2012issue C0222-33
Evaluating long-put moneyness when implied volatility shifts
Treat strike selection as a testable evaluation of a long-put plan. Compare theoretical percentage outcomes across percent-moneyness under an assumed move, implied-volatility path, and holding window, then read the curve only as a regime-aware guide.
- Percent-moneyness is the signed distance of a strike from spot as a percentage of spot: positive when in-the-money, zero when at-the-money, and negative when out-of-the-money.
- A percent-moneyness-percent-profit-curve values the same European index option at the start and end of an assumed trend, converts the two prices into a percentage change, and repeats the calculation across strikes with time-to-maturity held fixed.
- On the typical put curve in a downtrend with rising implied-volatility, an optimal-moneyness and a breakeven-moneyness appear, and both depend mainly on the assumed market move, the implied-volatility change, the starting implied-volatility level, and time-to-maturity.
- Read the theoretical curve as raw guidance for out-of-the-money versus in-the-money choice, not as a precise profit or exact optimal-moneyness reading, and be wary of erratic results in very cheap or thinly traded strikes.
Strike choice as an evaluation
Editorial framing: treat strike selection as a testable evaluation of a long-put plan. A long-put here is a purchased European put on a broad stock-index underlying, evaluated as a directional holding through an expected decline.
The archive workflow compares theoretical percentage outcomes across percent-moneyness under an assumed move, an implied-volatility path, and a stated holding window. Editorial reading: use the finished percent-moneyness-percent-profit-curve only as a regime-aware guide for when out-of-the-money puts beat deeper strikes.
Percent-moneyness
Percent-moneyness is how far in-the-money an option is as a percentage of spot. The signed reading is positive when the option is in-the-money, zero when it is at-the-money, and negative when it is out-of-the-money.
The same definition is applied to every strike so that in-the-money, at-the-money, and out-of-the-money puts sit on one scale.
How the curve is built
A percent-moneyness-percent-profit-curve is built by valuing the same European index option at the start and end of an assumed trend with a pricing model, converting the two prices into a percentage change, and repeating the calculation across strikes while keeping time-to-maturity fixed.
European index put and call fair values can be computed from spot, strike, the continuous risk-free rate, time-to-maturity as a year fraction, and annualized volatility. The continuous rate is linked to the nominal annualized rate by a natural-log transform.
Implied-volatility is the annualized volatility input used to value the option at the start and end of the assumed trend. Time-to-maturity is the remaining life at the start of that trend and is held constant while strikes are compared.
Critical points on a typical put curve
On the typical curve for puts in a downtrend with rising implied-volatility, two critical points appear. Optimal-moneyness is the percent-moneyness that produces the highest theoretical percentage profit under the assumed path. Breakeven-moneyness is the least percent-moneyness that still avoids a theoretical loss even when the market moves in the option's favor.
Those two critical moneyness levels depend mainly on the percentage market move, the change in implied-volatility over the trend, the starting implied-volatility level, and the option's time-to-maturity.
A spreadsheet implementation
The evaluation can be implemented as a multi-sheet spreadsheet. User parameters include starting implied-volatility, days to maturity, expected spot change, starting spot, and expected implied-volatility change.
How to read the curve
Theoretical curves should be read dynamically as raw guidance for choosing out-of-the-money versus in-the-money options, not as precise profit or exact optimal-moneyness readings.
When cheaper puts look better
When theoretical curves favor out-of-the-money puts, a conservative allocation can still split risk between those cheaper puts and at-the-money puts rather than treating strike choice as all-or-nothing.
All readings on this track · 22 readings
- 1984A long silver put as a prepaid loss cap
- 1984Spectral window gates for index long puts
- 1990Breadth nonconfirmation as the gate for a volume fade and long-put case
- 2002Volatility-first construction for a bearish put or debit
- 2002Name the regime and the season before choosing a long put
- 2005Critique of put spreads versus outright long puts
- 2007Sector put hedges, automatic exercise, and pin risk
- 2008Margin shock, defined-debit options, and selective premium
- 2008Ranking in-the-money puts by breakeven rather than cheapest premium
- 2012Evaluating long-put moneyness when implied volatility shifts
- 2012Sizing a long butterfly for early assignment and a long option for gamma
- 2013Gold after the April break: option-spread vehicles and a long-put hedge
- 2014A defined-risk option case for the mid-February to mid-July energy window
- 2014Long put versus vertical debit spread on a Treasury ETF
- 2015Defined debit call spread on a health-insurer worksheet
- 2015Overbought technology index: a long put via an inverse proxy
- 2018Replace futures stops with short-dated long puts
- 2018Constructing short-dated long puts around weekly expiration
- 2018Four decisions before a portfolio protective put
- 2018Incremental producer hedging with puts and risk reversals
- 2019Put butterfly versus long put in a volatility spike
- 2020Scenario-first SPY put hedge: butterfly versus long put