2012issue C1312-37
Three Fibonacci rules to label trend versus countertrend
A completed swing is scored with a 61.8 percent retracement test, same-direction extensions at 1.618, 2.618, and 4.236, and Fibonacci bar counts. The three rules stack with Elliott wave analysis to constrain whether a labeled impulse or correction is still incomplete.
- Adjacent Fibonacci numbers sum to the next number, and dividing a term by the prior term approximates 1.618, from which chart ratios such as 0.382, 0.5, 0.618, 1, 1.5, and 2.618 are derived.
- A move that retraces no more than 61.8 percent of the prior swing is treated as consistent with a continuing trend; a deeper move is treated as consistent with a countertrend or trend-change hypothesis.
- The next impulse is measured against the prior same-direction impulse at 1.618, 2.618, and 4.236 extensions, and a swing that has already consumed a Fibonacci number of bars is treated as nearer a completion test.
- The three rules are stacked with Elliott wave analysis so Fibonacci retracement, extension, and time counts constrain whether a labeled impulse or correction is still incomplete.
Three construction rules on a completed swing
A completed swing is scored with three construction rules before a trend or countertrend reading is carried forward. Fibonacci retracement, extension, and time counts are then stacked with Elliott wave analysis and wave counting so a labeled impulse or correction can still be treated as incomplete.
How the chart ratios are derived
Adjacent Fibonacci numbers sum to the next number, and dividing a term by the prior term approximates 1.618. From that relationship, ratios such as 0.382, 0.5, 0.618, 1, 1.5, and 2.618 are derived for chart work.
Rule one: retracement depth
The first construction rule uses Fibonacci retracement. A move that retraces no more than 61.8 percent of the prior swing is treated as consistent with a continuing trend. A move that exceeds that level is treated as consistent with a countertrend or trend-change hypothesis.
In the S&P 500 example, a spring 2008 recovery of about 200 points after a drop of more than 300 points stalled within a handful of points of a 61.8 percent retracement of the prior downswing and then reversed.
Rule two: same-direction extensions
The second construction rule measures the length of the next impulse against the prior impulse of the same direction. The 1.618, 2.618, and 4.236 extensions are used as candidate completion zones.
In that same S&P 500 construction, the later decline approached a 1.618 extension of the first downswing near 1270 and then a 2.618 extension near 750, with the 2009 low forming just above the second zone.
Rule three: swing duration
The third construction rule uses Fibonacci numbers as candidate durations for a swing. A move that has already consumed a sequence number of bars is treated as nearer a completion test than one that has not.
On the illustrated daily S&P 500 downswing, the first decline lasted 21 days, the bounce 13 days, and the next decline 89 days, matching Fibonacci counts used to time the structure.
Stacking the rules with wave labels
The three rules are meant to be stacked with Elliott wave analysis. Wave counting assigns the impulse or correction labels. Fibonacci retracement, extension, and time counts then constrain whether a labeled impulse or correction is still incomplete.
All readings on this track · 16 readings
- 1991Wave counting as a sampling frame for head and shoulders
- 1995Constructing a percent-reversal wave filter
- 1995Filtered waves, overdue duration, candles, and trend
- 1995Filtered swing ledger for MW pattern construction
- 2003Three ratio tests from a completed supercycle
- 2004Wave labels as a checklist for expansion versus contraction
- 2010Constructing wave-ratio signals from a quadratic trend filter
- 2011A temporary placeholder while source evidence is loaded
- 2011Construct a harmonic impulse from measured three-wave limbs
- 2012Three Fibonacci rules to label trend versus countertrend
- 2013Sentiment wave counts before news headlines
- 2013Constructing a 1-2-3 wave count from high-low zigzag swings
- 2013Step candle confirmations with wave count and chandelier exit
- 2016Nested wave rhythms and double-bottom support
- 2016Nested correction-size bands and a derived support price
- 2020Counting a Nasdaq correction before stacking Fibonacci targets