Skip to main content
Track Asset allocation
6 / 26
Library

1994issue C111-6

Ratio MACD crossover as a portfolio weight filter

A weekly relative-strength ratio, read with MACD and a nine-week trigger line, can decide when a name, sector, or region earns weight versus cash rather than when price alone looks tradable.

  • A relative-strength ratio of weekly closes shows outperformance or underperformance versus a broad index, even when prices themselves are falling.
  • MACD of that ratio, crossed with a nine-week exponential trigger line, favors holding the security above the trigger and cash or a stronger alternative below it.
  • A price moving-average crossover can confirm the ratio signal when a falling market inflates relative strength, and single stocks can require the ratio MACD to sit above zero as well as above the trigger.
  • Allocation breadth, the share of monitored names on buy versus sell signals, can set equity, cash, regional, and sector weights.
Entries in this reading3 entries

A relative-strength ratio of weekly closes

A relative-strength ratio is formed by dividing a fund or stock weekly close by a broad-index weekly close. A falling ratio marks underperformance. A rising ratio marks outperformance. The ratio is used to show relative performance rather than absolute price direction.

Editorial note: TradersWeek treats this archive workflow as a portfolio-construction filter. The repeatable relative-performance condition decides when a name, sector, or region earns weight versus cash, not when price alone looks tradable.

MACD and the trigger line on the ratio

Two moving averages of the ratio strip noise. Their difference is the MACD line, treated as a leading read on the ratio trend. A nine-period exponential average of that line is the trigger line for important relative-performance turns. Here MACD is applied to the relative-strength ratio, not to the price chart.

MACD applied to that ratio produces discrete signals when the MACD line crosses its nine-week exponential trigger. A cross above the trigger favors holding the security. A cross below it favors cash or a stronger alternative.

Ultra-to-S&P 500 ratio MACD versus the nine-week trigger

Weekly MACD of the Twentieth Century Ultra to S&P 500 close ratio stays above its nine-week trigger when the fund keeps an equity weight and drops below it when the rule moves that sleeve to cash. Coordinates were read from the Ultra/S&P 500 MACD pane dated 17 August 1994; no table of values appears in the source.
Weekly MACD of the Twentieth Century Ultra to S&P 500 close ratio stays above its nine-week trigger when the fund keeps an equity weight and drops below it when the rule moves that sleeve to cash. Coordinates were read from the Ultra/S&P 500 MACD pane dated 17 August 1994; no table of values appears in the source.20th Century Ultra / S&P 500 · weekly · 1992-02-06T00:00:00.000Z to 1994-08-17T00:00:00.000Z

Classic MACD applied to the weekly fund/index close ratio; the trigger is the nine-week EMA of that MACD. Dates and levels are approximate readings from the printed weekly plot, not exact computed prints.

Price confirmation and tighter stock rules

If the broad market falls faster than the holding, the ratio can strengthen even as prices decline. A moving-average crossover on price can then be required as a second confirmation, so a rising relative-strength reading is not taken on its own.

For single stocks, which are treated as more volatile than funds, a long setup can require the weekly stock-to-index MACD to sit both above zero and above its trigger. Requiring the stock-ratio MACD to be in positive territory can delay entries while reducing false signals relative to trigger crosses alone.

Allocation breadth for equity, region, and sector weights

Across a watchlist, allocation breadth is the share of names on sell versus buy signals, and that share can set the equity-versus-cash weight. One illustrated case uses 35 sells among 50 names to justify cutting the equity sleeve to 30 percent.

The same breadth comparison between domestic and foreign names can shift capital toward the sleeve with more buy signals. An illustrated mix uses 70 percent of domestic names on sells and 65 percent of foreign names on buys.

The same ratio-MACD crossover applied to sector indices can flag which sectors are outperforming the broad index. It can be used to select constituents from the stronger sector.

Educational research material, not investment advice. Historical source context does not establish present-day performance.
6 of 26 in the Asset allocation track
19951-7 pp.Next on Asset allocationSizing a trend futures sleeve in a 1995 policy shiftA February 1995 policy signal was read as a turn back toward money creation while a more subjective consumer-price gauge reduced trust in official inflation, leaving the asset mix as the open problem.
All readings on this track · 26 readings
  1. 1990Stress-testing a futures sleeve across equity regimes
  2. 1990Staged sleeves from one equity forecast
  3. 1990Score a trade after allocation, diversification, and a drawdown limit
  4. 1993A three-sleeve regime map for equities, rates, and futures
  5. 1994Late-cycle breadth as an allocation exam
  6. 1994Ratio MACD crossover as a portfolio weight filter
  7. 1995Sizing a trend futures sleeve in a 1995 policy shift
  8. 1996A 1990s case on liquidity cycles, rank rotation, and cross-market sleeves
  9. 1997Regime-aware allocation versus binary timing
  10. 1998Hedge-fund sleeves under a hard drawdown limit
  11. 2010True diversification as portfolio construction
  12. 2012Regime-gated trend baskets and layered sizing
  13. 2013Score fund cost drag before the equity-versus-defensive mix
  14. 2013Cost-first fund mix in portfolio construction
  15. 2015Cost-first fund construction and the stock-bond mix
  16. 2016Audit the fund cost-stack, then set the sleeve-mix
  17. 2016Read fund listings through costs, then allocation, then diversification
  18. 2017A four-channel own-account book with signal-replacement
  19. 2017Listed REITs as a standalone portfolio sleeve
  20. 2017Cost-first stock and bond fund construction
  21. 2017Cost-first fund mix in a diversified portfolio
  22. 2018Mutual-fund costs come before returns in portfolio mixes
  23. 2018Cost gates before a stock-bond fund mix
  24. 2019Cost-stack and bond-equity mix around a trade
  25. 2019Evaluate diversification by correlation, not by the mix label
  26. 2020Cost-first fund sleeves and a stock-bond mix
All 55 readings tagged Asset allocation
Also on Asset allocation5 readings