2004issue C101
Implied-volatility premium on rate indexes
Implied volatility is scored as cheap or expensive against a market’s own history before a long or short rates-options structure is eligible. Yield-index options can express a view on future rates, but thinner liquidity makes a comparison with maturity-bucket bond-fund options part of bounding the risk-reward ratio.
- Implied volatility is a cheap-versus-expensive premium signal scored against a contract’s own history before a long or short structure is considered.
- Government yield indexes scale the current yield by ten and move inversely to the related bond’s price, so listed options on those indexes can express a view on future rates or bond prices.
- Yield-index options are thinly traded, with limited open liquidity and often wide bid-offer spreads, while options on the longest-maturity government-bond fund are described as more active.
- Buyer-oriented structures are matched to cheap premium when implied volatility is expected to rise, and seller-oriented structures to expensive premium when it is expected to fall, which is how the risk-reward ratio is bounded before entry.
Score premium against its own history
Implied volatility is treated as a cheap-versus-expensive premium signal. Low implied volatility means options are cheap. High implied volatility means they are expensive.
A stock- or index-specific implied-volatility history, plus a screen that ranks high versus low implied volatility, is used to judge whether current premium is high or low versus its own past and to locate relatively cheap or expensive contracts.
Broad equity-index volatility gauges reflect implied volatility of specific index options and can differ substantially from implied volatility on individual stocks at the same time. The comparison that matters is a market versus its own past, not a single all-market volatility reading.
TradersWeek editorial reading: treat the implied-volatility regime as the gate on any rates-options idea. Score premium as cheap or expensive against that market’s own history before a long or short structure is even eligible.
What a yield index offers
Five-year, ten-year, and thirty-year government-yield indexes equal the current yield multiplied by ten, so a 4 percent ten-year yield corresponds to an index level of 40.
Those yield indexes move inversely to bond prices: a decline in the ten-year note’s price is associated with a rise in the ten-year yield index.
Listed options exist on the five-year, ten-year, and thirty-year yield indexes and can express a view on future rates or bond prices, including call purchases or bull call spreads when a rate rise is the working assumption.
Compare liquidity before bounding risk and reward
Options on those yield indexes are described as thinly traded, with limited open liquidity and often wide bid-offer spreads. A wide bid-offer spread marks a vehicle whose listed options may be hard to enter or exit cleanly.
In April 2003, options were listed on three government-bond funds spanning one-to-three-year, seven-to-ten-year, and twenty-plus-year maturities, and the longest-maturity fund is described as more active and liquid than the yield indexes.
TradersWeek editorial reading: after the premium regime is scored, compare yield-index options with those maturity-bucket bond-fund options so liquidity can actually support the risk-reward bound.
Match the structure to the premium regime
Option-premium analysis is the judgment of whether current option prices are cheap or expensive so a buyer-oriented or seller-oriented structure can be matched to the prevailing volatility regime.
Aligning structure with premium regime is presented as a way to improve an options trade’s risk-reward ratio: buyer-oriented structures when premium is cheap and implied volatility is expected to rise, seller-oriented structures when premium is expensive and implied volatility is expected to fall.
The risk-reward ratio is the balance of potential loss versus potential gain on an options structure, bounded before entry by aligning the long or short premium stance with whether implied volatility is low or high.
All readings on this track · 27 readings
- 1987Precommit the stop and require a surplus payoff
- 1987When open losses overwrite precommitted exit rules
- 1991Ranking month-end holds with risk-reward and stops
- 1994Evaluating percentage profit exits on trend-following averages
- 2001Construct reward to risk before entry
- 2003A pre-trade readiness checklist for entry, abstention, and risk
- 2003Evaluating out-of-the-money strikes with saddle premiums and implied volatility
- 2004A critique of one-procedure trading decisions
- 2004Mechanical stops leak intent and misprice losses
- 2004Implied-volatility premium on rate indexes
- 2006Keep the stop that authorized the entry
- 2006Bound the loss with a risk-to-reward filter before entry
- 2007Audit the operator before abandoning a system
- 2007Failed-break slingshot reversal rules
- 2007A system-management template that sets the stop and the required reward before entry
- 2007Construct a pre-trade style envelope for entries and skips
- 2008Systems that skip the three decision gates
- 2010Four-gate veto before trend entries
- 2012Construct a trading plan as one written procedure
- 2012Forex stops and reward targets by quote increment
- 2013The average directional index as a lookback cluster and a risk-reward bound
- 2014A three-step worksheet for VIX futures tick value and low-vol risk-reward
- 2014Binary option premia, fees, and pre-expiry risk-reward
- 2015Selling far out-of-the-money commodity option premium as a forgiving timing case
- 2016Prepaid option spreads that bound range-day risk and reward
- 2016Pre-trade risk-reward versus instinctive exits
- 2020Bounding a short-dated option spread with a stop, a gap remainder, and a credit exit