Skip to main content
Track Measured move
7 / 12
Library

2006issue C041-2

The swing rule as a measured move beyond a broken barrier

Under the swing rule, a later successful break of support or resistance is hypothesized to travel at least as far beyond the barrier as prices originally retreated from it. A 2005 CEPH daily sequence shows how that retreat was sized and how the minimum projection was later checked.

  • Common reversal and continuation constructions estimate a minimum post-break path by transferring the height of the pattern beyond the breakout or breakdown.
  • Under the swing rule, a later successful break of support or resistance is hypothesized to travel at least as far beyond the barrier as prices originally retreated from it.
  • In the 2005 CEPH daily case, a 5.75-point swing from an August low of 38.24 to a July high of 43.99 was added to that high for a 49.74 minimum upside, later exceeded by a late-November close of 50.03.
  • Historical usage notes treated the swing projection as a checkpoint at which at least half of a position would be reduced and remaining risk tightened, rather than as a guaranteed terminal price.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A chart answer to discontinuous prices

Swing symmetry is presented as one chart-study answer to the claim that price paths are too discontinuous to anticipate. Markets are treated as patterned expressions of non-random human behavior, so successive advances and retreats can be compared.

A swing chart organizes price around those successive advances and retreats. Support and resistance are the prior stall zones that first halt a trend and later become the barrier a measured swing must break.

How the swing rule sizes the next path

Common reversal and continuation constructions estimate a minimum post-break path by transferring the height of the pattern beyond the breakout or breakdown. A measured move copies the height of a completed swing or pattern and applies that height beyond the breakout or breakdown level.

The swing rule is a measured-move construction that projects a minimum extension after a later break of a previously tested barrier, using the depth of the prior retreat from that barrier. Under that construction, a later successful break of support or resistance is hypothesized to travel at least as far beyond the barrier as prices originally retreated from it.

The result is a minimum projection: the smallest extension implied by the swing construction. The chart is checked first against this level, not against a promised terminal price.

The 2005 CEPH daily sequence

In the 2005 CEPH daily case, late-July highs near 44 acted as resistance after a bounce from below 38. The mid-August stall just above 38 became the retreat low that armed an upside measurement.

That CEPH swing was sized at 5.75 points, from an August low of 38.24 to a July high of 43.99, then added to the July high for a 49.74 minimum upside.

After CEPH cleared the July resistance, it printed an intradaily high of 48.75 on 16 September, then spent a multiweek stretch near the former July highs with only one close below that support. The same CEPH sequence later exceeded the 49.74 swing projection with a late-November close of 50.03.

The projection as a checkpoint

Historical usage notes treated the swing projection as a checkpoint at which at least half of a position would be reduced and remaining risk tightened, rather than as a guaranteed terminal price.

CEPH daily closes, summer–autumn 2005

Daily Cephalon path from the mid-38s through the July high near 44 and on past the 49.74 swing-rule floor. Prices were read off Figure 1; the article’s 38.24–43.99 retreat and 49.74 target fix the scale.
Daily Cephalon path from the mid-38s through the July high near 44 and on past the 49.74 swing-rule floor. Prices were read off Figure 1; the article’s 38.24–43.99 retreat and 49.74 target fix the scale.CEPH · daily · 2005-05-01T00:00:00.000Z to 2005-12-31T00:00:00.000Z

Closes digitized from the Prophet.net daily line; raster limits precision to about 0.25–0.5 point. Text gives the exact swing-rule arithmetic: 43.99 − 38.24 = 5.75, so 43.99 + 5.75 = 49.74.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
7 of 12 in the Measured move track
201128-32 pp.Next on Measured moveProve the X7 turn before measuring the reversalWave counting comes first: label seven swings on a bar chart that already has swing highs and swing lows marked, and do not treat the X7 as complete until a later down-leg breaks the baseline.
All readings on this track · 12 readings
  1. 1990Constructing volume-budget targets after a breakout
  2. 1991Constructing price objectives from measured moves and swings
  3. 1997Measuring chart pattern height for breakout targets
  4. 1998Double-top confirmation before the measured move
  5. 1998Writing entry, target, and trail as one procedure
  6. 2005Constructing flag and pennant measured moves
  7. 2006The swing rule as a measured move beyond a broken barrier
  8. 2011Prove the X7 turn before measuring the reversal
  9. 2014Constructing an intraday flag breakout as one procedure
  10. 2017Price mirrors as a fold-test for reversal targets
  11. 2017First swing box as a measured-move exit ruler
  12. 2020The recovered swing high as a halfway-reaction checkpoint
All 14 readings tagged Measured move
Also on Measured move5 readings