1986issue C091-6
Constructing a pre-entry risk filter on price-ratio grids
A planned position can be accepted or rejected before capital is committed by building a payoff table on weekly price ratios, attaching a holding-period probability column from recent volatility, and reading three risk indicators from the combined grid.
- A risk-of-ruin-filter is a go-or-no-go check that bounds planned exposure only after a payoff table and a probability column have been combined.
- The shared axis is a price-ratio-grid of weekly price ratios, which keeps equal dollar commitments comparable across different price levels.
- Probability-of-profit, expected-profit, and sigma-in-the-profit are read from an integration-sheet that merges the profit-sheet with the distribution-sheet.
- The distribution-sheet should be run first so several security combinations from the same company can share one volatility projection.
A filter that waits for both columns
A pre-commitment risk assessment can be built from three indicators: the chance the position is profitable relative to initial capital, the probability-weighted expected percent result, and the dispersion of that result.
Those indicators are produced by combining a table of percent profit versus future price with a projected probability distribution of those prices.
Editorial interpretation: treat the finished indicators as a risk-of-ruin-filter. That is a constructed go-or-no-go check that bounds planned exposure after payoff and probability have been combined, before capital is committed.
Why the random variable is a weekly price ratio
The random variable is the weekly price ratio rather than the raw point change, because a 10-point move is a 100 percent wealth change in a 10-dollar stock and only a 10 percent change in a 100-dollar stock when equal dollar amounts are committed.
A 10 percent rise is expressed as a 1.10 ratio for either security, and the implied future price is the product of that ratio and the purchase price.
The shared axis is a price-ratio-grid: evenly spaced weekly price ratios used for both the payoff table and the probability column.
Three worksheets, one shared grid
The construction is split into a profit-sheet that maps terms and holding period to a percent-profit column, a distribution-sheet that maps price-history variance to a future-price distribution, and an integration-sheet that merges the two columns.
Building the profit-sheet
The profit-sheet turns quantity, price, terms, cash cost, and holding period into percent profit at each ratio step.
Short exposure is entered as a negative quantity. When no expiration applies, a 52-week holding period is used. Cash cost includes the original outlay plus margin interest, and profitability is measured against that original value on a 0.05 ratio grid.
Convertible payoffs can be mapped by iteratively choosing a gamma until the model price is close enough to the observed convertible price, then varying future stock price in that model to obtain the convertible value at each ratio.
Building the distribution-sheet
The distribution-sheet turns a year of weekly closes into variance, projects that variance over the holding period, and emits a probability column.
It uses 52 weekly closes to form successive price ratios, their natural logs and squares, then a variance projected across the holding period.
A biased-ratio shift then places the peak of the projected distribution at a ratio of 1.0 so short-horizon drift is removed before the probability column is formed.
Reading the integration-sheet
The integration-sheet combines the percent-profit column with the matching probability mass to form the three risk indicators on a 0.05 ratio step.
Probability-of-profit is the share of the projected ratio distribution in which the position finishes above the original cash outlay. Expected-profit is the probability-weighted average percent outcome of the position across the ratio grid. Sigma-in-the-profit is the dispersion of those percent outcomes around the expected value, used as a variability check.
Shared projections and grid spacing
The distribution-sheet should be run first so several security combinations from the same company can share one volatility projection.
Widening the step to 0.10 reduces processing time but coarsens the grid and reduces accuracy.
All readings on this track · 24 readings
- 1985Forced-close odds from monthly edge and leverage
- 1986Constructing a pre-entry risk filter on price-ratio grids
- 1991Ratchet the halt floor and stage exposure against cash
- 1992Sizing capital from degraded records and volatility
- 1992Filter size by expected value and ruin
- 1995Risk of ruin as a pre-entry position filter
- 1995Filter leverage by sequence-loss odds
- 1996Grading track records by drawdown, expected value, and ruin
- 1998When quieter returns lose their survival edge
- 1999Loss response versus a precommitted trading process
- 1999Reauthorize ruin and drawdown filters after a winning stretch
- 2000Sold premium, survivorship, and ruin bounds
- 2001Monte Carlo drawdown risk and volatility position sizing
- 2001Alertness is a size filter, not a mood
- 2002A constant percent risk bound beats a higher win rate
- 2010Risk of ruin with fractional and reserve betting
- 2014Payout identity, expectancy, and path-dependent ruin
- 2015Spreading names is not a substitute for a ruin bound
- 2015Prestige labels versus one testable trade procedure
- 2015Closed-trade quality screens before sizing risk
- 2019Size mini futures from drawdown and leftover margin
- 2019Starting account size as a survival filter
- 2019Pre-entry ruin and volatility caps for short options
- 2020Forced margin, stop-loss, and ruin risk in 2020