1988issue C051
Test edges against chance, not story
Use this archive note to build a two-step research habit. First ask whether a market behavior is distinguishable from chance. Then prefer a model whose output cannot travel opposite price, and keep a stop-loss simple enough to estimate without a catalog of combinations.
- The first research question is whether an observed behavior differs from random behavior with enough significance to treat as more than sampling noise.
- A moving average is a smoothed series built from ordered prices, so it cannot travel opposite the prevailing move the way an oscillator can.
- Price patterns remain statistically identified constructs with error and uneven significance, even when wrapped in rules or filters.
- Cataloguing every combination is rejected as unhelpful complexity. A stop-loss is treated as a simple behavior that can still be studied with a nonparametric distribution.
Description is not explanation
This editorial holds that market phenomena can be described while remaining unexplained. It also holds that small-group market simulations had not shown whether greed and fear have deeper roots.
The archive therefore keeps returning to a narrower question: whether an observed behavior differs significantly from random behavior. That discussion runs through correlation, dependency, chi-square testing, and significance levels.
Ask whether the behavior differs from chance
Price patterns, even when wrapped in trading rules or filters, are treated as statistically identified constructs that retain error and uneven significance.
The chance question is asked with several tools. Correlation is a measure of association used to ask whether two market series move together beyond what chance would suggest. Dependency describes whether successive price or indicator observations are related rather than independent. A chi-square test is a count-based check of whether observed market outcomes differ from the frequencies expected under a chance or independent model. Significance is a statistical judgment of whether a measured difference from chance is large enough to treat as more than sampling noise.
Prefer a model that cannot fight the tape
Moving averages are offered as indicators that cannot travel opposite prevailing price. A moving average is a smoothed series built from ordered prices, so its direction is constrained by those prices and cannot travel opposite the prevailing move.
An oscillator is a derived reading such as stochastics, momentum, or relative strength that can move contrary to price. Those readings routinely can travel opposite the prevailing move. Relative strength is singled out as being valued for preceding turning points rather than staying aligned with price. This editorial prefers the moving average on that alignment, not because an oscillator is unused, but because its output can fight the tape.
Keep the stop simple enough to estimate
Cataloguing every combination and computing occurrence probabilities is rejected as unhelpful complexity. Simple behaviors estimated with straightforward nonparametric distributions, illustrated by stop placement, are treated as still-open work.
A stop-loss is a precommitted exit that bounds a losing position before and during a trade, treated here as a simple behavior that can be studied with straightforward nonparametric distributions. A nonparametric distribution is a data-first description of simple trading behaviors from ranks or frequencies, without assuming a fully specified theoretical shape.
A magazine can only point
The editor reports a split audience for statistical writing, with some readers finding it tedious and others finding it not deep enough, and concludes the magazine can only point toward methods. Having treated instruction on how to use statistics as nearly exhausted, the editor plans to shift later issues toward practical examples.
All readings on this track · 17 readings
- 1987Testing price-volume agreement after percent reversal filters
- 1988Constructing chi-square tests for two-way price counts
- 1988Building consensus indicators with correlation and the chi-square test
- 1988Test edges against chance, not story
- 1988Constructing an advance-decline divergence oscillator
- 1989Evaluate a contrary put-call premium ratio at a stated horizon
- 1990A weekly resistance-index from hourly volume-per-point
- 1990Testing breadth above moving averages by horizon
- 1990Evaluating member versus odd-lot breadth
- 1990A chi-square test of split frequency histograms across price aggregations
- 1990Evaluating smoothed secondary counts with a chi-square test
- 1991Treat session high and low times as codes, then require a chi-square check
- 1991A signed hourly swing catalog as a next-session chi-square check
- 1992Constructing a chi-square test as a gate for two-way market records
- 1992Percent filters, log point-and-figure, and breadth residuals
- 1997Build a chi-square stationarity screen before you forecast
- 1998Timed breakout rules after a nested-bar contraction