Skip to main content
Track Base building
10 / 17
Library

2006issue C011-4

Turning flat bases into breakout system rules

A quiet, narrow stretch is a chart condition. It becomes a breakout system only after a confirmation buy-stop, an abstention path, and a dual-average exit are written in advance, so a failed next-session stop is a designed result of the same procedure as taking the trade.

  • A flat base is read as low interest and tight trading. A flat-base breakout is a close through the highest high of the prior 60 days after that quiet stretch, preferably with a sharp volume increase.
  • The mechanical scan is only the first pass. A candidate profile then reduces remaining names by size, volume, ownership, group strength, news, market regime, overhead supply, and listing.
  • The entry rule does not buy the breakout print. It places a next-session confirmation buy-stop about 0.25 above that day's high so an immediate failure is not filled.
  • Abstention and the dual-average exit belong to the same written procedure. A 7 percent protective sell-stop sits under a fill, and the planned sale is the session after a 3-day closing exponential average turns down through a 6-day closing exponential average.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A chart condition, not an order

A flat base is a stretch of narrow, low-participation price action that precedes a breakout attempt. In the archive workflow it is read as low interest and tight trading, often a visually narrow or only gently rising stretch with quiet volume.

A flat-base breakout is defined as a session whose close exceeds the highest high of the prior 60 days after that quiet stretch. The breakout session is read as a sudden one-day imbalance shown in both price and volume, preferably with a sharp volume increase.

The first-pass scan

On the latest close, the candidate scan requires a close above the prior 60-day peak close, a close below 50, a close above that day's open and at least 2, a 63-day exponential average of volume at or below 500,000 as of the prior session, a higher close than the prior session, and volume at least five times the 60-day minimum and three times the prior day's volume.

The candidate profile

After the scan, remaining names are reduced by a candidate profile. That second pass prefers a small share count, low typical volume, a strong industry-group relative-strength grade, substantial insider ownership, a large breakout-day volume multiple, little or no accompanying news, a quiet prior tape, a confirmed bullish market, no overhead supply from the prior 12 months, and listing on one specified electronic market.

When two candidates remain, the procedure prefers the stronger industry group, then the higher relative-strength reading, then the smaller share count.

Confirmation, fill, and abstention

The entry rule does not buy the breakout print. It places a confirmation buy-stop about 0.25 above that day's high for the next session so a failure to continue is not filled.

Immediately after a fill, a protective sell-stop is placed 7 percent below the execution price.

Abstention means leaving a scanned name untraded when the next-session stop is not elected or the candidate profile is not met.

The dual-average exit

While the position is open, the planned exit is a next-session market sale after a 3-day closing exponential average turns down through a 6-day closing exponential average.

In the reviewed cases, most of those average-cross exits arrived 14 to 35 days after the breakout, so the designed holding period is several weeks. Three illustrated names show a high-volume lift from a multi-week base followed by a later 3-day versus 6-day average-cross exit.

Editorial: one written procedure

Editorial: TradersWeek treats the quiet base as a chart condition that becomes a breakout system only after confirmation, abstention, and the dual-average exit are written in advance. A failed next-session stop is a designed outcome of the same procedure as taking the trade, so entry, sitting out, and exit can be tested together.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
10 of 17 in the Base building track
20071-3 pp.Next on Base buildingBase-building holds versus swing timingA longer holding-period procedure is written for long sideways stretches later interrupted by momentum bursts or a gap series.
All readings on this track · 17 readings
  1. 1994Cup-and-handle base construction and volume breakout
  2. 1996Constructing a mobility oscillator from price distributions
  3. 1996Float turnover as a construction rule for bases and breakouts
  4. 2001A historically derived growth checklist for entry, exit, and staying out
  5. 2003Base-building then breakout after a market bottom
  6. 2005Commodity group bases, breakouts and pennants
  7. 2005Logic-first construction of a base-break system
  8. 2005Quiet bases copied onto an intradacy clock
  9. 2005Failed cup-with-handle after earnings and float filters
  10. 2006Turning flat bases into breakout system rules
  11. 2007Base-building holds versus swing timing
  12. 2007Confirmed index highs, style-fit trend systems, and bases
  13. 2007Name the sideways regime before you test the breakout
  14. 2011A three-peaks-and-a-domed-house chart is not a complete timing model
  15. 2014Constructing a volume-capacity channel from a sideways base
  16. 2016Waves, bases, and the campaign log on a price chart
  17. 2020Ratio charts as regime context for relative strength and yield spreads
All 19 readings tagged Base building
Also on Base building5 readings