2005issue C041-5
When trend rules need a losing filter
A Mechanical trading system is complete only when entry, exit and abstention are specified as one procedure. This archive note follows the case for Robustness testing, a Contrarian strategy on losing background breakouts, and designer-controlled parameter search after similar trend rules become crowded.
- Specify entry, exit and abstention together so a Mechanical trading system can be tested as one procedure rather than as separate discretionary judgments.
- Robustness testing asks a rule only to be passable in an old favorable era, a middling multi-year stretch and a recent bad year, not optimal in any single window.
- A Contrarian strategy takes a longer breakout only when a shorter background breakout is losing, a mark meant to show consolidation and forced liquidation.
- Keep parameter ranges under the designer's control and prefer selective, infrequent trading over densely parameterized short-horizon index procedures.
Keep the procedure in one package
A Mechanical trading system is treated as complete only when entry, exit and abstention are specified together. That package lets a designer test the rules as one procedure rather than as separate discretionary judgments.
When similar rules crowd the tape
The interview argues that markets became harder for trend-following procedures because more participants used similar rules. In that account, the market's job is to derail those systems.
A candidate volatility screen
Volatility screening is presented as a candidate refinement among trend-following candidates. The lower-volatility trades are treated as the more usable subset, even if further narrowing is an idea rather than a data result.
Robustness testing across unlike windows
Robustness testing is described as requiring a rule to have been merely passable in an old favorable era, a middling multi-year stretch and a recent bad year, rather than optimal in any single window.
Balance from the other sleeve
Trend-following and countertrend components are paired so that taking one kind of trade also produces the other. The pairing is meant to create a balance that can work when the trend-following sleeve does not.
When a longer breakout is allowed
A Contrarian strategy is specified for n-day breakouts: a longer breakout is taken only when a shorter background breakout is losing. That condition is meant to mark consolidation and forced liquidation rather than an already-trending tape.
Who controls the parameter search
Parameter search is kept under the designer's control. Ranges are assigned first, then any promising region is re-run repeatedly to narrow optimization rather than letting programmers invent numbers.
Short-horizon index procedures are criticized as easier to discover and quicker to be arbitraged away after they leave paper. Selectivity and infrequent trading are preferred over densely parameterized short-term systems.
All readings on this track · 20 readings
- 1986A pre-trade checklist for crowded trading methods
- 1988Contrary decision process versus lagging bullish consensus
- 1988Constructing contrarian signals from polled consensus
- 1989Constructing a ten-input breadth diffusion score
- 1989Even-number first penetration as a construction problem
- 1991Joint strength and sentiment rules for entries and exits
- 1995Evaluating contrarian sentiment thresholds for bond futures
- 1998A weekly composite-score that classifies despair, euphoria, or neither
- 1998Lagged phase clocks for market cycles
- 2003Process rules when a correct view fails
- 2003Closing stops and equity-curve filters as one decision process
- 2003One procedure for entry, exit, and standing aside
- 2004Cross-index volatility gauges as a premium regime map
- 2005When trend rules need a losing filter
- 2006Evaluating sector breadth as a contrarian regime filter
- 2011Sideline patience versus crowd noise
- 2012Assembling a sentiment zone oscillator as one contrarian filter
- 2012Currency regime context for fading rallies
- 2014When late trend confirmation is a sideline signal
- 2017Write a daily contrarian rule from the closed-end-fund discount