Skip to main content
Track Base building
8 / 17
Library

2005issue C091-4

Quiet bases copied onto an intradacy clock

A 2005 interview treated daily chart formations as the same objects on one-minute, five-minute, and fifteen-minute charts. The preferred long was a long, relatively inactive base followed by a sudden volume increase and a price move through a range that had contained the name for months or years.

  • Daily formations were read as comparable objects on one-minute, five-minute, and fifteen-minute charts so a daily study could become a same-session forecast.
  • A long, relatively inactive base became a long setup only after a sudden volume increase and a price move through a range that had contained the name for months or years.
  • After the range break, continuation was judged by advances on heavier volume, pullbacks on lighter volume, and mid-trend flags and pennants.
  • Stops and exits came from trendlines, prior price support, and a pair of 21-day and 40-day moving averages, not from a fixed percentage.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Daily objects on an intradacy clock

After months of comparison, the 2005 interview subject treated formations that appear on daily charts as also appearing on one-minute, five-minute, and fifteen-minute charts. That match was used to shift work onto an intradacy horizon so positions need not be held overnight.

Pattern-recognition, in this archive sense, means reading the same chart formations as comparable objects on daily and intradacy sampling intervals so a daily study can become a same-session forecast.

A long quiet base and a volume-thrust

The preferred long setup was a long, relatively inactive base followed by a sudden volume increase and a price move through a range that had contained the name for months or years. Base-building is that long, relatively inactive price range, and it precedes any attempt to leave the range.

A breakout is a price move through the boundary of a prior range. In this workflow it was treated as a signal only when the move was accompanied by a sudden volume expansion. The volume-thrust is that abrupt increase in traded volume, and it was required before a price thrust out of the base could be treated as the possible start of an intermediate-to-longer trend.

Continuation after the range edge

After the range break, continuation was judged by advances on heavier volume, pullbacks on lighter volume, and mid-trend consolidations such as flags and pennants. A continuation-flag is that mid-trend pause, including flags and pennants, and it was judged constructive when those volume rules still held.

A small book and a staged entry

The described working book was three to eight names, with five or six given as a typical count. Twenty-five to thirty charts were scanned each session, and a buy was staged when a range break looked imminent.

Scale-out, second targets, and structure-stops

About 25 percent of a large long was scaled out at a chart-derived target. Remaining shares were kept only if the stock then backed off and consolidated in an orderly, bullish way on light volume, after which a second target was set. Scale-out is that reduction of a stated fraction at the first chart-derived target, with the remainder kept only if the following pullback stays orderly and light in volume.

Stops and exits were placed from trendlines, prior price support, and a pair of 21-day and 40-day moving averages, not from a fixed percentage. The 40-day average was preferred because it tracked price more tightly than a 50-day average. A structure-stop is an exit level taken from those broken moving averages, trendlines, or prior price support rather than from a fixed percentage loss.

Stops that sat too close to entry were described as a common cause of whipsaws. Averaging a losing long was limited to same-session trades near apparent intradacy support and treated as risky on swing or intermediate holds. Short setups used the same rules inverted.

What the archive does not specify

Editorial reading only: keep the breakout hypothesis alive only while prior resistance, trendlines, and the closer moving average still agree. The archive says later targets were chart-derived and does not specify the construction. In editorial terms, that later map can be called trend-projection, meaning later resistance is estimated by extending trendlines and angles and by noting where earlier highs or congestion may reappear.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
8 of 17 in the Base building track
20051-4 pp.Next on Base buildingFailed cup-with-handle after earnings and float filtersThe walk-through mixed fundamental and technical filters in roughly equal parts and began with leadership names in a strong sector rather than a random ticker.
All readings on this track · 17 readings
  1. 1994Cup-and-handle base construction and volume breakout
  2. 1996Constructing a mobility oscillator from price distributions
  3. 1996Float turnover as a construction rule for bases and breakouts
  4. 2001A historically derived growth checklist for entry, exit, and staying out
  5. 2003Base-building then breakout after a market bottom
  6. 2005Commodity group bases, breakouts and pennants
  7. 2005Logic-first construction of a base-break system
  8. 2005Quiet bases copied onto an intradacy clock
  9. 2005Failed cup-with-handle after earnings and float filters
  10. 2006Turning flat bases into breakout system rules
  11. 2007Base-building holds versus swing timing
  12. 2007Confirmed index highs, style-fit trend systems, and bases
  13. 2007Name the sideways regime before you test the breakout
  14. 2011A three-peaks-and-a-domed-house chart is not a complete timing model
  15. 2014Constructing a volume-capacity channel from a sideways base
  16. 2016Waves, bases, and the campaign log on a price chart
  17. 2020Ratio charts as regime context for relative strength and yield spreads
All 19 readings tagged Base building
Also on Base building5 readings