2004issue C071
Listed-stock limit envelopes versus market-order routing
On listed names a priced limit can be matched by the book or a post assistant and complete before a market order that still waits for the specialist. A cheaper marketable ticket can still lose if the broker, not the listing post, sets the print.
- A priced limit on a listed name can be matched by the book or a post assistant and complete before a market order that waits for the specialist to set the print.
- A two-sided limit envelope places a small bid one increment above large displayed demand and a small offer one increment below large displayed supply, seeking a better print if that size is cleaned up.
- A cheaper market-order commission can be smaller than the implementation-cost gap, as in a 20-dollar fee saving versus a 200-dollar worse fill on a 2,000-share trade.
- Before sending a marketable ticket, the trader needs to know whether internalized routing lets the broker rather than the listing venue set the print.
Priced limits can complete first
On listed names a priced limit can be matched by the book or a post assistant, while a market order waits for the specialist to set the print, so the limit can complete first.
The archive presents that contrast as a listing-book workflow. The priced ticket is already executable against standing interest. The market ticket still waits for the specialist print.
A two-sided envelope around displayed size
A limit envelope is a pair of working priced orders placed just inside large displayed demand and supply so a cleanup of that size can complete the smaller tickets at a better print. The small bid sits one increment above large displayed demand. The small offer sits one increment below large displayed supply.
Prints one or two increments through a large bid or offer often take that size and force nearby shorts or longs to cover, so the tape tends to migrate toward the largest standing interest. That tendency is the size magnet.
That two-sided placement around size is an envelope tactic, not a one-sided momentum entry from only the bid or only the offer.
A cheaper ticket can still lose on the fill
A cheaper market-order commission can be smaller than the implementation-cost gap on the same ticket. The implementation-cost gap is the difference between a lower ticket fee and a worse fill price across the full share count of the trade. The supplied contrast is a 20-dollar fee saving versus a 200-dollar worse fill on a 2,000-share trade.
Who sets the print
Brokers may prefer customer market orders because those tickets are not bound to a stated price, leave more reporting discretion, and can be internalized or sold to a third-party destination. Internalized routing is a broker completing a customer order in-house or sending it to a third-party destination instead of exposing it as a priced interest on the listing book.
Before sending a marketable ticket, the trader needs to know whether the broker rather than the listing venue will set the print through internalization or sale of the order.
Floor clerks complete immediately executable contras at the better standing price and report residual market-order imbalance so the specialist can decide where to print the excess and supply liquidity. Immediately executable interest is a live bid or offer that a floor clerk can complete against a contra at the better standing price without waiting for a new auction.
When a market order is reserved
In this historical workflow a market order is reserved for the final seconds of the session when a position must be flattened before the close.
All readings on this track · 26 readings
- 1995Canceled prints versus executable fills
- 1999How order routing changes market and limit fills
- 2000Direct access, intelligent order routing, and visible book depth
- 2001Retail routing and market versus limit fills
- 2001Stop triggers and opening-only short market orders
- 2002Market-order routing across linked venues
- 2002Market-order routing, internalization, and displayed size
- 2004Direct access order routing after the display rules
- 2004Listed-stock limit envelopes versus market-order routing
- 2005Closing option spreads with limit or market orders
- 2005Contingent routing as a pre-trade futures contract
- 2007Constructing executable futures orders with market, limit, and fill or kill
- 2008Bid-ask spreads, routing paths, and order choice
- 2008Retail market buys hit the ask
- 2008Limit versus market orders for a commodity option-spread
- 2011A pre-trade checklist before market or limit orders
- 2013Retail market orders and the displayed queue they never join
- 2013Option stop orders, wide spreads and forced market exits
- 2014Opening range breakout with weekday ratings, abstention and exits
- 2014Constructing forex orders from session liquidity
- 2015Order-type and routing scripts for faster execution
- 2015Market, limit, and routing choices inside the order life cycle
- 2015Handheld futures tickets as a second execution venue
- 2017Screen execution starts from the live bid and ask
- 2017Electronic stop-loss orders and protected price bands
- 2020Market-order slippage on split-adjusted stock prices