Skip to main content
Track Sector rotation
8 / 10
Library

2014issue C0136-38

Evaluating an annual contrarian sector rank-rotation

A rank-rotation rule selects an equal-dollar sleeve of the three weakest sectors by prior-year percentage return from a nine-sector fund universe and uses a one-year calendar hold. The archive places that lagged-loser sleeve beside a same-universe winner sleeve, a broad-market proxy, and an annual equal-weight high-yield stock basket.

  • The candidate universe is limited to nine sector funds covering materials, energy, industrial, financial, technology, consumer staples, utilities, health care, and consumer discretionary.
  • The rank-rotation rule buys an equal-dollar sleeve of the three weakest sectors by prior-year percentage return and uses a one-year calendar hold before repeating the rank.
  • The contrarian-strategy premise is that repeating business cycles can follow relatively weak sector years with relatively stronger ones.
  • Evaluation comparators include a same-universe prior-year winner sleeve, a broad-market proxy, and the high-yield stock basket, read on yearly percentage returns that omit dividend reinvestment.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A fixed nine-sector universe

The candidate universe is limited to nine sector funds covering materials, energy, industrial, financial, technology, consumer staples, utilities, health care, and consumer discretionary.

Rank-rotation is an annual reordering of that fixed sector universe by prior-year percentage return, then holding a fixed-count sleeve for the next calendar year.

The rank-rotation rule buys equal dollar amounts of the three weakest sectors by prior-year percentage return and holds that equal-dollar sleeve for one year before repeating the rank. The calendar hold leaves the selected sleeve unchanged until the next rank.

The procedure is framed as a sector-rotation counterpart to an annual equal-weight high-yield stock basket. Sector-rotation here means shifting capital among market-sector funds instead of among a short list of individual company stocks, substituting sector funds for a small number of individual company names.

Starting sleeve and contrarian-strategy premise

Because the sector funds' first full calendar year is 1999, the evaluated rotation sequence begins in 2000 with financials, consumer staples, and utilities as the lagged-loser sleeve.

The contrarian-strategy selects the prior year's weakest sectors. The archive premise is that repeating business cycles can follow relatively weak sector years with relatively stronger ones.

Evaluation comparators

A same-universe opposite rule that instead holds the three prior-year winners is computed as an academic comparator. Evaluation places the lagged-loser sleeve beside a broad-market proxy, the high-yield stock basket, and that prior-year winner sleeve, including a $10,000 initial-capital growth path across those four tracks.

Reported yearly percentage returns for the compared procedures omit the effect of reinvesting dividends.

Calendar-year returns of the three-laggard sector sleeve versus comparators

An equal-dollar sleeve of the three weakest Select Sector SPDRs by prior-year percentage return, held for one calendar year, is plotted beside SPY, the Dogs of the Dow high-yield basket, and a same-universe three-winner sleeve. The laggard sleeve’s path is the one to watch: a sharp 2000 rebound, a 2002 miss, a 2008 drawdown in line with the market, and a 2009 recovery that leaves a 70.56% cumulative gain against a 3.21% SPY loss. Values are the article’s published annual percentage returns for 2000–2012 and exclude dividend reinvestment.
An equal-dollar sleeve of the three weakest Select Sector SPDRs by prior-year percentage return, held for one calendar year, is plotted beside SPY, the Dogs of the Dow high-yield basket, and a same-universe three-winner sleeve. The laggard sleeve’s path is the one to watch: a sharp 2000 rebound, a 2002 miss, a 2008 drawdown in line with the market, and a 2009 recovery that leaves a 70.56% cumulative gain against a 3.21% SPY loss. Values are the article’s published annual percentage returns for 2000–2012 and exclude dividend reinvestment.Select Sector SPDRs versus SPY and Dogs of the Dow · Calendar year · 2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2012-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Yearly percentage returns do not include reinvested dividends. The nine Select Sector SPDRs’ first full calendar year was 1999, so the rank-rotation results begin in 2000 with a one-year hold.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
8 of 10 in the Sector rotation track
201443-50 pp.Next on Sector rotationA ranking workflow that treated sector rotation as an abstention procedureThe hypothetical tactical equity model was built from a two-name-per-sector ranking screen only after an index-condition check on the S&P 500.
All readings on this track · 10 readings
  1. 2001Constructing relative-strength ratios for spreads and rotation
  2. 2001Sector rotation, timing and leverage as a regime case study
  3. 2004Read one stock idea as a late-cycle puzzle
  4. 2004Always-on delayed-weak and live-strong sector sleeves
  5. 2012Building a sector-rotation histogram from rate-of-change spreads
  6. 2012Constructing a bull-bear sector rotation overlay
  7. 2012A relative-performance heatmap for pairs trading and sector rotation
  8. 2014Evaluating an annual contrarian sector rank-rotation
  9. 2014A ranking workflow that treated sector rotation as an abstention procedure
  10. 2015A nine-sector sleeve drill on the business-cycle map
All 10 readings tagged Sector rotation
Also on Sector rotation5 readings