Skip to main content
Track Candlestick engulfing
14 / 16
Library

2018issue C1216-19

Treat a bullish engulfing as unfinished work

A bullish engulfing marked at the Day 0 close is only a trigger after a decline. The historical workflow still required falling short-horizon averages, a higher-horizon average stack, a mapped swing high, and a confirmation clock.

  • A bullish engulfing marked at the Day 0 close is a trigger after a decline, not a complete trade plan.
  • Both the five-day and ten-day simple moving averages had to be falling on Day 0 and the next two sessions, while the 100-day average stayed above the 400-day average on the name and on the S&P 500.
  • The mapped objective was a nearby local peak within 30 sessions, and three entries were specified, including a delayed open two sessions later after a close above Day 0's high.
  • Protective exits, an acceptance gate of at least 1.0, a 200-day average overlay, and a companion trendline sat beside the candle rather than replacing it.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Mark the bar at the Day 0 close

The historical workflow marked the bullish engulfing condition on Day 0 at the close. That two-session candlestick condition was used as the Day 0 trigger after a decline, not as a complete trade plan.

Later timing, stops, and targets were measured from that same Day 0 session.

Write the moving-average state

Both the five-day and ten-day simple moving averages had to be falling on Day 0 and on the next two sessions. That short-horizon filter placed the engulfing bar inside a pullback.

A higher-horizon filter required the 100-day simple moving average to remain above the 400-day simple moving average on the individual name and on the S&P 500.

Day 0 volume had to exceed the prior 14-day average and 100,000 shares. Last price had to sit between 20 and 90 dollars, and the universe was the Russell 3000.

Map a nearby swing high

The mapped objective was the high of a prior local peak that exceeded the surrounding three sessions. That peak had to fall no more than 30 sessions before the engulfing bar.

One acceptance gate required the distance from a prospective entry to the mapped peak, divided by the two-dollar risk, to be at least 1.0. An early-exit rule placed the objective at Day 0's high plus the full Day 0 range from high to low.

Cash committed to each name was capped at 10,000 dollars.

Specify a confirmation clock

Three entries were specified: buy the next open; buy the open two sessions later only after a close above Day 0's high; and that same delayed entry only if the intervening high did not exceed Day 0's high.

The first protective exit sat two dollars under Day 0's high. A later variant also flattened if a session closed ten cents under Day 0's low while leaving that two-dollar stop in place.

Win rate of three bullish-engulfing entry rules

Buying the next open after a Day 0 engulfing (scenario 1) won 45.74% of trades. Waiting for the next close to clear the Day 0 high (scenario 2) lifted that share to 60.28%, while the stricter confirmation that also rejects a Day+1 high above Day 0 (scenario 3) landed at 53.57%. Those percentages are taken from the author's printed backtest table covering Russell 3000 stocks from 10 January 2000 through 31 December 2017.
Buying the next open after a Day 0 engulfing (scenario 1) won 45.74% of trades. Waiting for the next close to clear the Day 0 high (scenario 2) lifted that share to 60.28%, while the stricter confirmation that also rejects a Day+1 high above Day 0 (scenario 3) landed at 53.57%. Those percentages are taken from the author's printed backtest table covering Russell 3000 stocks from 10 January 2000 through 31 December 2017.Russell 3000 stocks · Daily · 2000-01-10T00:00:00.000Z to 2017-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Each position was sized at no more than $10,000 with a $2 stop under the Day 0 high. The pattern also had to print against a falling 5-day and 10-day average, a 100-day average above the 400-day average on both the stock and the S&P 500, Day 0 volume above the 14-day average and above 100,000 shares, and a price between $20 and $90. The author notes a live book would be thinner once extra support and resistance filters are applied.

Keep companions beside the bar

A 200-day simple-moving-average overlay required a Day 0 or Day 1 low beneath that average and a close back above it, with a few cents of slack.

The same write-up treated trendlines and later price action as companion conditions rather than as a replacement for the engulfing bar.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
14 of 16 in the Candlestick engulfing track
201940-43 pp.Next on Candlestick engulfingEvaluating bullish engulfing with context filtersA bullish engulfing is a bearish candle followed by a bullish candle whose body covers the first, and the same structure is treated as more informative after a decline.
All readings on this track · 16 readings
  1. 1991Candlestick stops from confirmation and engulfing
  2. 1994Stacked candlestick confirmation on Malaysian indexes, 1994
  3. 2001Two-bar candlestick reversal as a timed construction
  4. 2002Engulfing reversal needs trend and a trailing stop
  5. 2003Engulfing geometry needs a swing slope referee
  6. 2004Constructing stops from candle control levels
  7. 2007Abstention completes the engulfing system
  8. 2007Constructing the belthold candlestick signal
  9. 2008Evaluating engulfing reversals with opposite-exit tests
  10. 2010Candle names as a filter, not a catalog
  11. 2012Critiquing engulfing and volume patterns as crowd psychology
  12. 2012Candlestick construction of bullish engulfing and a paper-trading rehearsal
  13. 2015Reading engulfing candles in context
  14. 2018Treat a bullish engulfing as unfinished work
  15. 2019Evaluating bullish engulfing with context filters
  16. 2020Eight-bar pause reclaim entry and a stop-target grid
All 26 readings tagged Candlestick engulfing
Also on Candlestick engulfing5 readings