1996issue C061-4
Constructing fade rules from an empirical deviation histogram
Price distance from a moving average is binned into an empirical deviation histogram, then turned into a cumulative percent-below curve. Those frequencies label ordinary and extreme states so a fade can wait for a one-point reversal, stand aside in a rare tail, and share one pre-set point stop.
- The construction subtracts a moving average from price, bins the deviations, and turns the counts into a cumulative percent-below curve that labels ordinary, uncommon, and extreme prints.
- On one-minute S&P futures deviations from a one-day average, 47 percent of prints sat within one point of that average, 42 percent sat below it, and a five-point rise was treated as extreme because 99 percent of observations were lower.
- A print at an extreme band is not treated as an automatic return to the balance line. The fade still waits for a one-point reversal off that band or through the average.
- Example rules abstain more than two points on the wrong side of the average, flatten when price tags the mean, cap any loss at 1.5 points, and require the frequency study to be rebuilt because the curves change.
How the histogram is built
The construction begins by subtracting a moving average from price, binning those deviations, counting frequencies, and plotting the histogram. A cumulative percent-below curve is then formed by summing lower bins and dividing by the total count.
The moving average is the balance line, the center of the constructed model and later a flatten or reverse reference. The empirical deviation histogram counts how often price occupied each bin of distance from that average. The cumulative percent-below curve is the running share of observations that sat beneath a given deviation, and it is what labels ordinary, uncommon, and extreme prints.
Monte Carlo simulation, in the sense used here, takes ordered price prints over a stated interval and lookback, builds an explicit frequency baseline, and judges later prints against that baseline rather than against a textbook curve.
What the one-minute sample showed
On one-minute S&P futures deviations from a one-day average, the empirical histogram held more mass between minus one and plus one point than a matched normal curve, skewed left, and showed extra extremes near plus and minus 3.5 points.
The same sample placed 42 percent of prints below the one-day average and 47 percent within one point of it. A five-point rise above the average was treated as an extreme because 99 percent of observations were lower.
Most of those one-minute prints stayed within 4.5 points of the one-day average, yet seven- and eight-point departures still occurred.
Why a Gaussian baseline is set aside
A random uncorrelated series is assigned a Hurst exponent of 0.5. The S&P 500 measurement used in this construction is 0.78, which is presented as incompatible with a Gaussian random-walk baseline used in many option models.
A short path and the extreme band
On a six-day S&P 500 futures path, bands at the one-day average plus or minus three points were described so that 94 percent of prices sat below the upper band and 96 percent sat above the lower band.
Those thresholds function as an extreme band: a deviation taken from the histogram so new risk is not added when price already occupies a rare tail. The path study shows price can remain at the extreme, so the constructed fade still waits for a one-point reversal off that band or through the average.
One procedure for entry, exit, and abstention
Mean reversion, in the sense used here, treats large departures from a local average as states that historically resolve toward that average, without fixing when the return occurs or where the average will then sit. Example rules abstain from buying more than two points above the average or selling more than two points below it, flatten when price tags the mean, and only initiate after a one-point move up from a low extreme, down from a high extreme, or through the average.
The same example set caps any loss at 1.5 points for the life of the position. That cap is a stop-loss: a precommitted loss bound, set in price points before entry and held for the life of the position, so adverse excursion cannot expand without a forced exit. The deviation study must be rebuilt periodically because the frequency curves change.
The listed rules are offered only as a translation of the empirical model into a single back-testable procedure, not as a finished live system.
All readings on this track · 26 readings
- 1989Known-bias price streams for system evaluation
- 1989Constructing holdout-checked synthetic prices from chaos maps
- 1991Closing the feedback loop in auction market simulations
- 1994Evaluating eight-year election regimes
- 1995Constructing equity versus leverage with resampled trades
- 1995Stock leverage from compounded returns and margin cost
- 1996Constructing and optimizing volatility position-sizing profiles
- 1996Constructing fade rules from an empirical deviation histogram
- 1998Return-path volatility and the recovery burden
- 1999Monte Carlo checks beyond a single historical path
- 2002Monte Carlo equity paths from win rate and profit factor
- 2003Checking a small system edge with Monte Carlo simulation
- 2003Evaluate a mechanical trading system with a stop-loss order and Monte Carlo simulation
- 2005Evaluating momentum rank rotation under portfolio constraints
- 2009Bounded risk and rank rotation in portfolio construction
- 2010A calendar for walk-forward robustness and Monte Carlo evaluation
- 2012Treat the optimize view as an evaluation protocol
- 2013Entry, exit and abstention as one testable procedure
- 2014Evaluating stop and target bounds before fading large moves
- 2014Evaluating system exits when markets get noisier
- 2015Memory-bearing synthetics for dominant-cycle spectra
- 2015Constructing next-session implied-volatility forecasts by reordering closes
- 2016Mechanical systems as a gated factory
- 2017Four-sleeve Monte Carlo annual-loss bounds
- 2018When to retire a mechanical system with Monte Carlo drawdown limits
- 2020Treat mechanical system design as a revalidation lifecycle