Skip to main content
Track Index proxy comparison
13 / 19
Library

2010issue C0739

Matched straddles on levered versus unlevered index proxies

A week-to-month, dollar-matched options straddle placed a two-times S&P 500 proxy beside an unlevered index fund. After implied volatility, breakeven bands, and the Greeks were scaled to similar cash outlay, little residual gap remained.

  • Four May 41 straddles on the two-times S&P 500 proxy at 2.75 were treated as a near-dollar match for three May 116 straddles on the unlevered fund at 3.87.
  • Quoted implied volatility was 50.5 on the leveraged-proxy straddle versus 25.3 on the unlevered-fund straddle, a near doubling in line with the two-times daily design.
  • Leveraged-proxy breakeven bands implied about a 7 percent upside move and a 6.50 percent downside move, versus about 3.50 percent and 3.20 percent on the unlevered fund.
  • Editorial reading: once those quotes and Greeks are scaled to leverage and similar cash outlay, the extra punch is already in the price rather than a free overlay.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A dollar-matched comparison after the shock

A few sessions after an early-May index shock, an options straddle, a same-strike, same-expiry long call and put, was used to compare two index vehicles on similar dollar risk over weeks to months. The index-proxy pair was a two-times daily S&P 500 fund and an unlevered S&P 500 fund, each started from the at-the-money strike, the front-month strike nearest the close, so both packages began from comparable moneyness.

The two-times S&P 500 proxy closed at 40.86 against a May 41 strike. The unlevered S&P 500 fund closed at 115.83 against a May 116 strike.

Matched-dollar-risk sized each straddle so outlay was a similar share of a small book rather than matching share count or notional. On a hypothetical 50000 book risking just over 2 percent per line, four May 41 straddles on the leveraged proxy at 2.75, an 1100 outlay, were treated as a near-dollar match for three May 116 straddles on the unlevered fund at 3.87, a 1161 outlay. Under that construction the three unlevered straddles cost about 6 percent, or 60 dollars, more than the four leveraged straddles.

Implied volatility and the breakeven band

Implied volatility is the volatility already quoted in each straddle. Quoted implied volatility was 50.5 on the leveraged-proxy straddle versus 25.3 on the unlevered-fund straddle, a near doubling in line with the two-times daily design.

The breakeven-band is the underlying percentage move each straddle needs before expiry to recover the premium paid. Leveraged-proxy breakevens of 43.75 and 38.25 implied about a 7 percent upside move and a 6.50 percent downside move from 40.86. Unlevered-fund breakevens of 119.87 and 112.13 implied about a 3.50 percent move higher and a 3.20 percent move lower.

Greek scaling on similar cash outlay

Greek-scaling asks how delta, gamma, theta, and vega of a leveraged-proxy package compare with a dollar-matched unlevered package. Both packages were near delta-flat. Gamma on the leveraged package was 93 versus 49 on the unlevered package. Theta was similar at -54 versus -58. Vega was 22 versus 46.

After implied volatility and the Greeks were scaled to the leverage and similar cash outlay, the side-by-side left little residual gap between the leveraged proxy and the unlevered index fund.

Breakeven moves on dollar-matched SSO and SPY straddles

Once cash outlay is matched, the 2x S&P 500 proxy still needs about twice the percentage swing of SPY for the straddle to break even: 7 percent up or 6.5 percent down versus 3.5 and 3.2 percent. That two-to-one band is already in the premium, so the extra punch is not a free overlay. The percentages are those stated in the article for the May 11, 2010 snapshot.
Once cash outlay is matched, the 2x S&P 500 proxy still needs about twice the percentage swing of SPY for the straddle to break even: 7 percent up or 6.5 percent down versus 3.5 and 3.2 percent. That two-to-one band is already in the premium, so the extra punch is not a free overlay. The percentages are those stated in the article for the May 11, 2010 snapshot.SSO May 41 and SPY May 116 straddles · Front-month May 2010 · 2010-05-11T00:00:00.000Z to 2010-05-11T00:00:00.000Z

Front-month at-the-money straddles a few days after the May 2010 flash crash, sized as 4 SSO May 41 contracts versus 3 SPY May 116 contracts on a hypothetical $50,000 book. The SSO downside is the article’s rounded 6.50 percent.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
13 of 19 in the Index proxy comparison track
201351-51 pp.Next on Index proxy comparisonInheritance as an index-proxy and allocation caseA 30-name industrial average and a 500-name large-cap index both change membership, so a buy-and-hold basket of original names is not the same object as the published index.
All readings on this track · 19 readings
  1. 1992Country regime inside global allocation and index proxies
  2. 1992Intermarket confirmation for long-duration bond-fund timing
  3. 1993Paired bond and currency proxies with weekly crossover confirmation
  4. 1995Walk-forward evaluation of a municipal futures timed fund switch
  5. 1999Regime-gated allocation with bounded index leverage
  6. 1999Testing trend following with cash-price controls
  7. 2002A capital-preservation case for index-proxy allocation
  8. 2003A shared weekly-average grid for four Asian index proxies
  9. 2005Index-etf-core weights, a growth-index-clock, and an implementation-cost-ledger
  10. 2005European index proxies as one weekly-regime panel
  11. 2006Index-fund proxies as intermarket regime instruments
  12. 2006Constructing metal option exposure with mining proxies and implied volatility
  13. 2010Matched straddles on levered versus unlevered index proxies
  14. 2013Inheritance as an index-proxy and allocation case
  15. 2014Headline index levels mix a changing basket with a changing divisor
  16. 2017Screening ETFs by liquidity, index fit, and rank
  17. 2019Leveraged commodity proxies fail the futures test
  18. 2020Constructing pre-listing paths for new fund sleeves
  19. 2020A sleeve after cost-drag, judged by an index-proxy, sized in a stock-bond mix
All 28 readings tagged Index proxy comparison
Also on Index proxy comparison5 readings