Skip to main content
Track Market order
3 / 26
Library

2000issue C081-5

Direct access, intelligent order routing, and visible book depth

First-generation online brokerage forwarded an entered order to a broker, who then sent it to a Nasdaq market maker or an exchange. Second-generation electronic brokerage connected the trader to market makers, electronic communication networks, and exchange specialists, and intelligent order routing could hunt among counterparties for the best available bid or ask.

  • First-generation online brokerage forwarded an entered order to a broker, who then sent it to a Nasdaq market maker or an exchange.
  • Second-generation electronic brokerage connected the trader electronically to market makers, electronic communication networks, and exchange specialists as destinations for over-the-counter or listed execution.
  • Intelligent order routing hunted among counterparties for the best available bid or ask and selected a destination for speed and execution quality. A trader could pick a counterparty or let routing search for the desired price and volume.
  • Streaming Level II showed the inside market. Depth-of-book displays, where a network allowed it, showed all buy and sell orders in that electronic communication network rather than only the best bid and ask.
Entries in this reading3 entries

From broker handoff to electronic destinations

First-generation online brokerage forwarded an entered order to a broker, who then sent it to a Nasdaq market maker or an exchange. The entered order left the trader's screen, but the destination was still chosen downstream.

Second-generation electronic brokerage connected the trader electronically to market makers, electronic communication networks, and exchange specialists as destinations for over-the-counter or listed execution. Those names were no longer only background labels. They were places an order could be sent.

Order routing as a destination choice

Order routing means choosing which venue or counterparty receives an order so that available price, size, and speed are considered together.

Intelligent order routing hunted among counterparties for the best available bid or ask at that moment and selected a destination for speed and execution quality.

A trader could pick a counterparty and send the order electronically, or let routing search for the counterpart offering the desired price and volume.

When a market order should hunt

A market order seeks immediate execution at the best available bid or offer rather than resting at a specified price. That still leaves a destination question: who is asked to fill it.

Nasdaq execution paths included Small Order Execution System and SelectNet, while the New York Stock Exchange used SuperDot, which in turn linked to the intermarket trading system.

Editorial: a market order handed to one broker is not the same action as a market order allowed to hunt among those paths for the best available bid or offer.

Inspect more than the inside quote

A liquidity filter uses visible book depth, venue access, and available size to decide whether a destination can actually fill the intended trade.

Streaming Level II showed the inside market, and depth-of-book displays, where a network allowed it, showed all buy and sell orders in that electronic communication network rather than only the best bid and ask. The inside quote is the top of the book. It is not the whole book.

The same routing idea without the full toolkit

An easier direct-access platform was launched so less-active traders could use intelligent order routing without the full high-end toolkit. Destination choice was not reserved for the most elaborate screen.

A later product plan folded real-time charting, Level II data, and options trading into a simpler platform while leaving more advanced decision-support tools on the high-end system.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
3 of 26 in the Market order track
20011-2 pp.Next on Market orderRetail routing and market versus limit fillsEditorial reading: the first implementation-cost decision is a three-part click of market order versus limit order, which venue receives the ticket, and whether the receiving dealer honors or fades the displayed quote in a short interval.
All readings on this track · 26 readings
  1. 1995Canceled prints versus executable fills
  2. 1999How order routing changes market and limit fills
  3. 2000Direct access, intelligent order routing, and visible book depth
  4. 2001Retail routing and market versus limit fills
  5. 2001Stop triggers and opening-only short market orders
  6. 2002Market-order routing across linked venues
  7. 2002Market-order routing, internalization, and displayed size
  8. 2004Direct access order routing after the display rules
  9. 2004Listed-stock limit envelopes versus market-order routing
  10. 2005Closing option spreads with limit or market orders
  11. 2005Contingent routing as a pre-trade futures contract
  12. 2007Constructing executable futures orders with market, limit, and fill or kill
  13. 2008Bid-ask spreads, routing paths, and order choice
  14. 2008Retail market buys hit the ask
  15. 2008Limit versus market orders for a commodity option-spread
  16. 2011A pre-trade checklist before market or limit orders
  17. 2013Retail market orders and the displayed queue they never join
  18. 2013Option stop orders, wide spreads and forced market exits
  19. 2014Opening range breakout with weekday ratings, abstention and exits
  20. 2014Constructing forex orders from session liquidity
  21. 2015Order-type and routing scripts for faster execution
  22. 2015Market, limit, and routing choices inside the order life cycle
  23. 2015Handheld futures tickets as a second execution venue
  24. 2017Screen execution starts from the live bid and ask
  25. 2017Electronic stop-loss orders and protected price bands
  26. 2020Market-order slippage on split-adjusted stock prices
All 32 readings tagged Market order
Also on Market order5 readings