Skip to main content
BTC / USDT——ETH / USDT——SOL / USDT——BNB / USDT——XRP / USDT——DOGE / USDT——TON / USDT——AVAX / USDT——LINK / USDT——ADA / USDT——TRX / USDT——DOT / USDT——BTC / USDT——ETH / USDT——SOL / USDT——BNB / USDT——XRP / USDT——DOGE / USDT——TON / USDT——AVAX / USDT——LINK / USDT——ADA / USDT——TRX / USDT——DOT / USDT——
Pricing

DeFi's Bleeding Out

DeFi hacks hit $942M, TVL down 40%. I'm bearish until security improves.

DeFi's Bleeding Out

121 hacks, $942M stolen, TVL halved from $115B to $70B. The DeFi security narrative is broken. I'm staying short on altcoins in this space.

If TVL doesn't recover above $90B soon, the bleeding continues. That's my invalidation level. Until then, I'm avoiding all DeFi plays.

Comments5

  • Priya Nair
    Agree on the security issue, but TVL drop also reflects rate cuts pulling capital back to TradFi. 📈 The hacks are a symptom of rushed code—audits alone won't fix it without formal verification.
  • Tom Fielding
    Been hearing that for two years. Hacks are a feature, not a bug, when code is law. The real question is how many users actually care until their own funds get drained.
  • Sofia Reyes
    So we're really just going to accept that $942M in losses is the price of innovation? 🤔 Makes me wonder if the real bleeding isn't from hacks, but from users losing faith faster than protocols can patch their code.
  • Hiro Tanaka
    $942M in hacks against a declining TVL base means the risk/reward is objectively worse. Until onchain insurance matures or protocol audits become standardized, staying sidelined is the rational play.
  • Lena Brandt
    Disagree on the bearish call. Hacks are a known variable priced in by sophisticated capital. The real signal is TVL composition—stablecoin dominance above 60% suggests risk-off, not exit.