Skip to main content
Track Maximum adverse excursion
3 / 15
Library

1991issue C061-4

Opening gap fades bounded by excursion and time stops

Trading with an opening gap did not separate favorable from adverse excursion, even after larger gap filters and longer holding windows. Later tests faded the gap only after a fifty-point reverse stop and a third-day time stop had already defined how far and how long a loss could run.

  • Trading in the direction of an opening gap produced almost no separation between favorable and adverse excursion at one, two, or twelve days after entry.
  • Same-direction entries showed adverse movement at least as often as favorable movement, so later tests faded the opening gap instead.
  • Most winning fades stayed inside fifty points of adverse movement, which is why a fifty-point reverse stop and a third-day time stop were proposed.
  • For a point-target trade, only the adverse move before exit should be counted. Measuring unused holding days inflates losses that never occur.
Entries in this reading3 entries

Same-direction entries did not separate excursion

An opening gap is a session open above the prior day's high or below the prior day's low. Gap trading is a single testable procedure that defines entry, target, reversal and abstention from that opening print.

Trading in the direction of an opening gap produced almost no separation between favorable and adverse excursion, including when movement was inspected one, two, or twelve days after entry. Raising the minimum gap filter from one point through larger thresholds up to fifty points left the favorable-excursion profile essentially unchanged from the one-point-gap case.

Same-direction gap entries showed adverse movement that was at least as common as favorable movement. Later tests reversed the rule and faded the opening gap instead. A gap fade is an entry taken opposite the opening gap rather than in the gap's direction.

Count adverse excursion only until the planned exit

Maximum favorable excursion is the largest move in the intended direction after entry. It is used to check whether a small target is reachable at all. Maximum adverse excursion is the largest move against a position before the planned exit. It is used to bound loss or exposure instead of scoring unused days after the trade is already closed.

For a point-target trade, only the adverse move before exit should be counted. Measuring maximum adverse excursion across the entire unused holding window inflates losses that never occur if the position is already closed.

Winning fades stayed inside a tighter adverse range

In fades of any opening gap that targeted twenty points, winning trades rarely exceeded one hundred points of adverse movement, while losing trades continued beyond one hundred twenty-five points. Most winning fades stayed inside fifty points of adverse movement, and many stayed inside twenty-five points. A fifty-point reverse stop in the original gap direction was proposed as the loss bound.

When entries faded gaps of fifty points or more, the smallest favorable excursion recorded was eight points. That eight-point figure was then used as the profit-taking threshold in the follow-up tally. An eight-point target fade of any opening gap still produced adverse excursions large enough that a cutoff beyond one hundred fifty points against the position was discussed as a practical bound.

A time stop at the end of the third day

Winning fades typically completed on the entry day or within two to three sessions. A time stop at the end of the third day was proposed for trades that had not already hit the fifty-point price stop. A time stop is a calendar cutoff that ends a still-open trade after a fixed number of sessions when the price stop has not been hit.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
3 of 15 in the Maximum adverse excursion track
19911-2 pp.Next on Maximum adverse excursionStop bounds versus added system parametersAdding a stop after simulated profits look too small, without removing another control or increasing sample size, introduces a new parameter and reduces statistical freedom.
All readings on this track · 15 readings
  1. 1987Evaluating a black-box pyramiding routine with adverse excursion
  2. 1991Set the first stop from a capital-scaled MAE histogram
  3. 1991Opening gap fades bounded by excursion and time stops
  4. 1991Stop bounds versus added system parameters
  5. 1991Bound losses with MAE, stops, and drawdown limits
  6. 1992Multi-year evaluation of MAE-bounded mechanical rules
  7. 1992Moving-average add-ons could not be separated by maximum adverse excursion
  8. 1992Evaluating maximum-adverse-excursion stop reversals with short time stops
  9. 1992Failed range trades as breakout-system tests
  10. 1998Fitted moving averages for trend add-on entries
  11. 1998Monthly changer rules specified as one mechanical procedure
  12. 2002An excursion cutoff test for stops and profit exits
  13. 2006Constructing peak-excursion filters for stops and size
  14. 2006Cost-aware excursion filters for stops and holding period
  15. 2017Staged stops, drawdown limits, and mechanical risk survival
All 16 readings tagged Maximum adverse excursion
Also on Maximum adverse excursion5 readings