Comparison
TradersWeek vs Exocharts
This is the closest format match on the list: browser-based, crypto-first, footprint at the centre. Which means the usual arguments do not apply — neither product is asking you to install Windows software or buy an exchange feed to see a cluster chart. Two things separate them, and both currently favour Exocharts. It covers many crypto venues rather than one, and reaches traditional markets through dxFeed; source and its browser plan is €28 per month against $120 for Premium here. source What TradersWeek puts on the other side is not a better footprint but a wider terminal around it: 28 order-flow layers plus automatic Elliott labeling, Smart Money, Wyckoff, Ichimoku and Gann, a 166-rule scanner and server-side paper trading, with a free core that opens without registration. All Exocharts facts below were checked against its own pages on 2026-08-11.
Which one fits
Choose Exocharts if
You read flow across several crypto venues rather than one, or you need traditional markets in the same browser tab. source You want the cheapest browser footprint of the two. source You want liquidations drawn alongside the footprint. source A desktop build matters to you as well as a web one. source
Choose TradersWeek if
You want the structural methods on the same chart as the tape rather than a dedicated order-flow tool. You want wave counts generated and scored automatically. You want to place an order — into a paper account, by click on the DOM, or through a bot on your own API key. You want to evaluate all of that before paying, on a free tier that does not expire.
One venue against many
This is the axis of the comparison, so it is worth being precise rather than diplomatic. A footprint describes the tape it was built from. Reading one venue's tape is a narrower claim about the market than reading several.
- What Exocharts reads
- Crypto from Binance, Bybit, BitMEX and other listed exchanges; traditional markets through dxFeed, including CME, NYMEX, Eurex and Nasdaq depending on the subscription. source Multiple crypto venues in one product means cross-exchange comparison is available to you, and dxFeed extends the reach past crypto — for a separate fee whose current amount is not published on the Exocharts pricing page. source
- What TradersWeek reads
- Binance spot trades, live over a WebSocket, plus forex, metals, indices through a MetaTrader bridge where prints are synthesised from quotes rather than counted. One venue, no perpetual futures tape and no exchange-traded futures. There is no data bill, and that is the same fact as the coverage limit rather than a separate advantage.
- Why it matters more here than elsewhere
- Against a Windows desktop platform, the browser argument carries the comparison. Against another browser terminal it carries nothing, so what remains is which tape you are reading and what the product does with it once read.
What each subscription contains
| Line item | Exocharts | TradersWeek |
|---|---|---|
| Free entry | Trial only, no registration: 3 pairs on desktop, one candle type on web. source | Permanent free tier: 123 indicators, wave labeling and paper trading, no card. Order flow is not in it |
| Paid plans | Desktop Pro €49, Web Premium €28 per month; lower on longer terms. source | Pro $30, Premium $120 per month. Order flow is Premium |
| Market data | dxFeed billed separately; price not published on its pricing page. source | Nothing on top. Binance public trade data carries no exchange fee |
| Where it runs | Windows and macOS desktop, plus browser. No native mobile listed. source | Any modern browser, installs as a PWA. No desktop build |
One caution that belongs to the reader rather than to either product: the Exocharts pricing page states €43 per month for three-month Desktop Pro on its tariff card and €46 in the FAQ below it. source Confirm the figure with the vendor before subscribing; a comparison page is not the right source for a number the vendor publishes twice.
Feature comparison
| Capability | Exocharts | TradersWeek |
|---|---|---|
| Venues | Crypto from Binance, Bybit, BitMEX and others; traditional markets through dxFeed. source | Binance spot, plus bridged forex, metals and indices |
| Price of browser footprint | Web Premium €28 per month source | Premium $120 per month, order flow included in it |
| Desktop build | Windows and macOS desktop, plus browser. No native mobile listed. source | None. Browser and PWA only |
| Liquidations on the chart | Listed alongside footprint, delta and imbalance source | Not covered |
| Capability | TradersWeek | Exocharts |
|---|---|---|
| Footprint | Bid and ask per level, delta, imbalance, absorption, exhaustion | Footprint with bid × ask, delta, imbalance and liquidations, plus profiles and TPO. source |
| Runs in a browser | Yes, and it is the only form the product takes | Yes, alongside a desktop build source |
| Profiles and TPO | Session and fixed-range volume profile, TPO, value area and POC | Profiles and TPO listed on the pricing page source |
| Capability | TradersWeek | Exocharts |
|---|---|---|
| Elliott Wave | Automatic in the free core: 24 wave patterns, counts scored against the rules | Not listed on its product or pricing pages. source |
| Order entry | Paper account, DOM click-to-trade on crypto, and bots on your own API key | Its FAQ states trading is not available in either plan. source |
| Permanent free tier | Yes, without registration: chart, indicators, drawings, wave labeling, paper trading | Trial only, no registration: 3 pairs on desktop, one candle type on web. source |
| Structural methodology | Smart Money, Wyckoff, Ichimoku, Gann and the rest, included in Premium | No published statement either way on the pages checked |
| Scripting | Script Converter reads 6 languages. No public API | Not listed on its product pages. source |
Questions people actually ask
Which is cheaper for browser footprint charts?
Exocharts. Its Web Premium plan is €28 per month, €23 on a six-month term. Order flow in TradersWeek sits in Premium at $120 per month. If browser-based footprint on crypto is the whole requirement, price points at Exocharts and this page will not argue otherwise. What the higher figure buys here is the rest of the terminal — automatic Elliott labeling, the methodology modules, the scanner and paper trading — rather than a better footprint.
Which one covers more exchanges?
Exocharts. It lists Binance, Bybit, BitMEX and other crypto venues, plus traditional markets through dxFeed including CME, NYMEX, Eurex and Nasdaq depending on the subscription. TradersWeek charts crypto from Binance spot only, US stocks as Binance perpetual contracts, and forex, metals and indices through a MetaTrader bridge. On venue coverage this is not a close comparison, and for anyone reading cross-exchange flow that answers the question.
Can I trade from either of them?
Not from Exocharts: its FAQ states that the trading feature is not available in Desktop Pro or Web. In TradersWeek the DOM panel takes limit orders by click on crypto, chart orders go to a server-side paper account, and trading bots send orders to an exchange through an API key you connect yourself. Neither product is a broker.
Does either of them label Elliott waves automatically?
Automatic Elliott labeling is not listed on the Exocharts product or pricing pages as of 2026-08-11. TradersWeek fits 24 wave patterns automatically, scores each count against the Elliott rules and keeps labels editable, in the free tier. That is a clear functional difference between two products that otherwise occupy the same format.
Is there a free version of either?
Exocharts offers a trial at €0 with no registration — Desktop Pro up to 3 pairs, Web limited to one candle type, limited history — but not a permanent free plan. TradersWeek is permanently free for the chart itself, 123 indicators, 82 drawing tools, wave labeling and paper trading, with no card and no registration; footprint and the other order-flow layers are Premium.
Does Exocharts run in a browser properly, or is desktop the real product?
Both exist, and the pricing page is worth reading closely before choosing. The desktop plan card lists Advanced DOM and Tape; the FAQ on that same page states the web version does not support DOM, while the web tariff card mentions it. That contradiction is on the vendor page and is not resolved there, so the web feature set is worth confirming with them directly rather than from any comparison, this one included.
For footprint on one venue at the lower price of the two, the answer above is not this product. For a wave count and a methodology stack on the same chart, open the free core — it needs no account, and the detector thresholds are published.
Open terminalLast reviewed 11 August 2026