price patterns
  11. 2001Constructing nearest-neighbor forecasts gated by a trend filter
  12. 2003Regime context for debt-era bear rallies
  13. 2004Testing a 1987 stock and gold analog by wave degree
  14. 2004Shifting calendar regimes and election-cycle analogs
  15. 2006Aligning sugar boom phases with seasonal analogs
  16. 2009Crowd consensus and failed targets as regime context
  17. 2011Treat a long-horizon chart analog as a regime scenario
  18. 2012Build a weekly analog as a dated forecast object
  19. 2015From a drawn price shape to an event-cloud case study
All 19 readings tagged Historical analog comparison
Also on Historical analog comparison5 readings