Skip to main content
Track Candlestick engulfing
3 / 16
Library

2001issue C121-9

Two-bar candlestick reversal as a timed construction

A long-side two-bar reversal is three OHLC tests on the same bar: a lower low, a close above the prior close, and a close-not-at-high filter. The constructions increment the pattern count one bar later and test a follow-through high on the bar after the completed reversal, not inside the two-bar sequence.

  • A long-side two-bar reversal is three OHLC tests on the same bar: a low below the prior low, a close above the prior close, and a close strictly below that bar's high.
  • Confirmation lag increments the pattern count one bar after those predicates first become true, rather than on the formation bar.
  • Comparing the two pattern highs records intra-pattern structure. The follow-through high is whether the next bar prints a high at or above the reversal bar's high.
  • The same three-part predicate can mark a chart, raise an alert, or filter a scan without an order. If an order is attached, the constructions use a one-bar exit window, a last-bar-of-chart check, and a next-bar close when a limit at the reversal high is not filled.
Entries in this reading2 entries

Three tests on the same bar

A long-side two-bar reversal can be defined by three OHLC tests on the same bar: a low below the prior low, a close above the prior close, and a close strictly below that bar's high. The last of those tests is the close-not-at-high filter.

Together the tests describe an engulfing-style reclaim. A lower low is followed by a close that recaptures the prior close, creating overlapping bodies. The construction uses the current bar and the prior bar together rather than a single-bar silhouette.

Confirmation lag

Pattern-occurrence counters in the constructions increment one bar after the three-part condition is true rather than on the formation bar. That confirmation lag is what later outcome tests treat as completion of the two-bar reversal.

Intra-pattern high and follow-through high

Comparing the high of the second bar of a two-bar reversal with the high of the first bar records intra-pattern structure, not whether the bar after the completed pattern extended higher.

The follow-through test used across the constructions asks whether the high of the bar after the completed reversal is greater than or equal to the high of the reversal bar. That later print is the follow-through high.

One-bar exit window

An unguarded exit attached to a reversal entry will apply on every later bar unless it is restricted to the first bar after entry. That restriction is the one-bar exit window.

Last bar and an unfilled next-bar limit

Detecting the last bar of a chart by comparing calendar dates fails on intraday series and is replaced in the constructions by a last-bar-of-chart check.

When the next-bar limit at the reversal high is not filled and a stop has not been hit, the constructions close the position on that next bar's close instead of remaining open.

A completed-bar entry

Because a bar's close is unknown until the bar ends, an entry specified at that close is a completed-bar rule and cannot be placed as a live end-of-session market order without an intraday proxy near the session close.

Marks, alerts, and scans

The same three-part OHLC predicate can mark bars on a chart, raise an alert, or filter a scan without attaching an order.

What the construction reports

Outcome reporting for the construction combines a pattern count, a total-bar count, and the share of patterns whose following bar makes a high at or above the prior high.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
3 of 16 in the Candlestick engulfing track
20021-5 pp.Next on Candlestick engulfingEngulfing reversal needs trend and a trailing stopAn engulfing-pair is two consecutive opposite-color candle bodies in which the later body fully covers the earlier body; shadows are ignored.
All readings on this track · 16 readings
  1. 1991Candlestick stops from confirmation and engulfing
  2. 1994Stacked candlestick confirmation on Malaysian indexes, 1994
  3. 2001Two-bar candlestick reversal as a timed construction
  4. 2002Engulfing reversal needs trend and a trailing stop
  5. 2003Engulfing geometry needs a swing slope referee
  6. 2004Constructing stops from candle control levels
  7. 2007Abstention completes the engulfing system
  8. 2007Constructing the belthold candlestick signal
  9. 2008Evaluating engulfing reversals with opposite-exit tests
  10. 2010Candle names as a filter, not a catalog
  11. 2012Critiquing engulfing and volume patterns as crowd psychology
  12. 2012Candlestick construction of bullish engulfing and a paper-trading rehearsal
  13. 2015Reading engulfing candles in context
  14. 2018Treat a bullish engulfing as unfinished work
  15. 2019Evaluating bullish engulfing with context filters
  16. 2020Eight-bar pause reclaim entry and a stop-target grid
All 26 readings tagged Candlestick engulfing
Also on Candlestick engulfing5 readings