2006issue C021-4
Keep the stop that authorized the entry
A trading psychology process critique says a position often outlives the opinion that justified it. The stop-loss order and the risk-reward ratio stay fixed from the entry that authorized the trade.
- A position often survives after the opinion that justified it has already been invalidated.
- Invalidation is defined before entry, and mechanical stop-loss orders stay in place even when a pullback tempts cancellation.
- The risk-reward ratio is fixed from entry, target, and stop before the trade is placed.
- Widening the stop after entry is described as converting a planned three-to-one payoff into an even or worse-than-even payoff.
When the justifying opinion is already gone
The process critique is that a position often survives after the opinion that justified it has already been invalidated. In the trading psychology process, invalidation must be defined before entry, and mechanical stops are to stay in place even when a pullback tempts cancellation.
Observable bounds, not a session forecast
Recent highs and lows are used as observable bounds. The procedure is to recognize a failed extension when it occurs, not to forecast the session in advance. An initial protective stop is placed at the prior range low because a break of that bound is treated as a point where downside movement can accelerate.
A holding period set by price
Holding period is treated as a price-action rule. A stop or target hit sooner than expected is executed rather than held to a mental clock. Once a target is reached, a trailing stop is allowed a limited pullback and is tightened as price nears longer-horizon resistance.
One testable procedure
Candidate selection is framed as one testable procedure using price, time, volume, and velocity, then checked against historical bars. Those historical checks are described as weighting recent price action more heavily than older history.
Risk and reward fixed from the entry
Risk and reward are fixed from entry, target, and stop before the trade is placed. Risking one dollar to make forty cents is cited as a rejected setup. Widening the stop after entry is described as converting a planned three-to-one payoff into an even or worse-than-even payoff.
All readings on this track · 27 readings
- 1987Precommit the stop and require a surplus payoff
- 1987When open losses overwrite precommitted exit rules
- 1991Ranking month-end holds with risk-reward and stops
- 1994Evaluating percentage profit exits on trend-following averages
- 2001Construct reward to risk before entry
- 2003A pre-trade readiness checklist for entry, abstention, and risk
- 2003Evaluating out-of-the-money strikes with saddle premiums and implied volatility
- 2004A critique of one-procedure trading decisions
- 2004Mechanical stops leak intent and misprice losses
- 2004Implied-volatility premium on rate indexes
- 2006Keep the stop that authorized the entry
- 2006Bound the loss with a risk-to-reward filter before entry
- 2007Audit the operator before abandoning a system
- 2007Failed-break slingshot reversal rules
- 2007A system-management template that sets the stop and the required reward before entry
- 2007Construct a pre-trade style envelope for entries and skips
- 2008Systems that skip the three decision gates
- 2010Four-gate veto before trend entries
- 2012Construct a trading plan as one written procedure
- 2012Forex stops and reward targets by quote increment
- 2013The average directional index as a lookback cluster and a risk-reward bound
- 2014A three-step worksheet for VIX futures tick value and low-vol risk-reward
- 2014Binary option premia, fees, and pre-expiry risk-reward
- 2015Selling far out-of-the-money commodity option premium as a forgiving timing case
- 2016Prepaid option spreads that bound range-day risk and reward
- 2016Pre-trade risk-reward versus instinctive exits
- 2020Bounding a short-dated option spread with a stop, a gap remainder, and a credit exit