Skip to main content
Track Expected value
11 / 22
Search the archiveLibrary
Library

2007issue C071-5

A planned liquidity offer at the inflection point

The archive workflow buys weakness in a rising market and sells strength in a falling one, with the profit target chosen before the order is placed. An inflection point is the deeper short-timeframe pullback used as the place to offer that liquidity, after the loss has already been bounded.

  • Buy weakness in a rising market and sell strength in a falling market, with the profit target chosen before the trade is placed.
  • Treat an inflection point as a deeper short-timeframe pullback at a Fibonacci landmark while the 60-minute, daily, and weekly charts stay with the higher-timeframe trend.
  • Form the entry zone from Fibonacci retracements, the 15- and 39-period moving averages, and flipped support or resistance, then place the stop from the same Fibonacci structure.
  • Prefer the bid after an 11-period high to a settled retest, and use the expected-value habit to accept a bounded loss inside a flexible template.
Entries in this reading3 entries
Current trackExpected value40 readingsTrading psychology process58 readingsFibonacci retracement98 readings

The described process buys weakness in rising markets and sells strength in falling markets. Profit targets are chosen before the trade is placed. The pullback is not treated as a late confirmation to chase. It is treated as the moment when liquidity can be offered while the higher-timeframe trend remains in place.

What counts as an inflection point

An inflection point is a deeper short-timeframe pullback at a Fibonacci landmark while the 60-minute, daily, and weekly charts remain in the higher-timeframe trend. It is a candidate place to offer liquidity rather than a reason to wait for a bounce.

A four-period pullback after an 11-period high is treated as a non-factor for trend filters such as a vertical-horizontal filter or ADX. Those checks exist to stop a trader from buying weakness after a move has already exhausted itself. An ordinary short pullback of that kind does not count as exhaustion.

Where the candidate zone is marked

Candidate entry zones form when Fibonacci retracements, the 15- and 39-period moving averages, and support-turned-resistance or resistance-turned-support levels coincide. Those flipped levels are used as liquidity landmarks together with Fibonacci and the moving averages, not as a standalone trigger.

Fibonacci price structure is used to locate stop placement as well as the entry zone. The loss is therefore bounded before liquidity is offered.

Sit on the bid, then take profit on agreement

The process prefers sitting on the bid after an 11-period high rather than waiting for a settled retest. The archive view is that institutional buy programs often reinitiate on the pullback.

A programmed trend-reversal index is used to detect divergence, but only as a profit-taking cue, and only when several Fibonacci levels already align at a longer-term resistance. It is not used as an entry signal.

Bound the loss, then keep the template flexible

Poker is presented as having a more definable positive expected value than a market trade. The same expected-value habit is used to justify taking a bounded loss once the stop has already been placed from the Fibonacci structure.

The operating template is treated as flexible position management, not a single-trade script that behaves the same way every time.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
11 of 22 in the Expected value track
201142-44 pp.Next on Expected valueA style-neutral expectancy filter for system evaluationA single expectancy score can compare methods that differ in style, holding period, and payoff shape because it combines win frequency with average payoff size.
All readings on this track · 22 readings
  1. 1995A pre-trade checklist that bounds loss before the order
  2. 1998Ledger audit of exits, payoff, and overlap
  3. 1998A return-to-loss filter for drawdown-aware evaluation
  4. 2000Pair historical volatility with return-to-loss filters
  5. 2001Credit-spread construction that can fail before any order is sent
  6. 2002Evaluating mechanical systems in a traders market
  7. 2002Profitability as a bound implied by RWL and commission
  8. 2004A day-trading breakeven matrix for size and win rate
  9. 2006Sit out, size and expectancy as one procedure
  10. 2006A testable intraday procedure from setup to stand-down
  11. 2007A planned liquidity offer at the inflection point
  12. 2011A style-neutral expectancy filter for system evaluation
  13. 2011Separate buying power from posted risk capital
  14. 2012Design before you trade: testing mechanical systems
  15. 2014Ideal trader hindsight as a pretrade filter
  16. 2014When expectancy and drawdown limits disagree
  17. 2015Signal, confirm, and invalidate before the trade
  18. 2015Price the win, stall, and loss before a stock entry
  19. 2016Construct expectancy by bounding losses and winner size
  20. 2017Estimate expectancy before you accept the trade
  21. 2017Size ladder tests for drawdown caps and expected value
  22. 2017Evaluate a high-yield correlation break as one locked procedure
By fieldDecision process76 readingsBy year200776 readings
All 40 readings tagged Expected value
Also on Expected value5 readings
1998Ledger audit of exits, payoff, and overlap2006Sit out, size and expectancy as one procedure2006A testable intraday procedure from setup to stand-down2015Why win-rate chasing fails the decision process2015Signal, confirm, and invalidate before the trade