2014issue C0115
Long-strangle premium hurdle and event volatility
A long-strangle stays open to either direction, but the two option-premiums form one budget that must be recovered first. Nearer strikes raise that cost, price-consolidation can drain both wings, and event-implied-volatility often widens the distance before a scheduled release.
- A long-strangle buys an out-of-the-money call-option and put-option together, so the stance is not tied to one direction but still needs a large move either way.
- Combined option-premium is the buyer's maximum risk and the hurdle that must be recovered before the position can show a profit.
- Closer strike-proximity makes the strangle more expensive, and a gain on one wing does not automatically produce a net profit because the opposite wing must be overcome first.
- Price-consolidation can make both wings lose value, and event-implied-volatility often raises the cost of buying a strangle in the days before a scheduled release.
Two wings, one premium budget
A long-strangle is the simultaneous purchase of an out-of-the-money call-option and an out-of-the-money put-option. The result is a directionally neutral stance that still requires a large move one way or the other.
The combined option-premium paid for both wings is the buyer's maximum risk and the hurdle that must be recovered before the position can show a profit.
Strike-proximity changes that budget. Strikes placed closer to the current futures price make the strangle more expensive because those rights are more valuable.
A gain on the favorable wing does not automatically produce a net profit, because the loss on the opposite wing must be overcome first.
A third outcome and a pre-event cost
In a consolidating market both the call-option and the put-option can lose value. Price-consolidation is a third path besides a rise or a fall, and it can defeat the long-strangle structure.
In a late-October 2013 e-mini S&P 500 illustration, a 1770 call-option and a 1720 put-option with 22 days to expiration each cost about $9.00 ($450), for a combined $18.00 ($900) of option-premium and maximum risk.
If that illustrated strangle were held to expiration, the futures would have needed to finish above 1788 or below 1702 to recoup both premiums.
Option prices often expand before a scheduled, widely anticipated release as the market prices in higher expected volatility. That event-implied-volatility raises the cost of buying a strangle in the days leading into the event.
Editorial reading of the archive workflow
Editorial interpretation: the historical steps are to add the two premiums, locate the expiration break-evens, and then check whether event-implied-volatility has already stretched that distance before a known release. This reading is a TradersWeek framing and is not a claim made by the archive.
All readings on this track · 15 readings
- 1987Write the exclusion zone, then choose the structure
- 2001Straddles, strangles, and calendars in an index portfolio context
- 2006Event-week straddle and strangle construction with residual delta
- 2007Straddle versus strangle construction and a debit-spread cash audit
- 2010Critiquing event-priced straddles and expiration pin-risk
- 2010Placing an options strangle in the 2010 market regime
- 2010Short strangle construction from range, volatility and premium
- 2011Iron butterfly as packaged straddle and strangle
- 2012Calm as one testable trading procedure
- 2014Long-strangle premium hurdle and event volatility
- 2014Constructing short strangles as range income in futures options
- 2014Paired stop futures strangles fail on false breakouts
- 2015Construct a name-specific fear overlay before a short strangle
- 2016Financed protective puts, upside caps, and hedge timing
- 2017Hours, capital gates, and strangle margin on emini S&P options