2018issue C0114-19
Evaluating profit-taking and reentry in trend following
Profit-taking was expected to raise the share of winning trades in Trend following, but cutting off a fat-tail run raised a reentry question. In the historical tests, none of the reentry methods approached the net results of the simple trend system that neither took profits nor reentered.
- In the 80-day trend tests, only about 35% to 36% of trades were profitable even in markets described as trending, and winning trades lasted four to six times longer than losing trades.
- The fat tail was a small set of unusually long, large winning trades whose gains were three to four times the size of the losses on the opposite side of the distribution.
- Profit-taking raised the profitable-trade rate to 43.4% on a euro high-low breakout and to 50.2% on an S&P high-low breakout, while the S&P case saw net results and profit factor fall sharply.
- Across the tested reentry choices, time in the market and exposure declined, but none of the reentry methods approached the net results of the simple trend system that neither took profits nor reentered.
Profit-taking and the reentry question
Profit-taking was expected to raise the share of winning trades, but also to change the system profile if it cut off a later fat-tail run, which then raised the question of whether reentry was required.
The simple trend profile
Macrotrend holding periods were framed as roughly 40 to 120 days, with about 80 days used as a representative calculation period and 150 days treated as an upper bound that starts to resemble buy-and-hold.
In the 80-day trend tests, only about 35% to 36% of trades were profitable even in markets described as trending, and winning trades lasted four to six times longer than losing trades.
The fat tail was defined as a small set of unusually long, large winning trades whose gains were three to four times the size of the losses on the opposite side of the distribution.
The profit target
A long-side profit target was specified as entry price plus a profit factor times the 20-day average true range, with the same term subtracted for shorts.
Reentry after the target
On a euro high-low breakout with a 4.5 profit factor and a 1.0 minimum retracement, the profitable-trade rate rose to 43.4%, while time in the market stayed near 95% because reentry occurred quickly.
On an S&P high-low breakout with a 2.0 profit factor and a 1.0 minimum retracement, the profitable-trade rate rose to 50.2% while net results and profit factor fell sharply.
Across the tested reentry choices, time in the market and exposure declined and the percentage of profitable trades rose, but none of the reentry methods approached the net results of the simple trend system that neither took profits nor reentered.
The recurring failure of reentry was the gap after an exit: if price kept moving in the original direction, the missed portion of the move was hard to recover.
All readings on this track · 18 readings
- 1988Constructing a mechanical trend system with independent trailing exits
- 1991Write a staged RSI exit book with trailing stops
- 1993Evaluating filter-trigger trailing exits after breakouts
- 1995Weekly-close breakout entry and trailing exit in Eurodollars
- 1996Evaluating moving-average turn entries and slope exits
- 1997Precommit an equity-risk cap and a profit-retracement exit
- 1998Exit stops before entries
- 1998Exit rules evaluated with a fixed random entry
- 2002Construct the stay-or-flatten decision before entry
- 2006Audit the stop, trail, and risk-reward stack as one procedure
- 2007Building a momentum system with relative strength and trailing exits
- 2013When buy and hold needs a sell rule
- 2013A mechanical trend toolkit that turns screens into one entry-exit procedure
- 2014Is a two-period relative strength index, a channel breakout, and a trailing exit one long-only procedure?
- 2016Trend-aligned option entries and trailing exits
- 2017Monthly three-black candles as a trailing exit
- 2018Evaluating profit-taking and reentry in trend following
- 2020Treat the zigzag threshold as a volatility-scaled construction variable