Skip to main content
Track Expected value
21 / 22
Library

2017issue C1110-17

Size ladder tests for drawdown caps and expected value

The archive kept a fixed share count, charged a 5-dollar commission and a 5-dollar slippage cost on every entry and exit, and compared setups with expected return per trade. Maximum intraday drawdown was treated as the equity that had to be prepaid to run each size on the ladder.

  • A fixed share count, no profit reinvestment, and a 5-dollar commission plus 5-dollar slippage charge on every entry and exit stayed inside the same test stack.
  • Expected return per trade, defined as win rate times average win plus loss rate times average loss, was used to compare individual entry and exit setups as size changed.
  • Dedicated stops, contraction, expansion, and side-specific volume gates were part of the procedure, not later overlays applied after size was chosen.
  • Return on account treated maximum intraday drawdown as the prepaid equity for a given size, and the 100-share one-contract row was split out because it did not follow the smaller-size group.
Entries in this reading3 entries

What the size ladder held fixed

The archive traded a fixed share count and did not reinvest profits. A 5-dollar commission plus a 5-dollar slippage charge was applied on every entry and exit.

Long and short procedures were run separately. Only one side could be open at a time, and each side could use its own fast and slow lengths. Costs, stops, skip rules, and those side settings stayed in place while share count changed.

Expected value as a setup filter

Expected return per trade was defined as win rate times average win plus loss rate times average loss. That figure was used to compare individual entry and exit setups.

Expected value, in the sense used here, is a probability-weighted estimate of average outcome per trade. It is applied as a filter before entry and again as size changes.

Dedicated stops instead of a conventional stop-loss

Conventional stop-losses were omitted. Most entries carried dedicated stops that usually needed extra conditions such as contraction before they could execute.

Some long entries fixed a channel stop at the 25-bar lower band offset by 1.5 times average true range. Another long stop moved with each bar’s low by the same 1.5-times offset and did not require contraction.

A long-side rule placed a stop at the low after a 500-dollar open loss if both the fast and slow curves were below that low. On the short side, two consecutive trades with a growing loss could set a close-based stop instead of a conventional stop-loss.

Expansion, contraction, and volume gates

Expansion was required in 2 of 6 entries. Contraction was required in 9 of 14 exits, including several stops. A missing expansion was used to skip a sideways failed breakout.

Expansion is a widening gap between a faster and a slower regression curve, used to allow some entries and to skip flat failed breakouts. Contraction is a narrowing gap between those curves, used as a required extra condition on many exits and stops rather than as a standalone close.

Volume scaled into a 0-to-1 range gated entries differently by side. Longs allowed values up to 0.5. Shorts required values above 0.85 or 0.9. That scaled series is normalized volume: volume scaled into a 0-to-1 range from its recent high and low, then used as a side-specific gate.

Prepaid equity on the share-count ladder

The same procedure was tabulated across 2 through 12 shares and a 100-share one-contract case. The table was then split for analysis because the one-contract row behaved differently from the smaller-size group.

Return on account was defined as net profit divided by maximum intraday drawdown. That drawdown figure was treated as the equity required to run the size, which is the prepaid equity that a drawdown limit is meant to bound before a trade is placed and while it is open. Expected return versus share count was described as a straight line in that test design.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
21 of 22 in the Expected value track
201730-33 pp.Next on Expected valueEvaluate a high-yield correlation break as one locked procedureA correlation-breakdown is not yet a timing rule. The historical workflow required the short gate, the stand-aside-rule, and a fixed-horizon-exit to sit in one rule-based-entry procedure.
All readings on this track · 22 readings
  1. 1995A pre-trade checklist that bounds loss before the order
  2. 1998Ledger audit of exits, payoff, and overlap
  3. 1998A return-to-loss filter for drawdown-aware evaluation
  4. 2000Pair historical volatility with return-to-loss filters
  5. 2001Credit-spread construction that can fail before any order is sent
  6. 2002Evaluating mechanical systems in a traders market
  7. 2002Profitability as a bound implied by RWL and commission
  8. 2004A day-trading breakeven matrix for size and win rate
  9. 2006Sit out, size and expectancy as one procedure
  10. 2006A testable intraday procedure from setup to stand-down
  11. 2007A planned liquidity offer at the inflection point
  12. 2011A style-neutral expectancy filter for system evaluation
  13. 2011Separate buying power from posted risk capital
  14. 2012Design before you trade: testing mechanical systems
  15. 2014Ideal trader hindsight as a pretrade filter
  16. 2014When expectancy and drawdown limits disagree
  17. 2015Signal, confirm, and invalidate before the trade
  18. 2015Price the win, stall, and loss before a stock entry
  19. 2016Construct expectancy by bounding losses and winner size
  20. 2017Estimate expectancy before you accept the trade
  21. 2017Size ladder tests for drawdown caps and expected value
  22. 2017Evaluate a high-yield correlation break as one locked procedure
All 40 readings tagged Expected value
Also on Expected value5 readings